A tip for all you guys with slow PCs
A tip for all you guys with slow PCs
Author
Discussion

bad_roo

Original Poster:

5,196 posts

267 months

Wednesday 19th October 2005
quotequote all
Please don't bury this one in the Computers section, because it's aimed at those who aren't techno geeks but are instead soldiering on with a slow PC. If you're running Firefox and have access to a broadband connection (not wireless), here's a tip that will cut page loading and some download times virtually in half. Basically after getting to the hidden config settings you set the browser to request more data that it usually does.


1.Type “about:config” into the address bar and hit return. Scroll down and look for the following entries:

network.http.pipelining
network.http.proxy.pipelining
network.http.pipelining.maxrequests

Normally the browser will make one request to a web page at a time. When you enable pipelining it will make several at once, which really speeds up page loading.

2. Alter the entries as follows:

Set “network.http.pipelining” to “true”
Set “network.http.proxy.pipelining” to “true”
Set “network.http.pipelining.maxrequests” to some number like 30. This means it will make 30 requests at once.

3. Right-click anywhere and select New-> Integer.

Name it “nglayout.initialpaint.delay” and set its value to “0”.

This value is the amount of time the browser waits before it acts on information it receives.

4. Right-click anywhere and select New-> Boolean.

Name it "browser.turbo.enabled" and set its value to "True"

Ba-da bing. You should be good to go. Check it out.

lazyitus

19,931 posts

296 months

Wednesday 19th October 2005
quotequote all
I did this a few months back.

It works, Oh yes, it works.

thunderstruck

8,879 posts

312 months

Wednesday 19th October 2005
quotequote all
Blimey that really does seem to work.

Incidentally, why does the broadband connection have to be wired rather than wireless?

>> Edited by thunderstruck on Wednesday 19th October 10:01

scared but happy

24,147 posts

259 months

Wednesday 19th October 2005
quotequote all
Impressed!! Know any more good ones.
thump up thread

pm99

244 posts

289 months

Wednesday 19th October 2005
quotequote all
what about speeding up wireless?

is wireless restricted by the transfer rate 54 mps etc?
ie will it be a bottleneck for the ADSL?
Is the ADSL faster than the wireless?

Plotloss

67,280 posts

300 months

Wednesday 19th October 2005
quotequote all
11g Wireless is 10 times quicker than 512mb broadband so I doubt thats the issue.

This Firefox tuning malarky has a cost, at the webserver end, so expect to see a few pissed off webmasters as their servers get assaulted with more requests than usual...

beano500

20,854 posts

305 months

Wednesday 19th October 2005
quotequote all
Now usually there's no such thing as a free lunch!

Is there any downside to this?

Why isn't it the default setting if it's so good??

(Not trying to be a cynical b^&&3r, btw!!!)

Plotloss

67,280 posts

300 months

Wednesday 19th October 2005
quotequote all
Theres no effect to you, its all at the other end.

pm99

244 posts

289 months

Wednesday 19th October 2005
quotequote all
Thanks Plotless..

In that case...any idea how to improve performamance when watchign a live stream?

The pictur on windows media player keeps stopping.
I have 512 ADSL....wirelss at home. And it is PPLIVE football.

If you knwo of any settigns i can make it would be much appreciated?

Plotloss

67,280 posts

300 months

Wednesday 19th October 2005
quotequote all
Again, it could be at the other end if lots of people are viewing the stream.

Is there anyway you can view the stream over a thicker internet connection round a mates or whathaveyou with your machine?

This would isolate whether its at your end or the stream server end.

telecat

8,528 posts

271 months

Sunday 23rd October 2005
quotequote all
Tried this on my Broadband connection and found that some Pictures didn't display. Have switched most of the settings back or rest and things are back to normal.

neil_cardiff

17,113 posts

294 months

Sunday 23rd October 2005
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
This Firefox tuning malarky has a cost, at the webserver end, so expect to see a few pissed off webmasters as their servers get assaulted with more requests than usual...


I've heard this before too - I believe in simple terms instead of requesting each item one by one (i.e. pics etc) it asks for everything all at once and has multiple instances downloading (think in this way - instead of filling a pool up with one hose - you use five hoses instead - thus allow five times the fill rate).

This has an effect of putting excess load on webservers and bandwidth and so pissing off the webmasters...

But then again

I may stand corrected on the above if I got in wrong

tinman0

18,231 posts

270 months

Sunday 23rd October 2005
quotequote all
I'm not sure what the above is meant to do.

IIRC the original http1.0 spec was pretty plain, and to get multiple images you would create multiple simultaneous requests. this results in say 5 images all downloading slowly but at once

http1.1 which has been around for a very long time was able to queue requests to a single web daemon running on the webserver itself.

this enabled you to downlad all 5 images one after another without adding any extra processes to the web server itself. the end result was that the page built itself up one graphic at a time giving the impression of a faster connection, but because you are downloading the same 5 images the download rate should be the same.

eg 5*1 vs 1*5.

however, with broadband, by setting it to make multiple requests (like in the http1.0 days) you open 5 connections at once to download all 5 images. although many webservers now can deliver a huge amount of data very quickly, the daemons that deliver the data sometimes arent very fast. so, if you have a large pipeline and commandeer 5 daemons to download your pages you could get a faster download time than using the a single daemon to download 5 objects.

and then heres where it gets very odd. built within http1.1 (if i remember correctly) it will only queue requests (eg 1 graphic at a time) if the server is reaching its max number of daemons. at that point the server switches into a different mode so that it can deal with more clients.

so the person who said they got a broken graphic - you got that because the webserver you were dealing with was at a max limit and refused the connection because it saw you trying to do something clever.


>> Edited by tinman0 on Sunday 23 October 17:39

Monkey Boy 1

2,066 posts

261 months

Sunday 23rd October 2005
quotequote all
Does this only wotk with firefox, or can a similar thing be done with I.E. ?

I have done it with firefox & it does seem a lot faster