Which 987 Boxster
Discussion
Due to lack of use (1000 miles per year), and a good offer from an OPC, I’ve just sold my 2022 Cayman GTS 4.0. Very good car but for such rare use it always felt a bit too competent. With a young family the chance of using it was getting harder and harder.
Ive now decided to buy a very good condition 987 Boxster for around £15k. Would like a manual and happy with a 2.7 or 2.9. A lower performance manual convertible appeals.
I would probably keep it for a while and will keep it in good condition, hopefully retaining its value. Won’t feel as guilty not using a £15k car much vs the £70k nearly new Cayman!
I understand only the 3.4S is the one that can have engine issues? Any advice on 2.7 vs 2.9 and what should I look out for?
Thanks!
Ive now decided to buy a very good condition 987 Boxster for around £15k. Would like a manual and happy with a 2.7 or 2.9. A lower performance manual convertible appeals.
I would probably keep it for a while and will keep it in good condition, hopefully retaining its value. Won’t feel as guilty not using a £15k car much vs the £70k nearly new Cayman!
I understand only the 3.4S is the one that can have engine issues? Any advice on 2.7 vs 2.9 and what should I look out for?
Thanks!
I had a 987 2.7 Boxster for about 8 years and funnily enough now have a 4.0 718 Boxster. The 987 was a brilliant car and we drove it all over Europe in the time we had it but compared with the 4.0 it will feel a lot less capable regardless of engine size and a little less modern. In our case the 987 was a manual and the 718 is PDK. I think the manual suited the 987 and PDK wasn't available until the .2 version and of course a jump to 2.9 litres on the base model.
The only other things I would point out on the 987 was that ours ran on 18" alloys and on rough roads it could get a bit crashy and uncomfortable, I'm told the 17" wheels are better but have no experience of that. The 2.7 engine is less prone to bore scoring and IMS/RMS issues but is not immune. I would highly recommend an inspection of any likely candidate prior to purchase for peace of mind and be aware that around 2006/7 there were some road tax changes which results in some manual cars (6 speeds I think) costing a lot more than others. Mine was a 2008 5 speed which was in the lower tax bracket and I was quite happy about that.
The only other thing I'd suggest is don't discount a 981 2.7. It will be incredibly familiar to you and in my opinion they sound brilliant compared to a 987 and 718 flat six especially if you get one with PSE. We also have a 981 2.7 Cayman PDK and while it's not as capable and doesn't have the more modern ICE etc. it's still a brilliant car to drive and of course is a big step up from the 987, IMS/RMS are no longer an issue and bore scoring is also incredibly rare.
We took ours up to Wales for a few days this summer and drove them back to back around the EVO Triangle and thoroughly enjoyed them both without getting carried away with speed. I'd be tempted to say that a 981 2.7 might just be the perfect Sunday morning car in today's world for the money.
The only other things I would point out on the 987 was that ours ran on 18" alloys and on rough roads it could get a bit crashy and uncomfortable, I'm told the 17" wheels are better but have no experience of that. The 2.7 engine is less prone to bore scoring and IMS/RMS issues but is not immune. I would highly recommend an inspection of any likely candidate prior to purchase for peace of mind and be aware that around 2006/7 there were some road tax changes which results in some manual cars (6 speeds I think) costing a lot more than others. Mine was a 2008 5 speed which was in the lower tax bracket and I was quite happy about that.
The only other thing I'd suggest is don't discount a 981 2.7. It will be incredibly familiar to you and in my opinion they sound brilliant compared to a 987 and 718 flat six especially if you get one with PSE. We also have a 981 2.7 Cayman PDK and while it's not as capable and doesn't have the more modern ICE etc. it's still a brilliant car to drive and of course is a big step up from the 987, IMS/RMS are no longer an issue and bore scoring is also incredibly rare.
We took ours up to Wales for a few days this summer and drove them back to back around the EVO Triangle and thoroughly enjoyed them both without getting carried away with speed. I'd be tempted to say that a 981 2.7 might just be the perfect Sunday morning car in today's world for the money.
Edited by Voodoo Blue on Sunday 27th September 19:11
and31 said:
A low mileage 3.2 is what I d go for
It is true, but I enjoy having a Porsche and participating in Porsche Club Events with my father who is elderly now, but had a Porsche for 30 years until he stopped driving. I would get the same pleasure from a £15k car than a £70k car. I also have the pleasure of owning a M3 CSL, which is pretty bonkers, so having a fairly low powered Boxster to cruise around in with the roof down is very appealing. A manual gearbox adds to it! If it doesn't get used much I won't have the guilt of not using the GTS 4.0.Voodoo Blue said:
I had a 987 2.7 Boxster for about 8 years and funnily enough now have a 4.0 718 Boxster. The 987 was a brilliant car and we drove it all over Europe in the time we had it but compared with the 4.0 it will feel a lot less capable regardless of engine size and a little less modern. In our case the 987 was a manual and the 718 is PDK. I think the manual suited the 987 and PDK wasn't available until the .2 version and of course a jump to 2.9 litres on the base model.
The only other things I would point out on the 987 was that ours ran on 18" alloys and on rough roads it could get a bit crashy and uncomfortable, I'm told the 17" wheels are better but have no experience of that. The 2.7 engine is less prone to bore scoring and IMS/RMS issues but is not immune. I would highly recommend an inspection of any likely candidate prior to purchase for peace of mind and be aware that around 2006/7 there were some road tax changes which results in some manual cars (6 speeds I think) costing a lot more than others. Mine was a 2008 5 speed which was in the lower tax bracket and I was quite happy about that.
The only other thing I'd suggest is don't discount a 981 2.7. It will be incredibly familiar to you and in my opinion they sound brilliant compared to a 987 and 718 flat six especially if you get one with PSE. We also have a 981 2.7 Cayman PDK and while it's not as capable and doesn't have the more modern ICE etc. it's still a brilliant car to drive and of course is a big step up from the 987, IMS/RMS are no longer an issue and bore scoring is also incredibly rare.
We took ours up to Wales for a few days this summer and drove them back to back around the EVO Triangle and thoroughly enjoyed them both without getting carried away with speed. I'd be tempted to say that a 981 2.7 might just be the perfect Sunday morning car in today's world for the money.
Thanks, did look at a 981, but my £15k budget is a bit tight. I would like a very good condition, reasonably low mileage car, which is £25k+. I am happy for it to feel much older and more analogue compared to the GTS.The only other things I would point out on the 987 was that ours ran on 18" alloys and on rough roads it could get a bit crashy and uncomfortable, I'm told the 17" wheels are better but have no experience of that. The 2.7 engine is less prone to bore scoring and IMS/RMS issues but is not immune. I would highly recommend an inspection of any likely candidate prior to purchase for peace of mind and be aware that around 2006/7 there were some road tax changes which results in some manual cars (6 speeds I think) costing a lot more than others. Mine was a 2008 5 speed which was in the lower tax bracket and I was quite happy about that.
The only other thing I'd suggest is don't discount a 981 2.7. It will be incredibly familiar to you and in my opinion they sound brilliant compared to a 987 and 718 flat six especially if you get one with PSE. We also have a 981 2.7 Cayman PDK and while it's not as capable and doesn't have the more modern ICE etc. it's still a brilliant car to drive and of course is a big step up from the 987, IMS/RMS are no longer an issue and bore scoring is also incredibly rare.
We took ours up to Wales for a few days this summer and drove them back to back around the EVO Triangle and thoroughly enjoyed them both without getting carried away with speed. I'd be tempted to say that a 981 2.7 might just be the perfect Sunday morning car in today's world for the money.
Edited by Voodoo Blue on Sunday 27th September 19:11
Or you could just do what I did, brave pill buy the first 987.1 3.4S Boxster you go see for 10k as it looked so good what could possibly be wrong?
It didn't smoke at cold start, didn't tap and drove great. The history was great bar a recent trip to a crap garage. Driving it home with my daughter was one of our best days ever together.
Got it borescoped and serviced at lap 911 soon after and the pictures came out perfect, no score at all on 80k miles. Sometimes going against the grain and common sense pays off.
2 months in with the confidence the engine is ok and I've changed the entire suspension including all coffin arms, drop links, mounts and arms and upgraded the shocks to koni adjustable with spyder springs (from carnewal) new manifolds as one started blowing (upgrade to 200 cell carnewal) and also had the crossover pipes and and a rear coolant leak fixed. Oh and added the IPD Plenum, induction kit and bosch GT3 throttle body along with a tune to "bring it together" now delivering a super healthy 329hp.
Pretty confident I've not only got one of the best future proofed 987s out there, actually better in every way than stock and still true to the originals chracter, it's one of the best normally aspirated manual analogue sports cars ever made for ~16k.
The other way would have been buying a super low miles version for the same total price but likely would need most that work doing anyway given the age. I'd have higher miles with condition and provenance any day over an aesthetically perfect low miles garage queen with gaps and questions.
It didn't smoke at cold start, didn't tap and drove great. The history was great bar a recent trip to a crap garage. Driving it home with my daughter was one of our best days ever together.
Got it borescoped and serviced at lap 911 soon after and the pictures came out perfect, no score at all on 80k miles. Sometimes going against the grain and common sense pays off.
2 months in with the confidence the engine is ok and I've changed the entire suspension including all coffin arms, drop links, mounts and arms and upgraded the shocks to koni adjustable with spyder springs (from carnewal) new manifolds as one started blowing (upgrade to 200 cell carnewal) and also had the crossover pipes and and a rear coolant leak fixed. Oh and added the IPD Plenum, induction kit and bosch GT3 throttle body along with a tune to "bring it together" now delivering a super healthy 329hp.
Pretty confident I've not only got one of the best future proofed 987s out there, actually better in every way than stock and still true to the originals chracter, it's one of the best normally aspirated manual analogue sports cars ever made for ~16k.
The other way would have been buying a super low miles version for the same total price but likely would need most that work doing anyway given the age. I'd have higher miles with condition and provenance any day over an aesthetically perfect low miles garage queen with gaps and questions.
Edited by tenmantaylor on Sunday 27th September 23:31
Edited by tenmantaylor on Sunday 27th September 23:35
Gassing Station | Boxster/Cayman | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff