RE: Subaru Tribeca | Shed of the Week
RE: Subaru Tribeca | Shed of the Week
Today

Subaru Tribeca | Shed of the Week

Four driven wheels, five auto gears, six flat cylinders, seven seats and, er, £800 VED for another Shed newbie


Another SOTW debutant this week with the first appearance of the challengingly styled Subaru Tribeca. Tribecas were built in Indiana, which as the brainier ones amongst you will know is not in India. To attach some bohemian appeal to it, the car was named after a Manhattan neighbourhood famed for its population of artists, actors, authors and other undesirables. Referencing its location between Canal Street and Broadway, TriBeCa was an abbreviation of Triangle Below Canal. If you were discussing Mrs Shed's personal geography it would of course be Triangle Above Canal, but that's another kettle of fish. 

Our 2006 car is a first-year example of Subaru's poorly timed attempt to cash in on the all-wheel drive midsized SUV market. Despite being hamstrung by its reliance on engine displacement rather than turbocharging for its power, and then being booted in the metaphorical nuts by the global financial crash of 2008, the Tribeca somehow managed to limp on until 2014. Not many were sold in the UK in those eight years, so this is now a rare model, one website reckoning there are only a hundred or so registered cars left. As such the Tribeca's first SOTW appearance might also be its last. Shed could only find one other example on sale, a Cat S 100,000-miler with a £2,995 price tag, but other than that this is your only choice. 

The Tribeca was available in two seating formats, with five perches in the SE5 or, a Subaru first, seven in the SE7. Our Shed is an SE7, which was also Subaru code for telling you that your children would have to stop growing once they reached the age of seven because there wouldn't be enough legroom for them after that in either of the two back rows.

The ad says the seven-seat Trib comfortably seats five passengers, which it might do if you moved the sliding second row back as far as it went and threw the back row into the skip, but not everyone will consider that level of legwork economically worthwhile in a £1,995 vehicle. Quite where you'd fit your luggage in the titchy space behind the last row was not clear. Whether the driver was any better off than the rest of his miserable luggageless brood was also debatable on account of the steering column not being height-adjustable.

The 3.0-litre flat-six petrol unit in this Subaru delivered 241hp, 219lb ft and a wonderfully unfashionable 23mpg. The 3.0 turned out to be the economy model, in fact, as it was upgraded in 2007 to a 3.6 with 256hp/247lb ft. The seven-seater was lardy at over 1,900kg. With only a hunty old five-speed automatic transmission connecting the engine to the wheels, pre-update cars needed the best part of 10 seconds to hit 62mph from rest. You might be able to squeeze a few more mpg out of it but there'll be no wiggle room on the max tax rating of £790 a year. 

The ad says it's ULEZ compliant but one of Shed's various scraps of information printed off tinternet says it's Euro 4. Do your own research, but looking ahead to a glorious future there's a fair chance that you won't be able to drive it in any town bigger than Basildon without paying extra for the privilege. 

UK-spec Tribecas were OK on the inside if you didn't care about having lots of shiny metal in your eyeline. They came with leather, electronically adjustable front seats, cruise, air con, sat nav, sunroof, a reversing camera and switchable traction control, but not a height-adjustable steering column. The pics are taken from quite far away and in dappled sunlight, sometimes with a wide angle lens to big up the useable space. That makes it harder than usual for Shed to spot any imperfections, but even he can see the dints on the rear bumper. He can also see a front end that puts him in mind of Ron Mael, the keyboard player out of Sparks. There's a ZA badge on the back so keep your nose peeled for any telltale whiffs of biltong.

Talking of bad smells, head gaskets are known for failing on these engines, leading to overheating and/or oil leaks. The transmission, rear suspension and power steering can also give trouble. The MOT history suggests that this 104,000-mile car might have already had its gaskets replaced because a leak that was noticed in 2024 had been sorted in time for the 2025 test. MOT testers spotted suspension wear and rust in those same two years, but this April they weren't able to notice anything whatsoever wrong with it, which is a sign of either lots of money having been spent on it - some kind of miracle - or something else that PH's lawyers won't let Shed talk about.


See the original advert

Author
Discussion

tomsugden

Original Poster:

2,461 posts

256 months

Not even with your thanks, hideous.

JRaj

128 posts

101 months

Challenging looks in and out. Heavy and slow too considering the 6 pot under the hood.

el romeral

2,086 posts

165 months

Gone already?

Every panel has had a whack!

oilit

2,802 posts

206 months

I think for the first time ever in sotw - words fail me.

I have absolutely no words for this.

Mrs Shed triangle being above her canal and kettles of fish - that brings up all sorts of giggles and images lol

As an aside, why does shed only find sheds sold by dealers, surely private sellers must have sheds for sale within the pistonheads classifieds?

Edited by oilit on Friday 21st August 06:23

Art Keller

887 posts

107 months

That face would make an onion cry

The Dictator

1,485 posts

168 months

Absolutely no redeeming features whatsoever - up there for worst shed of the week ever perchance?

marcom44

50 posts

132 months

Horrid in every way Come on PistonHeads you can do better ….

wistec1

789 posts

69 months

Outstandingly crapulous. A wonderful specimen of automotive turd laced with risk. The epitome of SOW.

FrankandLynn

88 posts

21 months

An uncommon example of where rarity does not equal desirability. As others have said, no discernible redeeming features and a money-pit waiting to rinse your wallet. Walk past briskly.

S600BSB

8,165 posts

134 months

An unimpressive vehicle.

Escort3500

13,421 posts

173 months

It really shouldn’t grace the SOTW pages.

Dreadful thing

fozzymandeus

1,096 posts

174 months

These don’t get enough hate.

Bill

58,352 posts

283 months

Ok, as someone who's actually owned one...

The Dictator said:
Absolutely no redeeming features whatsoever - up there for worst shed of the week ever perchance?
Ish. Fundamentally it's an Outback underneath.

And the legroom isn't that bad. I've had 4 6ft adults and 3 10-12-y-o kids in it for short journeys (including 1 up a steep rutted farm track where it impressed everyone.)

And it's not bad to hustle down a b-road. And they sound good, particularly with a stainless exhaust.

But it's ugly, drinks fuel, the gearbox is beyond dim-witted and better used as an automated manual, it's ugly, pretty slow and mine had an intermittent misfire we couldn't get to the bottom of and the oil pump was leaking.

And it's pretty fking ugly.

But once you're in it you don't have to look at it. So that's nice! biggrin

Nigel_O

3,816 posts

247 months

Ssangyong - “behold - the Rodius - the ugliest car on earth”

Subaru - “Hold my beer…”

Puddenchucker

5,747 posts

246 months

I thought this might be fun, in a masochistic way, as a winter beater but then I realised it's £790 per year road-tax....

Portofino

5,332 posts

219 months

Squint hard enough and there is Porsche Cayenne vibes from the front & Focus estate vibes at the back!

That’s about it though for this oddball.


Andy86GT

1,065 posts

93 months

Art Keller said:
That face would make an onion cry
Clearly the designer hadn't heard of, or ever seen, the similarly hideous failure know as the Edsel.

Iamnotkloot

1,899 posts

175 months

As others have said, it’s gotta be up there for one of the worst sheds of the week, ever.

WPA

14,556 posts

142 months

That is awful

Salamura

543 posts

109 months

Wow, spectacularly bad. I don't even mind the looks that much as modern SUVs have normalised ugly and bad proportioned designs. But I don't know what Subaru were thinking when they brought this to Europe. Maybe 2 tonnes, a 5 speed auto and woeful fuel consumption are OK in the US, but who would want one here? Even less so now when it's a shed. Pass.