Police arrest stabbing victim
Author
Discussion

BunkMoreland

Original Poster:

4,008 posts

32 months

Thursday 14th May
quotequote all
WTAF is going on!

https://www.thurrockgazette.co.uk/news/26106975.ch...

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/India/sikh-man-stab...


Southampton officers need to be sacked for that! Cant believe that there wasn't a st load of blood evident from the victim!

Sounds a lot like the Police in Rotherham who didn't want to arrest for fear of being called Racists rolleyes

JoshSm

3,961 posts

62 months

Thursday 14th May
quotequote all
There was a thread but someone moaned about checking facts and it evaporated.

irc

9,524 posts

161 months

Thursday 14th May
quotequote all
JoshSm said:
There was a thread but someone moaned about checking facts and it evaporated.
Facts checked.

"Mr Lobbenberg said: “He didn’t seek help for the man he had injured with his sizeable knife, instead he accused him of being a racist and being drunk.”

He added that police initially handcuffed Mr Nowak and started giving him first aid when he then collapsed."



https://www.itv.com/news/meridian/2026-05-14/man-k...

sparta6

4,749 posts

125 months

Thursday 14th May
quotequote all
That all seems fine. Tradition trumps the Law


The prosecutor said as well as the shastar – the Punjabi word for weapon or knife – which had a 21cm blade, Digwa had a kirpan knife around his neck and under his clothing.

He said: “Sikhism obliges male followers of the faith to carry and wear certain items, these include a wooden comb, a metal bangle and what is called a kirpan, a ceremonial knife.

“That small kirpan satisfies any religious obligation a Sikh may have to carry a blade and Mr Vickrum Digwa was carrying that under his clothing and around his neck.”

He added: “Mr Digwa was choosing to carry on the streets of Southampton a very large 21cm bladed knife.”

Richard-390a0

3,343 posts

116 months

Friday 15th May
quotequote all
I find it interesting the way this story is being framed by some parts of the media. If you can get passed the paywall, apparently the student was filming the Sikh chap & then apparently knocked his turban off. Which to me puts a different spin on it rather than a random stabbing for no reason. (Not that either action is reasonable ((knocking Sikh's turbans off or stabbing turban tippers)))

https://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/26107850.first-da...

Edited by Richard-390a0 on Friday 15th May 11:12

Earthdweller

18,467 posts

151 months

Friday 15th May
quotequote all
Context is key and without knowing the facts it's wrong to jump to conclusions

Fwiw I've handcuffed and arrested a victim of a stabbing who was equally to blame for the fracas that caused it

It was only subsequently feeling a damp patch on his back, his breathing starting to go shallow that we investigated and found a puncture wound into a lung

He didn't tell us he'd been stabbed just said he'd been punched

He wasn't cooperative and we had to move from detention to life saving as a priority

Fortunately he didn't die

Policing isn't easy but its very easy to sit and say cudda, wudda, shudda

valiant

13,649 posts

185 months

Friday 15th May
quotequote all
Nah, it easier to call for the coppers to be sacked first rather than wait for the full story to come out.

dxg

10,308 posts

285 months

Friday 15th May
quotequote all
sparta6 said:
That all seems fine. Tradition trumps the Law


The prosecutor said as well as the shastar the Punjabi word for weapon or knife which had a 21cm blade, Digwa had a kirpan knife around his neck and under his clothing.

He said: Sikhism obliges male followers of the faith to carry and wear certain items, these include a wooden comb, a metal bangle and what is called a kirpan, a ceremonial knife.

That small kirpan satisfies any religious obligation a Sikh may have to carry a blade and Mr Vickrum Digwa was carrying that under his clothing and around his neck.

He added: Mr Digwa was choosing to carry on the streets of Southampton a very large 21cm bladed knife.
Strange how Scots are no longer allowed to wear our traditional sgian-dubh although, to be fair, there's not much point without a kilt.

butchstewie

64,832 posts

235 months

Friday 15th May
quotequote all
Earthdweller said:
Context is key and without knowing the facts it's wrong to jump to conclusions

Fwiw I've handcuffed and arrested a victim of a stabbing who was equally to blame for the fracas that caused it

It was only subsequently feeling a damp patch on his back, his breathing starting to go shallow that we investigated and found a puncture wound into a lung

He didn't tell us he'd been stabbed just said he'd been punched

He wasn't cooperative and we had to move from detention to life saving as a priority

Fortunately he didn't die

Policing isn't easy but its very easy to sit and say cudda, wudda, shudda
Exactly.

Sport_Turismo_GTS

3,833 posts

54 months

Friday 15th May
quotequote all
dxg said:
Strange how Scots are no longer allowed to wear our traditional sgian-dubh although, to be fair, there's not much point without a kilt.
I thought a sgian-dubh was permitted to be worn as part of ceremonial dress (by Celts, note, not just by Scots).

dxg

10,308 posts

285 months

Friday 15th May
quotequote all
It's still a bladed article.

These days, you'll find they're combs with just the traditional handle from the knife.

dundarach

6,089 posts

253 months

Friday 15th May
quotequote all
The country's obsession with race\religion\sex ism will be our downfall as it's so very easily manipulated by the unscrupulous.

It's already delivered us a generation of scared individuals who lack any responsibility for making their own opinions and it's about to deliver us a Government built upon the fears of the last generation believing their no longer allowed to do or think anything.




Vanden Saab

17,586 posts

99 months

Friday 15th May
quotequote all
Richard-390a0 said:
I find it interesting the way this story is being framed by some parts of the media. If you can get passed the paywall, apparently the student was filming the Sikh chap & then apparently knocked his turban off. Which to me puts a different spin on it rather than a random stabbing for no reason. (Not that either action is reasonable ((knocking Sikh's turbans off or stabbing turban tippers)))

https://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/26107850.first-da...

Edited by Richard-390a0 on Friday 15th May 11:12
That is the stabbers story, somebody who got his mum to hide the murder weapon amongst other weapons at their house.

irc

9,524 posts

161 months

Friday 15th May
quotequote all
dxg said:
Strange how Scots are no longer allowed to wear our traditional sgian-dubh although, to be fair, there's not much point without a kilt.
We are, but only when wearing the kilt.

"(5)Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (4) above, it shall be a defence for a person charged with an offence under subsection (1) above to [F4show] that he had the article with him—

(a)for use at work;

(b)for religious reasons; or

(c)as part of any national costume."

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/39/secti...

Or

" Similarly if it could be proved that the item was for use at work, part of a national costume (such as a skean dhu) or being carried for religious reasons."

https://www.prosecutioninspectorate.scot/publicati...

MrBogSmith

5,436 posts

59 months

Friday 15th May
quotequote all
Those original articles are painfully written.

Agreed with Earthdweller - clothing (it was December) can mask obvious serious wounds. And it's not uncommon for offenders to be injured.

Who knows what the scene was like when they attended? Doubt the OP considered it in a desperate attempt to make it into some racial bias thing.

dxg

10,308 posts

285 months

Friday 15th May
quotequote all
irc said:
dxg said:
Strange how Scots are no longer allowed to wear our traditional sgian-dubh although, to be fair, there's not much point without a kilt.
We are, but only when wearing the kilt.

"(5)Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (4) above, it shall be a defence for a person charged with an offence under subsection (1) above to [F4show] that he had the article with him

(a)for use at work;

(b)for religious reasons; or

(c)as part of any national costume."

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/39/secti...

Or

" Similarly if it could be proved that the item was for use at work, part of a national costume (such as a skean dhu) or being carried for religious reasons."

https://www.prosecutioninspectorate.scot/publicati...
Well, as a Scot, that's news to me!

MrBogSmith

5,436 posts

59 months

Elon has certainty latched on to this one to push his agenda, like the cretin he is.

Re-Tweeting to millions of people stupid statements like "state authorities assisted a foreigner stabbing him to death", and the police "attacked him", and for some reason drawling parallels with the murder of George Floyd.





gotoPzero

20,189 posts

214 months

I expect the police to detain and if necessary arrest the offender even if they are injured (although in this case I expect it was less obvious he was injured) they should be dealt with.

Victims who have used force to defend themselves should not be automatically arrested. Thats the whole point of self defence.
Until the basic facts are established then everyone is detained.

As for this case, we simply dont know but I expect the police used the information they had.

Whilst you expect blood everywhere if someone is stabbed or shot it does not always happen that way. When Ronald Reagan was shot at close range he was bundled into the car and driven off and it was assumed he was not hit because he was fine and talking and there was no blood. But a couple of minutes later he was unresponsive and had actually been shot.



MrBogSmith

5,436 posts

59 months

No one, least of all Elon, have any idea what the police faced at the scene.

So many variables and unknowns.

Details like that don't matter when people can't wait to weaponise the matter.

Was the offender even a 'foreigner'? Reports have said he's British.