Northern Rock Consent to let
Northern Rock Consent to let
Author
Discussion

jimothy

Original Poster:

5,151 posts

267 months

Wednesday 12th October 2005
quotequote all
I'm thinking about buying a new house and letting my flat out. My mortgage is with Northern Rock. They're sending me a 'Consent To Let' application, which I have to send back (with the obligatory fee, of course) and they'll either approve or reject it.

Has anyone ever done this before? Does anyone know what their criteria for acceptance/rejection is?

Cheers

jimothy

Original Poster:

5,151 posts

267 months

Wednesday 12th October 2005
quotequote all
Bump.

Anyone?

siwil1

1,022 posts

261 months

Wednesday 12th October 2005
quotequote all
they should be ok with it as long as the rent covers the mortgage payment

JonRB

80,067 posts

302 months

Wednesday 12th October 2005
quotequote all
A mortgage company will only want to know 2 things

1) Will it affect your ability to pay? (of minor concern unless your circumstances have changed)
2) Can they get rid of the tenants if they need to reposess your house?

It's (2) that is of most concern to them (and therefore you). They'll want to see an Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreement which will give you rights to throw your tenants out if your house is being reposessed. They don't want you to have sitting tenants that can't be evicted and thus prevent them from reposessing.

That's about it really. The fee is just an excuse to shaft you some more - there isn't really much extra work for them other than assessing your tenants Agreement.

>> Edited by JonRB on Wednesday 12th October 18:08

Incorrigible

13,668 posts

291 months

Wednesday 12th October 2005
quotequote all
If you're renting the whole place out you'll need a proper BTL comercial mortgage, they run at about 1% more than a domestic one

even if your current mortgage company are OK with you doing this I suspect you'll find it hard getting another mortgage without changing this ones type

If that made any sense

>> edited to say, did you tell them that you were going to buy somewhere else, or did you just ask whther you could rent the current place out ?

Like I said, you can only have one domestic mortgage

>> Edited by Incorrigible on Wednesday 12th October 18:27

JonRB

80,067 posts

302 months

Wednesday 12th October 2005
quotequote all
Not necessarily, Ben. Many mortgage lenders are happy for you to rent out on an ordinary mortgage provided they give permission. It's just that in many instances it doesn't make sense for the landlord to do it for long, as it makes it hard from them to get an additional traditional mortgage, so in the long term it is better to remortgage with a Buy-To-Let mortgage (easy to get if you have tenants in already) and then get a traditional mortgage for your main house. However, in the short term it is a solution.

Edit: Just seen your edit. Not strictly true. You can have more than one tradtional mortgage, but they won't lend anything more than they would for one. So if, for example, you had a borrowing capacity of £250k and you had a £120k mortgage already, the most they'd lend you on a second would be £130k (which is about as much use as an aqualung on a donkey).

>> Edited by JonRB on Wednesday 12th October 18:35

minimax

11,985 posts

286 months

Wednesday 12th October 2005
quotequote all
just quickly, what inc. is on about is let-to-buy rather than BTL and is how many amateur property empires are built...also, the way to get round this when it comes to remortgage time is to switch back to residential and then pick up the consent to let form from NR again..I know it incurs another fee but work it out against the higher interest rate and fees of their BTL products...

PS NR only want to know if the rent will cover the mortgage at 6% flat on interest only.

PPS I used to work for them in this respect, and I currently deal with them daily - any questions you have I am happy for you to mail them to me

>> Edited by minimax on Wednesday 12th October 19:03

KingRichard

10,146 posts

262 months

Wednesday 12th October 2005
quotequote all
minimax said:
just quickly, what inc. is on about is let-to-buy rather than BTL and is how many amateur property empires are built...also, the way to get round this when it comes to remortgage time is to switch back to residential and then pick up the consent to let form from NR again..I know it incurs another fee but work it out against the higher interest rate and fees of their BTL products...

PS NR only want to know if the rent will cover the mortgage at 6% flat on interest only.

PPS I used to work for them in this respect, and I currently deal with them daily - any questions you have I am happy for you to mail them to me

>> Edited by minimax on Wednesday 12th October 19:03


Still in the office chum?

Yep, Northern Rock only need the rent to cover the interest portion of your monthly payments... regardless of wether its I/O or repayment.

Cheers

Dave

mikef

6,158 posts

281 months

Wednesday 12th October 2005
quotequote all
jimothy said:
I'm thinking about buying a new house and letting my flat out. My mortgage is with Northern Rock. ...Has anyone ever done this before?
Yes
jimothy said:
Does anyone know what their criteria for acceptance/rejection is?
No, but it was fairly painless - the mortgage was transfered to a different NR department (commercial or something like that) who seemed to understand the process well.

Different (slightly higher) mortgage rate, as I lost my 5-year fix through changing

jimothy

Original Poster:

5,151 posts

267 months

Thursday 13th October 2005
quotequote all
Thanks guys.

Minimax - YHM