MG IM5 Performance
Author
Discussion

Emptygarage

Original Poster:

323 posts

168 months

Tuesday 3rd February
quotequote all
MG have very kindly given me use of this for the week.

First impressions.

Not a fan of the blue - needs to be black or grey.
Lacking aggression - it could learn a thing or two from the M3P performance (spoiler and wheels)
The rear window is tiny.
It's fast, really really fast!
It's too soft and the steering is light, even in sport mode.
The interior feels really plush, properly thick floor mats and the middle screen give it a premium feel.
Love the 4ws, particularly at low speeds it's really easy to manoeuvre (although anything is good compared to a 5N).
At £48,500 it's an absolute bargain

I'm definitely getting old! I suspect the Long Range version is better. Yes it has 741bhp but it doesn't make you want to drive it quick




malaccamax

1,558 posts

253 months

Tuesday 3rd February
quotequote all
How much power?? The saloon definitely looks better than the SUV but the big problem for my dull family needs is the tiny boot. Common problem though. Don't the Chinese put anything in the boot??

Emptygarage

Original Poster:

323 posts

168 months

Tuesday 3rd February
quotequote all
Only 741 bhp!

This has a fairly decent sized boot.

Pistonheadsdicoverer

1,057 posts

68 months

Tuesday 3rd February
quotequote all
Emptygarage said:
Only 741 bhp!

This has a fairly decent sized boot.
Normal version is £351 on 23+1 atm

I wonder whether it is better than the BYD Seal.

Emptygarage

Original Poster:

323 posts

168 months

Tuesday 3rd February
quotequote all
Assuming that's CH?

This is £570 per month, fully insured and maintained with nothing upfront on a 3 year deal.

Pistonheadsdicoverer

1,057 posts

68 months

Tuesday 3rd February
quotequote all
Emptygarage said:
Assuming that's CH?

This is £570 per month, fully insured and maintained with nothing upfront on a 3 year deal.
yes, it is a CH. i checked Tusker (my SS provider), it is on £605 (5K miles).

I just checked the performance on CH and it comes up as £539!!! No brainer if you can get a SS from your provider.

Skodillac

8,834 posts

52 months

Tuesday 3rd February
quotequote all
malaccamax said:
How much power?? The saloon definitely looks better than the SUV but the big problem for my dull family needs is the tiny boot. Common problem though. Don't the Chinese put anything in the boot??
Aren't these cars hatchbacks rather than booted saloons?

Pistonheadsdicoverer

1,057 posts

68 months

Tuesday 3rd February
quotequote all
Skodillac said:
Aren't these cars hatchbacks rather than booted saloons?
From Google

The MG IM5 is significantly larger than the Tesla Model 3, measuring 4,931 mm in length, which is 211 mm longer than the Tesla Model 3 (4,724 mm). The IM5 also boasts a wider body (1,960 mm vs ~1,850 mm) and a taller stature (1,474 mm vs 1,441 mm), offering a more substantial, BMW 5 Series-sized footprint compared to the Model 3's compact executive feel.

Emptygarage

Original Poster:

323 posts

168 months

Tuesday 3rd February
quotequote all
Skodillac said:
Aren't these cars hatchbacks rather than booted saloons?
Correct

OctiMoron

39 posts

123 months

Tuesday 3rd February
quotequote all
Anytime I see the IM brand logo on these, it just reminds me of this 80's throw back TV ident for Warner Bros that used to accompany the start of an episode of Dukes of Hazard. Simpler times!!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgPvep24s58&pp...

TheDeuce

31,170 posts

88 months

Tuesday 3rd February
quotequote all
Do these have adaptive suspension? Seems a lot of power for something described as soft feeling.

I'm all for big power EV's, but with the weight of an EV I feel that advanced suspension and damping really is crucial to unlock the potential of the power. Power is easy for EV's, I think for some brands it's become a substitute for good chassis engineering.


confused_buyer

7,054 posts

203 months

Tuesday 3rd February
quotequote all
What's the consumption like? Some reports have them with some quite poor figures which means despite a huge battery the real world range enda up less than mid range Model 3 with far smaller battery.

Animal

5,639 posts

290 months

Wednesday 4th February
quotequote all
I've been considering an IM5 for a while and test drove a Long Range (single motor version) a while back.

Comfy inside although the rear window is very silly and there's no full-time rear view camera. You can actually fold the rear view mirror up out of the way because it's so pointless. The park assist etc does seem really good.

It's a hatchback but has no parcel shelf so anything in the boot is in view (although not through the rear screen, obviously). I think I'd probably get fed up with hearing things sliding round in the boot pretty quickly.

No adaptive suspension I think, except on the IM6 Performance Launch Edition.

The Performance version is 4WD and has a dedicated snow mode, which would probably be useful for a couple of days every few years, but the version I drove with 400bhp or so would still do 0-60 in 5 seconds or so so is easily quick enough for most people.

jinba-ittai

1,323 posts

232 months

Wednesday 4th February
quotequote all
Emptygarage said:
Assuming that's CH?

This is £570 per month, fully insured and maintained with nothing upfront on a 3 year deal.
Still quite a lot more than the AWD Seal

(which has to make do with only 500 horsepower)

Emptygarage

Original Poster:

323 posts

168 months

Friday 6th February
quotequote all
So that's more in-line with the Long Range variant which works out cheaper on the examples i've seen

C.A.R.

3,990 posts

210 months

Friday 6th February
quotequote all
96.5 kWh usable battery is pretty mental - no wonder it's ~ 4-500kg heavier than a Model 3!

How would that work with overnight charging? Aren't cheap tariffs becoming limited to 6 hours now? So you'd only get a 40% charge overnight on the lower tariff / 7p per kWh. That will surely affect the actual running cost - unless you get free charging at work etc.


kambites

70,644 posts

243 months

Friday 6th February
quotequote all
C.A.R. said:
How would that work with overnight charging? Aren't cheap tariffs becoming limited to 6 hours now? So you'd only get a 40% charge overnight on the lower tariff / 7p per kWh. That will surely affect the actual running cost - unless you get free charging at work etc.
Only an issue if you routinely do several hundred miles a day, several days in a row. Otherwise 40% of a battery that large per night is plenty.

ChocolateFrog

34,954 posts

195 months

Friday 6th February
quotequote all
C.A.R. said:
96.5 kWh usable battery is pretty mental - no wonder it's ~ 4-500kg heavier than a Model 3!

How would that work with overnight charging? Aren't cheap tariffs becoming limited to 6 hours now? So you'd only get a 40% charge overnight on the lower tariff / 7p per kWh. That will surely affect the actual running cost - unless you get free charging at work etc.
You'd have to be doing well over 100 miles per day for that to be an issue.

I guess if you're a taxi driver or similar then 3 phase might actually pay for itself in a year or two.

Assuming these can AC charge at 22kw.