RE: Jaguar X-Type 3.0 V6 Estate | Shed of the Week
RE: Jaguar X-Type 3.0 V6 Estate | Shed of the Week
Yesterday

Jaguar X-Type 3.0 V6 Estate | Shed of the Week

The compact wagon was the first Jaguar designed by one Ian Callum - X factor enough for you?


For this week’s sub-£2k smasher Shed was drawn, Magpie-like, to a bright and shiny Peugeot 208 GTI. Then he remembered some of the mechanical issues with the pre-facelift 208 GTIs, so he made the perfectly sensible decision to switch to this Jag, which, as we all know, is a problem-free marque ha ha. 

As those of you with functioning peepers will note it is an X400 X-Type Estate. The saloon was designed by a team led by Geoff Lawson, who was also responsible for the XJ220, a nice one of which has just been bought by ex-Stig Ben Collins. The estate, however, was penned by Ian Callum. It was the first Jaguar to slide off his drawing board, and although 25 years have passed since X-Type production began it still looks good today, especially with it being a pre-facelift model with more chrome and less front-end blobbiness than the last cars.

The X-Type didn’t quite hit the 100,000 a year sales target that Jaguar was hoping and probably praying for, but they did shift 350,000 of them over an eight-year run, not bad considering it was competing against the BMW 3 Series and Merc C-Class. Not to mention the Ford Mondeo, whose front-wheel drive platform it borrowed and adapted to run with all four wheels driven on a 40/60 front/rear split. Our shed is a 2004 example, which might mean it doesn’t have the viscous coupling that was dropped for cars in that model year. With luck however our car will have the Dynamic Stability Control that made up for the lack of that LSD function, sort of.  

The variably valve-timed 3.0-litre AJ-V6 engine that we have here was the one to go for as it produced a noticeable amount of extra horsepower (25, but it felt like more) than the 2.5 V6, with very little difference in the fuel consumption figure (27 instead of 29mpg). When new, the 0-60mph time for this estate was in the low 7s and it was meant to top 140mph.

Although we can’t see it in the pics, the estate was supposed to come with a 320-watt Alpine audio system along with all the other bits and bobs, like real wood, that Jaguar owners had come to expect. This one even has the Smoker’s Pack, surely something to brag about in these nannying times as long as previous owners didn’t stink the cabin out by taking advantage of it, of course.

There’s a little scuffing to our car’s rear bumper but otherwise it looks good to go for a fair bit longer as the odometer is yet to reach six figures. If you’re the next owner you will need to keep an eye on the fluid level in the auto box despite Jaguar’s assurances that it was sealed for life. The same goes for the transfer box that only had a small amount of fluid in it to start with so it couldn’t stand to lose much before it blew up.

According to the last MOT a month or so ago there’s a smattering of so far non-threatening brownage in all corners of the suspension. If you felt the urge to replace the affected parts, new rear coil springs are under £40 each, and if it’s the drop links the MOT tester was on about at the front of the car they’re about the same money as that or less. 

Shed is assuming that the metalwork attached to the roof rails is a dealer sales aid rather than some sort of adventure rack, but as ever he stands ready to be corrected on that, as he does on the annual tax bill that for a 254g/km petrol car comes out as – oh. For some reason, the Govt insists on keeping this information secret unless you’ve got the 11-digit V5C reference number, so we’ll have to rely once more on the dog-eared sheet pinned to the door of Shed’s workshop. That says £735. Look at it this way though, if the CO2 had been 256g/km the bill would have been £760, so you’re saving £25 there, hurray! Better still, if you look at Parkers you can save even more as they reckon it’s only £430 - double hurray!


See the original advert

Author
Discussion

Master Bean

Original Poster:

4,806 posts

141 months

Yesterday (00:50)
quotequote all
Mondeo Estate.

Mad Maximus

788 posts

24 months

Yesterday (01:11)
quotequote all
Great cars, great looking in estate form, great engine just keep on top of the sills and they are fantastic.

uktrailmonster

9,321 posts

221 months

Yesterday (01:13)
quotequote all
I had the saloon version of this as a company car in 2004. I was in my mid 30s back then and this thing instantly doubled my age! It was comfortable but all pipe and slippers. The interior was hideous. The engine so-so. I swapped it out for a Mondeo and returned back to my 30s.

Muddle238

4,313 posts

134 months

Yesterday (01:48)
quotequote all
8 years ago I was looking for a British estate shed, at the time it was a toss up between one of these or a Rover 75 Tourer. Ended up with the latter, which I still have, however each time I pass an X-Type estate out in the wild I never regret my choice. I found that at the time, most Jags were basket cases, or were council estate spec, I imagine nowadays that's even more likely the case.

Never bought into the idea it was just a Mondeo in a frock, always believed it to be a majority Jag.

leef44

5,130 posts

174 months

Yesterday (01:53)
quotequote all
I do like these. They have the platform and handling of a Mondeo but the interior is a traditional plush Jaguar.

carinaman

24,090 posts

193 months

Yesterday (02:04)
quotequote all
Authentic Jaguar headlining.

chirurgus

417 posts

237 months

Yesterday (05:53)
quotequote all
As the post mistress will attest, the X Type has an unpleasantly hard and slippery rear seat that offers nothing to brace against if the driver becomes overenthusiastic.

el romeral

1,872 posts

158 months

Yesterday (06:39)
quotequote all
Great shed and a good looking luxury load lugger. A few bits could be tidied up to make it better still. Predictable Mondeo comments are out in force.

Taz73

357 posts

33 months

Yesterday (06:43)
quotequote all
I like these, rear always reminded me of a Volvo V40, great looking cars that drove really well, never understood the negativity around the mondeo connection, the mondeo was the best car in class, so basing it on that platform was surely a good thing, the S class was a Lincoln and until facelift wasn’t rated as a great drivers car, the X was great from the off. Another competitor was the A4, it using Golf and Passat bits as far as I am aware, never hurt it, how was that any better?

V88Dicky

7,361 posts

204 months

Yesterday (07:09)
quotequote all
If it s a 54 plate as the pictures suggest, it s £430 per year currently, not £735. That would be a post 23/3/06 car.

I ran a 2005 3.0 manual (saloon) between 2013 and 2016 and it still ranks as one of my favourite daily drivers I ve owned.

Competent handling, surefooted in all weathers and a decent performer. Regular maintenance but no reliability issues.


Oh, and the sills were completely solid, before anyone asks smile


ETA, it’s still going strong on 100k plus miles

CaptainBeyond

6 posts

Yesterday (07:09)
quotequote all
Jaggggg ✅ Cream and wood Interior ✅ Estate ✅ Petrol V6 ✅ Thumping great rack ✅ Moral high ground VED ✅

Peak shedding for me

mooseracer

2,575 posts

191 months

Yesterday (07:14)
quotequote all
Master Bean said:
Mondeo Estate.
And all the better to drive for it

Slowlygettingit

846 posts

62 months

Yesterday (07:16)
quotequote all
A very handsome thing in it’s day but really dated now.
A guy at work that probably met all the lazy stereo types had a black estate with lovely large 5 spoke alloys - that looked far more individual than the sea of bland Audi a4’s and 3 series se’s we all had via the company car scheme.

richinlondon

795 posts

143 months

Yesterday (07:21)
quotequote all
Master Bean said:
Mondeo Estate.
Tedious statement

BeastieBoy73

762 posts

133 months

Yesterday (07:22)
quotequote all
I’m 53 and still feel far too young to be wafting around in a Jaguar, so that’s a hard no from me.
Still, fair play — it clearly has its fans.

Andy86GT

811 posts

86 months

Yesterday (07:24)
quotequote all
The estate X Type to me looked very nice, the saloons scaled down XJ appearance was a little less successful.

What really annoys me was the criticism of the Mondeo platform at the time, I remember at launch comments like 'just a Mondeo in drag'

In fact the platform was massively revised, partly to accept the standard 4WD, and from a handling perspective it was a perfect place to start.

No one criticises VAG for platform sharing, RS3 based on a Golf etc, so why did Jag get so unfairly treated confused

richinlondon

795 posts

143 months

Yesterday (07:25)
quotequote all
uktrailmonster said:
I had the saloon version of this as a company car in 2004. I was in my mid 30s back then and this thing instantly doubled my age! It was comfortable but all pipe and slippers. The interior was hideous. The engine so-so. I swapped it out for a Mondeo and returned back to my 30s.
2002 for me but same age, boy I got some p…take, had a 2.5 sport in black with wire grill and cranberry leather, looked lovely, handled and gripped well but could have done with more spec and a bit more oomph, always wished I got a 3.0. Sold it at 3 years old and noticed it was off the road by 11 I think due to structural rot

LightweightLouisDanvers

2,683 posts

64 months

Yesterday (07:30)
quotequote all
BeastieBoy73 said:
I m 53 and still feel far too young to be wafting around in a Jaguar, so that s a hard no from me.
Still, fair play it clearly has its fans.
I'm 51 and would happily waft about in a Jaguar. Always liked these, and the contemporary Rover 75 too. A bit of a deep clean of the drivers seat and steering wheel wouldn't go amiss.
Good shed this week.

JagLover

45,567 posts

256 months

Yesterday (07:33)
quotequote all
Andy86GT said:
The estate X Type to me looked very nice, the saloons scaled down XJ appearance was a little less successful.

What really annoys me was the criticism of the Mondeo platform at the time, I remember at launch comments like 'just a Mondeo in drag'

In fact the platform was massively revised, partly to accept the standard 4WD, and from a handling perspective it was a perfect place to start.

No one criticises VAG for platform sharing, RS3 based on a Golf etc, so why did Jag get so unfairly treated confused
Yes the platform was heavily revised and I think, at most, it shares 30% of parts with the Mondeo.

I haven't had the most extensive garage during my motoring life, and have spent many years driving Astras and Vectras, but the X Type 3 litre V6 is very probably the best car I have driven for performance, handling and high speed stability. My current XE is a very pleasant place to be, and does twice the mpg, but doesn't match it imo.

mooseracer

2,575 posts

191 months

Yesterday (07:36)
quotequote all
JagLover said:
Andy86GT said:
The estate X Type to me looked very nice, the saloons scaled down XJ appearance was a little less successful.

What really annoys me was the criticism of the Mondeo platform at the time, I remember at launch comments like 'just a Mondeo in drag'

In fact the platform was massively revised, partly to accept the standard 4WD, and from a handling perspective it was a perfect place to start.

No one criticises VAG for platform sharing, RS3 based on a Golf etc, so why did Jag get so unfairly treated confused
Yes the platform was heavily revised and I think, at most, it shares 30% of parts with the Mondeo.

I haven't had the most extensive garage during my motoring life, and have spent many years driving Astras and Vectras, but the X Type 3 litre V6 is very probably the best car I have driven for performance, handling and high speed stability. My current XE is a very pleasant place to be, and does twice the mpg, but doesn't match it imo.
To me it has always been a positive that it was based on the Mondeo platform, great driving cars.