Horsepower: One horsepower isn't equivalent to a horse.
Horsepower: One horsepower isn't equivalent to a horse.
Author
Discussion

Milkyway

Original Poster:

11,713 posts

74 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
James Watt invented a novelty scientific equation to impress his future clients of the power of his steam engine.

300yrs later...
A drey horse's output was measured on a dyno, via a rope & drum setup replacing the cars engine... the Dyno recorded 5hp. yikes
(The measurements were taken with the horse led at a normal walking pace).

Edited by Milkyway on Tuesday 13th January 18:31

RizzoTheRat

27,687 posts

213 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
I think it was originally based on smaller pit ponies rather than big shire horses, but it was also supposed to be an average over a long period. A horse can manage a lot more power in a short burst but over several hours work it's average output will be way smaller.

Lotobear

8,482 posts

149 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
...its a bit like one apple is not 1 Newton

Milkyway

Original Poster:

11,713 posts

74 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
RizzoTheRat said:
I think it was originally based on smaller pit ponies rather than big shire horses, but it was also supposed to be an average over a long period. A horse can manage a lot more power in a short burst but over several hours work it's average output will be way smaller.
I think that a horse can pump out about fifteen horses for a short period.
(Watts equation involved raising water over a set distance & period). confused

NB: The original 2CV (deax chevaux) @ 9hp... makes sense now.
Later ones...should have been called 6CV's.
(30hp = 150hp... in new money).


Edited by Milkyway on Tuesday 13th January 17:04

Teppic

7,859 posts

278 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
RizzoTheRat said:
I think it was originally based on smaller pit ponies rather than big shire horses, but it was also supposed to be an average over a long period. A horse can manage a lot more power in a short burst but over several hours work it's average output will be way smaller.
Ponypower didn't have quite the same ring to it.

Milkyway

Original Poster:

11,713 posts

74 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Teppic said:
Ponypower didn't have quite the same ring to it.
Acceptable for Mustangs.

spitfire-ian

4,062 posts

249 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
When you look at it this way it makes more sense.

It's the force needed to lift 550 lbs, 1 ft in 1 second.


Monkeylegend

28,212 posts

252 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Horses, like people, come in all shapes and sizes.

fooman

1,004 posts

85 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Well if horsepower doesn't mean the power of a horse perhaps we should start using a unit of power measurement we can relate to, like a Schwarzenegger.

Milkyway

Original Poster:

11,713 posts

74 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
fooman said:
Well if horsepower doesn't mean the power of a horse perhaps we should start using a unit of power measurement we can relate to, like a Schwarzenegger.
1hp = a shetland.
In reality, about 0.5hp... but this keeps it simple.
(Sorted). whistle


Edited by Milkyway on Tuesday 13th January 17:57

Rusty Old-Banger

6,334 posts

234 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
fooman said:
Well if horsepower doesn't mean the power of a horse perhaps we should start using a unit of power measurement we can relate to, like a Schwarzenegger.
10,000,000 Schwarzeneggers = 1 Norris.

Milkyway

Original Poster:

11,713 posts

74 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Rusty Old-Banger said:
10,000,000 Schwarzeneggers = 1 Norris.
Chuck or Lando...just for clarity.

Warhavernet

639 posts

8 months

Yesterday (16:35)
quotequote all
If you want a sore brain figure out the strange relationship
between the Foot-Pound [ft-pd] and the Pound-Foot [pd-ft].

Evanivitch

25,551 posts

143 months

Yesterday (16:38)
quotequote all
spitfire-ian said:
When you look at it this way it makes more sense.

It's the force needed to lift 550 lbs, 1 ft in 1 second.

People also forget this was the sustained effort of a horse working ploughing a field. It wasn't a quick, fast effort on a Dyno.

The ability of static engines to provide continuous power was their biggest attraction. If you wanted short bursts of power there were plenty of gravity solutions.

Milkyway

Original Poster:

11,713 posts

74 months

Yesterday (18:52)
quotequote all
I have just read another way of looking at it.

1hp: A horse turning a 24ft mill wheel 2.5 times in a minute
(That seems a bit more logical). rolleyes

In comparison: HumanPower
Average: 1.2hp
Athlete: 2.5hp


Edited by Milkyway on Wednesday 14th January 19:20

Simpo Two

90,721 posts

286 months

Yesterday (19:40)
quotequote all
Milkyway said:
I have just read another way of looking at it.

1hp: A horse turning a 24ft mill wheel 2.5 times in a minute
(That seems a bit more logical). rolleyes
But that doesn't include load/friction...