Nuremberg
Author
Discussion

Opapayer

Original Poster:

687 posts

6 months

No not the misspelt version of The Nurburgring, the film recently released wink

Obviously it’s a fictionalised dramatisation of the build up to and the opening Nuremberg trial of Goering and 21 other high ranking Nazis. The film itself has some big names and is well acted. Despite some fictionalisation, some of it is hugely accurate using the opening statements of the US prosecutor for example. However, the most shocking to me is the footage of the concentration camps and what the liberating forces discovered there. There are no words to describe the horrors and the evil of the people who committed these atrocities.

Without wanting to get too political, I’d suggest it should be compulsory viewing for some parts of society given the extreme views being pushed. There some scary parallels on display too. Some very apposite quotes for our times:

The only clue to what man can do is what man has done.

It happened, because people let it happen.

If you don’t want to watch the film, but want to see the real liberation footage then it’s available in multiple places on YouTube such as the link. Move to about 1:15 for the footage to start.

https://youtu.be/9NmaZlFlZGE?si=S1t_EIj3r-ahzAKO

bergclimber34

2,254 posts

14 months

Yesterday (11:13)
quotequote all
I rather enjoyed it actually, I doubt it is particularly accurate apart from certain areas, but the acting was good, the depiction of the characters was OK, but the main thing I got was this was so soon after the war and their apparent unawareness of what was going on in camps was interesting. Not surprising, but maybe also very well acted to feign knowledge.

If this portrayal of Goerring is accurate he was a formidable man

Opapayer

Original Poster:

687 posts

6 months

Yesterday (11:27)
quotequote all
Not sure I’d use the word formidable given one of the definitions includes admiration and respect, it I get your point. Rising to the top of any government requires a certain type ofmperson, but when said government is based on such evil, it takes a special type of evil to be at the sharp end. Definite psychopathic narcissist.

DeejRC

8,483 posts

103 months

Yesterday (13:05)
quotequote all
If you don’t think Hermann Goering was a formidable bloke then you have either ignored or misunderstood both the film and history. He was indeed also vain and had a jolly good steak of narcissism in him, neither of which stopped him being considered a formidably competent opponent. Of course it is also easier to be formidable when you have the likes of Galland and Moelders to call upon.

heisthegaffer

4,009 posts

219 months

Yesterday (13:08)
quotequote all
Cant wait to see this, read the book last year.

wolfracesonic

8,697 posts

148 months

Yesterday (13:21)
quotequote all
I read this a few years back, it covers similar ground but with interviews of other top level Nazis as well, The Nuremberg Interviews.

nicanary

10,877 posts

167 months

Yesterday (13:26)
quotequote all
Opapayer said:
Not sure I d use the word formidable given one of the definitions includes admiration and respect, it I get your point. Rising to the top of any government requires a certain type ofmperson, but when said government is based on such evil, it takes a special type of evil to be at the sharp end. Definite psychopathic narcissist.
His inability to tell Hitler the truth about Luftwaffe losses should have been his undoing. How he retained the Fuehrer's trust is beyond me - presumably they were all in too deep to break up the gang.

Opapayer

Original Poster:

687 posts

6 months

Yesterday (14:29)
quotequote all
DeejRC said:
If you don t think Hermann Goering was a formidable bloke then you have either ignored or misunderstood both the film and history. He was indeed also vain and had a jolly good steak of narcissism in him, neither of which stopped him being considered a formidably competent opponent. Of course it is also easier to be formidable when you have the likes of Galland and Moelders to call upon.
Read this bit again in the post you’re replying to. Formidable but not if the definition you’re choosing involves what’s below.

Opapayer said:
Not sure I’d use the word formidable given one of the definitions includes admiration and respect, but I get your point

DeejRC

8,483 posts

103 months

Yesterday (17:00)
quotequote all
nicanary said:
Opapayer said:
Not sure I d use the word formidable given one of the definitions includes admiration and respect, it I get your point. Rising to the top of any government requires a certain type ofmperson, but when said government is based on such evil, it takes a special type of evil to be at the sharp end. Definite psychopathic narcissist.
His inability to tell Hitler the truth about Luftwaffe losses should have been his undoing. How he retained the Fuehrer's trust is beyond me - presumably they were all in too deep to break up the gang.
Goering had a massive streak of ego and vanity, he also had these mega aces etc and he absolutely believed/loved his own press. The trouble is A) Hitler did to and B) Hitler was 50% to blame for Goerings failures. And Adolf wasn’t a great one for self reflection! The somewhat amusing irony, if you will, though is that the Luftwaffe was probably the force that was the most stacked with absolute talent, from individual officers to command level yet so many of them just got completely wasted in the eastern front meat grinder.