Chocolate bars are no longer actually chocolate
Discussion
I’m a total chocolate fanatic, but I noticed a while ago that I was enjoying Cadburys far less and it just didn’t taste right. I saw a video online explaining that the chocolate content had been reduced, replaced with sugar and palm oil. Haven’t eaten any since. They can still be called chocolate though as they scrape through with the minimum required amount of cocoa and milk, in amongst the other s
te.
Not wanting to be out-done, other manufacturers have lowered the bar further, and as a result they are no longer allowed to be called chocolate bars, but instead are now “chocolate flavoured” bars.
Toffee crisp and blue riband are following Penguin and Club in their race to the bottom of the s
t heap. 
A sorry state of affairs.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c79x7q325p3o.a...
te.Not wanting to be out-done, other manufacturers have lowered the bar further, and as a result they are no longer allowed to be called chocolate bars, but instead are now “chocolate flavoured” bars.
Toffee crisp and blue riband are following Penguin and Club in their race to the bottom of the s
t heap. 
A sorry state of affairs.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c79x7q325p3o.a...
butchstewie said:
Twirls too.
Had one the other day and it was just this weird slimy gloop.
I don't actually mind paying for good chocolate. I just wish there was a bit more transparency about what goes into cheaper "chocolate".
It the same with all Cadbury’s product. I gave ip buying it ages ago. Tastes rubbish, is too greasy and is overpriced. Had one the other day and it was just this weird slimy gloop.
I don't actually mind paying for good chocolate. I just wish there was a bit more transparency about what goes into cheaper "chocolate".
Edited by Evolved on Thursday 11th December 08:06
Yeah I wonder how much of it is expectations.
I'm fortunate financially and I get it lots of people aren't but I do wonder if the answer to that is to keep trying to stock B&M with "brands" that get increasingly crap or do you just charge a bit more for a quality product?
I can only assume the brands marketing people have done their homework and the former is more profitable than the latter.
I do wonder at what long term cost though.
Go to Bourneville and it's a lovely place and I'm really not sure this is what they had in mind.
I'm fortunate financially and I get it lots of people aren't but I do wonder if the answer to that is to keep trying to stock B&M with "brands" that get increasingly crap or do you just charge a bit more for a quality product?
I can only assume the brands marketing people have done their homework and the former is more profitable than the latter.
I do wonder at what long term cost though.
Go to Bourneville and it's a lovely place and I'm really not sure this is what they had in mind.
Hippea said:
Literally everything has been ruined, why are we all just putting up with reduced quality and higher prices?
Agree. Quality for nearly everything has gone down while prices have gone up. Fruit is another example, you buy what looks like decent oranges, yet a few days later they are awful dry things.I'm of an age that I remember Cadbury Diary Milk portions were chunky squares. (70's and 80's).
For a good ten years all chocolate (Cadbury, Nestle, Mars) has been truly awful.
Unfortunately I cannot get on with the European stuff so like the poster above I am now making chocolate from scratch.
It is the only way to avoid the inevitable disappointment.
For a good ten years all chocolate (Cadbury, Nestle, Mars) has been truly awful.
Unfortunately I cannot get on with the European stuff so like the poster above I am now making chocolate from scratch.
It is the only way to avoid the inevitable disappointment.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



