RE: 2026 Alpine A390 GT | PH Review
RE: 2026 Alpine A390 GT | PH Review
Thursday 4th December

2026 Alpine A390 GT | PH Review

France's answer to the Macan Electric promises class-leading handling. Does it deliver?


As a car that measures 4.6 metres in length and weighs 2.1 tonnes, the Alpine A390 can lay claim to being the most compact and lightest car in its class. Describing a battery-powered SUV as ‘light’ is stretching it a bit, of course, but next to the 2.2-tonne Hyundai Ioniq 5 N or 2.3-tonne Porsche Macan, the A390 is like Jake Paul standing face-to-face with Anthony Joshua. And when the intention is to create something that feels more agile and reactive than its main rivals, it’s easy to see how a near-10 per cent weight reduction could be seen as a performance advantage. Rivals might throw the bigger punches, but a lighter and smaller Alpine should be faster on its toes - and potentially more interesting to drive on the limit.

That’s certainly the thinking, at any rate. The A390 evolves Renault-Nissan’s AmpR Medium platform so substantially that it gets a unique three-motor electric powertrain to give each rear wheel its own power source, uses bespoke aluminium suspension arms and a much faster steering rack, as well as specific Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S tyres and Alpine’s first six-piston caliper brake setup. This is in a package with a near-perfect 49:51 weight distribution, which Alpine reckons creates an SUV that accelerates, goes around corners and stops like an A110, albeit one with more seats - and no engine.

The pricing should be pretty competitive from the off, too, with the A390 starting from an anticipated £62,000 in entry-level GT form, before rising to around £70k in more potent GTS trim. That means both the 400hp GT and 470hp GTS will rank close to their all-wheel-drive arch rivals from Porsche and Hyundai. Sure, the Porsche has more badge prowess and the Hyundai has more power, but Alpine expects the A390’s driver appeal to win over private buyers and, even more significantly given their share of the UK market, company car drivers, for which this category of EVs represents something to aspire to.

So how does it play out in the real world? On first impressions, things aren’t so clear. The A390 does - as Matt predicted when it was revealed - look better in the metal, appearing lower and sleeker, and more like the Beta concept, thanks to the illusion of lowness created by black wheel arch surrounds and GTS-spec 21-inch alloy wheels. The air channelling bonnet openings at the front of the A390 hint at high-speed performance, and the rear’s pinched lines, aerodynamic diffuser and LMDh prototype-inspired rear arch flaps are interesting, racy details. But as a coupe-SUV silhouette in 2025, it’s slightly generic, albeit handsome enough. 

The interior won’t impress everyone either. Fans of the A290’s F1-inspired wheel will be happy to see an identical solution here, with the same ‘OV’ red overtake switch, blue regenerative braking dial and black Drive Mode button. But those hoping for a complete cockpit overhaul compared to the Scenic might be disappointed to see the same dual-screen setup (which is actually very good, both tech and usability-wise), flanked by straight-lined air vents and a familiar dash shape. But look a little closer and the same level of Alpine enhancement has been applied to the A390’s front interior as was in the A290. As ever, it’s all in the details.

Alcantara and unglossed carbon fibre replace cloth and plastic on the dash, and the Scenic’s column-mounted gear selector is swapped for D(rive), N(eutral), R(everse) buttons shared with the A290. They’re located on a new centre section that cocoons the driver, and - you won’t believe this A290 and A110 owners - sports a conveniently-located cup holder, with space underneath for more storage, to go with the door bins and glovebox. As far as up-front interior space alone goes, this is a very different Alpine to what’s come before.

Since the car we’re driving in Spain is the entry-level GT, we don’t have the GTS’s standard-fit, leather-clad buckets (boo), but rather part-Alcantara chairs that are admittedly nice and supportive on the lower back, and go low enough to remain sporty in feel. I like that Alpine uses a similar dot pattern in its seat fabrics to ‘00s Clios (I would), though there is potentially a practicality hindrance in sticking with these thicker GT-spec seats…

In the back, there’s good knee room for a near six-footer, but the 89kWh battery in the floor means your legs sit higher and with a hatchback-like angle in the knee. That, and the swooping roofline above you, means it feels cramped for an SUV. At least boot space is almost identical to that of the longer Macan EV at a generous 532 litres, although unlike the Porsche, there’s no front boot thanks in part to the A390’s aerodynamic bonnet openings. Thankfully, the charge cables can be stored under the boot floor, which is handy, because the A390 generates a fair bit of lateral G-force.

With a 0-62mph time of 4.8 seconds, the 400hp GT is quick but it has nothing off the line on the ballistic Ioniq 5 N, which hauls itself to the mark a full 1.4 seconds earlier. Not surprisingly given the hype, it’s in the bends where the A390 excels. Lightweight suspension hardware, passive damping and hydraulic bump provide body control that’s taut, but not so firm that it dials out all of the chassis’s communicativeness. Sure, the steering’s devoid of feel, but the rack is quick and the 235-section Michelins provide plenty of bite. When pitched and angled at an apex, the A390 is as keen on the nose as anything in this class, although the slight drawback of that is it sometimes a bit too keen to change direction on the motorway. Moreover, on anything other than a perfectly smooth bit of tarmac, you’re always providing miniscule corrections to the car’s direction of travel. At least the steering assist tech is very good.

Alpine’s twin-motor rear setup looks properly exotic on paper because it is. Everything else in this class uses a single rear motor and a differential to split the torque, but the A390 can claim to deploy the segment’s only ‘pro-active’ torque vectoring where you really want it. Each rear wheel is powered by its own motor, but with ‘just’ 400hp to play with, the GT - even when sent squatting on its nose and flung at an apex - can’t be convinced into going fully hooligan like a 5 N. This is where the power-oversteer-capable Hyundai holds unique track day driver appeal. But that’s fine: even an A390 GT with a Track Mode is unlikely to ever venture onto a circuit. Its smaller and more subtle kicks of oversteer are there to reduce understeer, rather than send you flagrantly sideways.

Those brakes, by the way, resist fade brilliantly and the pedal is nice and progressive, even when you ramp up the regenerative braking via the blue dial. If you want to maximise the regen, there’s a one-pedal driving mode, meaning slower speed driving can be as efficient as it is effortless. Drive sensibly, and the Alpine boasts sufficient efficiency to beat the Hyundai and at least run the Macan 4 Electric close (the rear-drive Macan Electric is well out of reach), with a 345-mile claimed range. Although that’s when the GT’s got its standard-fit 20-inch alloys; with the 21s, that falls to 314 miles. At least that’s still ahead of the 278-mile Hyundai.

That range difference versus the 5 N is vital because for out-and-out thrills, the Hyundai is leagues ahead. But for anyone who feels like they might appreciate the A390’s near-optimal blend of ride comfort and high-speed body control, not to mention its three-motor powertrain and its sleek SUV-coupe design, this five-seater SUV has bags of appeal. Arguably Alpine’s biggest challenge is not convincing people of its dynamic smarts, but rather luring buyers away from a very capable (and popular) Macan 4 Electric. For the GT, that might be a fight too hard to win, but for the more potent GTS? That might be when the A390 finally enters the ring with a glint in its eye. More on that next time.


SPECIFICATION | 2026 ALPINE A390 GT

Engine: 89kWh battery, three electric motors
Transmission: Single-speed automatic, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 400
Torque (lb ft): 488
0-62mph: 4.8 seconds
Top speed: 124mph
Weight: 2,121kg
MPG: 345 miles WLTP range (314 with GTS wheels), 190kW max charge rate
CO2: 0g/km (driving), 3.9miles/kWh efficiency
Price: £62,000 (est)

Author
Discussion

SDK

Original Poster:

2,314 posts

273 months

Thursday
quotequote all
I spent some time looking at this as a potential for my next car, at the GFOS and other online reviews

Things which I don't like:
-> The infotainment screens look outdated.
-> Only one cup holder [I know, first world problems smile ]
-> The price is very punchy.

The new BMW iX3 is cheaper and winning all the spec comparisons for me. Feels like the list prices for the A390 need to be £10k cheaper - For sure, the monthly cost will determine the value.

Alpine built an SUV and took most of the usefulness of an SUV out of it irked

Ultimately this is definitely a heart over head purchase.

chrisironside

891 posts

182 months

Thursday
quotequote all
This, the Hyundai Ioniq 5 and the Porsche Macan are rivals in the same way a squash racket, a Sky Sports subscription, and an air fryer and also rivals.

Firebobby

887 posts

59 months

Thursday
quotequote all
It looks good! But, as it'll never be in my pension driven price bracket I just skipped the review, went straight to the price and turned over the virtual page!

cayman-black

13,243 posts

236 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Looks ok but i don't think i could ever buy an EV.

Hoofy

79,076 posts

302 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Another uninteresting fat lump. Great.

Fetchez la vache

5,838 posts

234 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Sounds like it has too many compromises. Lack of dealerships as mentioned on the other Alpine thread also doesn't help.
Does anybody actually takes their EV to a track in the real world? I'm intrigued.

Bernt Tuakrisp

219 posts

220 months

Thursday
quotequote all
That F1 style steering wheel in an SUV is almost as cringingly naff as the “my first Apache” roof panel in the Grenadier.

corcoran

669 posts

294 months

Thursday
quotequote all
I enjoy journalists talking about 'the looks' like it's a new car and the Renault Rafale hasn't existed for 27 years already.

GreatScott2016

2,075 posts

108 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Hoofy said:
Another uninteresting fat lump. Great.
Sadly, I have to agree with you. I’m sure it’s fun to drive etc., etc., but new cars these days have zero appeal to me. Growing old can be a good thing after all smile

SDK

Original Poster:

2,314 posts

273 months

Thursday
quotequote all
chrisironside said:
This, the Hyundai Ioniq 5 and the Porsche Macan are rivals in the same way a squash racket, a Sky Sports subscription, and an air fryer and also rivals.
You really think?!
All are performance SUV EV's and do very similar things, at a similar price.

So nothing like your 'comparison' which are all completely different. ....unless just an attempt at being a comedian sleep

Kawasicki

13,931 posts

255 months

Thursday
quotequote all
It’s not easy to beat Porsche at steering/ride/handling. The platform has to be fundamentally set up to deliver in those areas. You can use tricks like model based torque vectoring to increase response and then dampen the resulting yaw oscillations, but it’s not easy to tune. When the tuning isn’t perfect the car won’t drive straight easily.

Don Roque

18,189 posts

179 months

Thursday
quotequote all
What a hideous blob of a car.

corcoran

669 posts

294 months

Thursday
quotequote all
SDK said:
I spent some time looking at this as a potential for my next car, at the GFOS and other online reviews

Things which I don't like:
-> The infotainment screens look outdated.
-> Only one cup holder [I know, first world problems smile ]
-> The price is very punchy.

Ultimately this is definitely a heart over head purchase.
that's 1 more cupholder than the a290! Maybe the a490 will have two.

SDK

Original Poster:

2,314 posts

273 months

Thursday
quotequote all
corcoran said:
SDK said:
I spent some time looking at this as a potential for my next car, at the GFOS and other online reviews

Things which I don't like:
-> The infotainment screens look outdated.
-> Only one cup holder [I know, first world problems smile ]
-> The price is very punchy.

Ultimately this is definitely a heart over head purchase.
that's 1 more cupholder than the a290! Maybe the a490 will have two.
smile

I 3D printed a couple of extra cupholders for my Polestar 2, which was also weak in this area.

Maxym

2,621 posts

256 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Good car driving-wise, I guess, but not for me. Alpine’s biggest problem currently is lack of dealers. For a relatively special car like the A110, you can live with that , but for an everyday drive? No.

ex-devonpaul

1,542 posts

157 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Jean Redele would turn in his grave if he saw this.

MountainsofSussex

363 posts

206 months

Thursday
quotequote all
The problem this car has is that whichever way you look it suffers from "why would you buy it over ...?" At this price, the Macan equals it on spec and destroys it on badge. The new iX3 annihilates it on range and badge. The Ioniq is much faster and you'd trust it to be more reliable. Plus, why have a car with 2 front seats and 1 cupholder?!

Demonix

739 posts

232 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Biofuel, e-fuel, hydrogen as energy sources for cars are looking more appealing by the day. Am so bored of suv shaped ev's , practical but blandly styled in the interest of range extending aerodynamics.

WhyOne

627 posts

218 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Demonix said:
Biofuel, e-fuel, hydrogen as energy sources for cars are looking more appealing by the day. Am so bored of suv shaped ev's , practical but blandly styled in the interest of range extending aerodynamics.
You really think that changing the energy source will change the manufacturer / public appetite for SUV's?

Also, whilst hydrogen can be burnt in an ICE, it is far more likely to be used in fuel-cell form....so more EV's!

MrBurt

147 posts

166 months

Thursday
quotequote all
This was on my list of potential replacement for the M3 Touring when the time comes to go electric.
It sadly looks a bit Meh, both inside and out.
Add the lack of dealers locally, the iX3 looking better on almost all the key metrics, I might skip the test drive that I promised myself, 90mile round trip to the dealer doesn’t help.
I did want to go a bit different for the next car and this caught my eye.
Plus it’s not really an SUV, the dogs will not fit in the back of that.
The final nail in the coffin is our R5 E range this time of year is really poor. Max we are getting is 150 miles on 80% charge, which is not a deal breaker for a local run about, but the main car will need to be good for 300 plus regardless of conditions and clearly manufacturers are quoting aspirational figures.
I have no intention of paying the crazy KWH charges away from home.
98Ron it will be for some time to come for the dog mover.