New Planet Ocean
Author
Discussion

Bob_Defly

Original Poster:

5,014 posts

250 months

Yesterday (18:59)
quotequote all
Slightly thinner, no He valve, more angular case, very simple case back, PCLs.

I don't like it, something seems off. The case back looks cheap, and the dial/bezel proportions look off for some reason. No date complication and still 13.7mm thick. Plus the clasp is super shiny. It just doesn't look like a tool watch anymore.







Old one for comparison:






And my Railmaster has a more interesting case back than this PO.




Thoughts?

ChocolateFrog

33,436 posts

192 months

Yesterday (19:04)
quotequote all
You've put the "old one" bit in the wrong place. Just spent 5 mins trying and failing to spot the difference hehe

Old one looks better IMO.

Bob_Defly

Original Poster:

5,014 posts

250 months

Yesterday (19:22)
quotequote all
ChocolateFrog said:
You've put the "old one" bit in the wrong place. Just spent 5 mins trying and failing to spot the difference hehe

Old one looks better IMO.
hehe sorry, formatting. I agree.

Doofus

32,162 posts

192 months

Yesterday (19:26)
quotequote all
Bezel's too thick, face is too small.

a340driver

530 posts

174 months

Yesterday (19:29)
quotequote all
You're so right this is my SeaMaster Chrono from 2011. The detail is gorgeous!


ChocolateFrog

33,436 posts

192 months

Yesterday (20:37)
quotequote all
It looks a bit like what Duplo is to Lego comparing old to new. Kind of cartoonified.

Jamescrs

5,597 posts

84 months

I think overall I prefer the new one but the lack of a He valve is missing one of the characteristics that makes the PO (and Seamaster 300) what they are which is disappointing.

I prefer the metal strap on the new versions, I like the taper but I think I prefer the rubber strap on the old PO I used to have.

Not keen on the back of the new version.

I do feel like the new ones are moving a little too closely to Rolex designs.