Box junction fine
Author
Discussion

HTP99

Original Poster:

24,375 posts

159 months

Yesterday (17:09)
quotequote all
After advice for my daughter please.

She has just received a debt collectors letter for stopping in a box junction, with a fine of £425.

The infringement was dated 14/01/2025, she had moved before that date with all correspondence going to the old address, she didn't notify the DVLA of a change of address until 11/07/2025, however has not received any correspondence regarding this infringement until today; 5m after notifying of the change of address.

She has spoken to the debt collectors who have told her she has 48 hours to pay it otherwise they can obtain an enforcement notice to seize property, she has spoke to the council who say she can appeal, detailing the circumstances and the fact she has had no correspondence to her current address until today, despite changing the details with the DVAL 5 months ago, however it can take 6 weeks for a decision.

She fully appreciates she was caught and has offered to pay the initial fine, however as it is now with the debt collectors, this is a no go.

Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated?

Durzel

12,883 posts

187 months

Yesterday (17:34)
quotequote all
I'm not sure it's relevant that she didn't receive any correspondance until she decided to update her address, as how else could they correspond with her anyway? All parties involved would have got her address from the DVLA, which had the wrong details, because they weren't informed until 6 months after the offence.

The fact she presumably updated her address completely coincidentally in July, and didn't receive the latest correspondance until November, is probably academic if the last mailing pre-July was a final demand and/or court proceedings & CCJ ruling or whatever.

This might be of help: https://www.gov.uk/appeal-against-a-penalty-charge...

E-bmw

11,659 posts

171 months

Yesterday (17:52)
quotequote all
HTP99 said:
After advice for my daughter please.

She has just received a debt collectors letter for stopping in a box junction, with a fine of £425.

The infringement was dated 14/01/2025, she had moved before that date with all correspondence going to the old address, she didn't notify the DVLA of a change of address until 11/07/2025, however has not received any correspondence regarding this infringement until today; 5m after notifying of the change of address.

She has spoken to the debt collectors who have told her she has 48 hours to pay it otherwise they can obtain an enforcement notice to seize property, she has spoke to the council who say she can appeal, detailing the circumstances and the fact she has had no correspondence to her current address until today, despite changing the details with the DVAL 5 months ago, however it can take 6 weeks for a decision.

She fully appreciates she was caught and has offered to pay the initial fine, however as it is now with the debt collectors, this is a no go.
Well, I hate to say this but from your description/timeline of events I think she has no-body else to blame & no leg to stand on.

In actual fact she is lucky that DVLA aren't going after her for not updating her address.

From DVLA website.

"You can be fined up to £1,000 if you do not tell DVLA when your address changes."

NDNDNDND

2,538 posts

202 months

Yesterday (17:55)
quotequote all
What your daughter should do is shoplift meat, deodorant , babycare and female hygiene products until she has acquired the necessary amount to pay off the bailiffs.

Because, in modern Britain, shoplifting is effectively decriminalised, whereas stopping in a box junction is treated like it's tearing apart the very fabric of society.

Sorry, I don't have any serious advice, but I'd recommend your daughter put false plates on her car, and forgo tax and insurance. The risk of being stopped for these are a fraction of the risk of being caught making a mistake and being taken to the cleaners for having the temerity to partake in society.

Never open the door to a bailiff.

Simpo Two

90,177 posts

284 months

Yesterday (18:01)
quotequote all
NDNDNDND said:
What your daughter should do is shoplift meat, deodorant , babycare and female hygiene products until she has acquired the necessary amount to pay off the bailiffs.
Vodka is a favourite in my local store; the same bloke walks out with a bottle every day with a wave at the staff.

Panamax

7,305 posts

53 months

Yesterday (18:04)
quotequote all
Very regrettably the easy way out here is to pay the £425. It'll sting a bit but then she can just get on with her life.

Panamax

7,305 posts

53 months

Yesterday (18:07)
quotequote all
NDNDNDND said:
in modern Britain, shoplifting is effectively decriminalised, whereas stopping in a box junction is treated like it's tearing apart the very fabric of society.
Ain't that the truth. The system picks on "easy targets" while turning a blind eye to anything tricky.

v9

363 posts

67 months

Yesterday (18:26)
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Vodka is a favourite in my local store; the same bloke walks out with a bottle every day with a wave at the staff.
Same here, though it s two teenage girls who steal the stuff. The shop employed a couple of scary looking blokes in big boots and stab vests, but they were told in no uncertain terms by the police that they could not do anything other than ask nicely for the items to be paid for. Anything more hands on would be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and no, we won t attend shoplifting incidents
The contract with the security company lasted less than 3 months. They turned out to be a pointless waste of money on top of the c£100 or so of vodka stolen pretty much every day.
Depressing really.

Oh, and yes, never ever open the door to a bailiff!

Durzel

12,883 posts

187 months

Yesterday (18:29)
quotequote all
How the fk is any of this overwrought, country-has-gone-to-the-dogs doom-mongering remotely helpful to the OP?

v9

363 posts

67 months

Yesterday (18:40)
quotequote all
Durzel said:
How the fk is any of this overwrought, country-has-gone-to-the-dogs doom-mongering remotely helpful to the OP?
It s just a comment on the state of policing that there seems to be an emphasis on targeting easy wins rather than dealing with more complex problems in our society. This is how forums work!
There is nothing helpful to say really other than to pay the fine and don t let the bailiff in. It s unfortunate but it s a problem of the lady s own making and not telling the DLVA is the cause.

reddiesel

2,827 posts

66 months

Yesterday (18:42)
quotequote all
Durzel said:
How the fk is any of this overwrought, country-has-gone-to-the-dogs doom-mongering remotely helpful to the OP?
It isn't . It's merely a few decent People expressing their bewilderment at what passes for priorities in this Country .
Sadly it's best to simply pay up and move on as others have said . I had a similar situation in front of Wellingborough Magistrates a few months back and the failure to inform DVLA of a change of address ontime can have serious consequences . In short its no defence .

paul_c123

1,341 posts

12 months

Yesterday (18:51)
quotequote all
£425 sounds like the sum of an original box junction fine and some amount of court fees, debt collection fees etc. Has it been to court?

v9

363 posts

67 months

Yesterday (18:53)
quotequote all
v9 said:
Durzel said:
How the fk is any of this overwrought, country-has-gone-to-the-dogs doom-mongering remotely helpful to the OP?
It s just a comment on the state of policing that there seems to be an emphasis on targeting easy wins rather than dealing with more complex problems in our society. This is how forums work!
There is nothing helpful to say really other than to pay the fine and don t let the bailiff in. It s unfortunate but it s a problem of the lady s own making and not telling the DLVA is the cause.
Sorry to quote myself and for taking this further off topic, but where have my apostrophes gone? They were there when I wrote that!

bad company

21,089 posts

285 months

Yesterday (18:54)
quotequote all
Has this been to Court? I don’t see how the bailiffs can do much without a court judgement / order.

zarjaz1991

5,010 posts

142 months

Yesterday (18:58)
quotequote all
v9 said:
Sorry to quote myself and for taking this further off topic, but where have my apostrophes gone? They were there when I wrote that!
There's a bug and the forum strips them out when they were made on a mobile phone.

Scott

zarjaz1991

5,010 posts

142 months

Yesterday (19:00)
quotequote all
In terms of the actual issue. I'm unclear what stage this is at. "Debt collectors" don't have rights to seize property.

Could we see a scan of the letter, with personal details redacted?

Scott

HTP99

Original Poster:

24,375 posts

159 months

Yesterday (19:24)
quotequote all
zarjaz1991 said:
In terms of the actual issue. I'm unclear what stage this is at. "Debt collectors" don't have rights to seize property.

Could we see a scan of the letter, with personal details redacted?

Scott


Yes she didn't inform the DVLA of a change of address untill July this year, however she has had zero correspondence at her current address until the knock on the door earlier today.

The infringment:



Edited by HTP99 on Thursday 13th November 19:28

zarjaz1991

5,010 posts

142 months

Yesterday (19:32)
quotequote all
So there's a Warrant of Control, which does allow them to seize property.

This means it's been to the County Court, presumably a judgement in default and now the council has applied for the warrant.

As others have said the best way out of this is going to be to pay it. Your daughter could try to get the judgement set aside but this exposes the fact she didn't update her address and so could make things worse. Plus setting it aside doesn't make it go away, just sets the process back a few steps.

The moral here is always, definitely keep addresses up to date. That way you always know if something nasty is happening behind your back. This minor issue could have been settled for a fraction of what it's now costing.

Don't delay on the payment if that's the chosen course of action. If they do send actual bailiffs to seize property, costs will get added on at stupid levels.

Scott

Pica-Pica

15,619 posts

103 months

Yesterday (19:38)
quotequote all
Panamax said:
Ain't that the truth. The system picks on "easy targets" while turning a blind eye to anything tricky.
Everybody picks on easy targets, even we all on here, it's human nature and financial sense to do just that.

mac96

5,409 posts

162 months

Yesterday (19:49)
quotequote all
Pica-Pica said:
Panamax said:
Ain't that the truth. The system picks on "easy targets" while turning a blind eye to anything tricky.
Everybody picks on easy targets, even we all on here, it's human nature and financial sense to do just that.
True at every stage. Even the original 'offence' was ridiculous. A few inches over the line. Not obstructing anyone. No justification for a fine. It's a cliché but it shows the whole problem with camera enforcement, no room for common sense .