New Renault Clio
Author
Discussion

119

Original Poster:

15,059 posts

55 months

Yesterday (16:58)
quotequote all
This just caught my attention, and i must say, what a transformation!

New designer maybe?


wevster

873 posts

176 months

Yesterday (16:59)
quotequote all
119 said:
This just caught my attention, and i must say, what a transformation!

New designer maybe?

That looks awful, looks more dated that the current version.

Alex_225

7,128 posts

220 months

Yesterday (17:05)
quotequote all
Looks very much like every other half SUV, half hatchback out there. Much prefer the new Twingo or R5, they seem to have nailed an interesting design.

T1547

1,200 posts

153 months

Yesterday (17:18)
quotequote all
Looks smart to me, can see the Clio ‘dna’ but modern and up to date.

andrewpandrew

1,317 posts

8 months

Yesterday (17:18)
quotequote all
wevster said:
119 said:
This just caught my attention, and i must say, what a transformation!

New designer maybe?

That looks awful, looks more dated that the current version.
Agreed, looks terrible.

119

Original Poster:

15,059 posts

55 months

Yesterday (17:22)
quotequote all
Yeah i can see why some might not like it, but it was more about the complete redesign.

Having said that, i think it was well overdue.

Not sure on the boxy flat front end though but like with everything, may be different in the flesh.

Heathwood

2,898 posts

221 months

Yesterday (17:33)
quotequote all
That’s really rather odd looking. The front looks like 2 designs melded together at the mid point and seems to accentuate rather than the disguise the height of the bonnet.

Vsix and Vtec

1,133 posts

37 months

Yesterday (17:33)
quotequote all
Looks more Mazda than Renault. After playing a blinder with the new 4, 5 and Twingo, this is a real let down

Jimbo.

4,140 posts

208 months

Yesterday (17:34)
quotequote all
When you look at the R5 and R4 and just how well designed they are, you get the impression the Clio team just phoned it in.

MattsCar

1,904 posts

124 months

Yesterday (19:03)
quotequote all
Can't understand how this fits in their line up, surely if you want a supermini you go for the Renault 4 or 5?

An entire new car just to make a hybrid drivetrain available as an option for those that want it?

On a side note I am trying to think of any other manufacturer who has sold 2 superminis of similar proportions, at the same time and can't.


dci

634 posts

160 months

Yesterday (19:19)
quotequote all
MattsCar said:
On a side note I am trying to think of any other manufacturer who has sold 2 superminis of similar proportions, at the same time and can't.
VAG will sell you the same car with 4 different badges on the front a la A3, Golf, Fabia or Leon. All the same underpinnings with differing trim levels and price points.

PSA with the Corsa, 208 or C3.

Its quite common.

MattsCar

1,904 posts

124 months

Yesterday (20:02)
quotequote all
Sorry, I should have said brand, not manufacturer.

Jimbo.

4,140 posts

208 months

Yesterday (20:03)
quotequote all
MattsCar said:
Can't understand how this fits in their line up, surely if you want a supermini you go for the Renault 4 or 5?

An entire new car just to make a hybrid drivetrain available as an option for those that want it?

On a side note I am trying to think of any other manufacturer who has sold 2 superminis of similar proportions, at the same time and can't.
Ford with the Fiesta and the Ka+?

I believe Fords thinking was folk who’d normally go for a cheap(er)-spec Fiesta, would instead opt for the 5dr, similar-ish sized Ka+. When in reality it was a much cheaper car for Ford to produce, hence a little more profit.

mike13

745 posts

201 months

Yesterday (20:03)
quotequote all
Looks like an mg3, totally spoiled a great car!

Dog Biscuit

1,215 posts

16 months

Yesterday (20:05)
quotequote all
Looks wk

MattsCar

1,904 posts

124 months

Jimbo. said:
Ford with the Fiesta and the Ka+?

I believe Fords thinking was folk who d normally go for a cheap(er)-spec Fiesta, would instead opt for the 5dr, similar-ish sized Ka+. When in reality it was a much cheaper car for Ford to produce, hence a little more profit.
Yep, that is one, even sharing the same chassis.

5s Alive

2,531 posts

53 months

Cross between a Puma and Mazda 2. Can't think of a car that's successfully adopted the gaping maw look.