RE: Hold the phone: a Montego 2.0 LXi is for sale
RE: Hold the phone: a Montego 2.0 LXi is for sale
Yesterday

Hold the phone: a Montego 2.0 LXi is for sale

One of the last ever made, and with just 2,000 miles on it as well. Find another...


It’s sad to think of so many old cars having to be considered as ‘survivors’ these days. Not so long ago (or so it seems, at least), cars that weren’t hugely old nor hugely prestigious were commonplace on our roads, offering up some variety. But attitudes to car consumption have changed, with newer models dominating and folk less inclined to get things fixed when replacing is easier than ever. And with repair costs now being what they are.

Cars may have been simpler to fix once upon a time, but they were also prone to going wrong more often. One of the great miracles of modern motoring is actually how often cars do work, when they’re comprised of so many bits. And this all relates to this glorious Montego because everything about its history suggests that, really, none should be left at all. Yet here we have one of the very last ones made, complete with just 2,100 miles and one owner from new. Yes, seriously. 

As far back as 2006, Auto Express reckoned that the Montego was the eighth-most scrapped car of the last 30 years - just 8,988 of the 436,000 produced were still going even then. They rusted, early ones couldn’t run on unleaded fuel, they must have been banger raced, they weren’t worth much and so on. Then just think what the past two decades have been like for sending cars off to the scrapper, whether Government-incentivised or not. There was no real reason to keep a Montego, really, and now there are less than a hundred. 

This one isn’t in time warp condition so much as time capsule condition. It’s an utterly wonderful throwback to British Leyland and Rover Group, with trims and fonts and fabrics that will be so familiar to so many, all perfectly preserved. It’s all still a bit naff, sure, but it’s retro naff, and that’s fun. The advert states that this one has been with an enthusiast since 1993, a person so dedicated to Montegos that this one is saved for best and the miles are put on another one. Talk about commitment to the cause. 

Despite minimal use, maintenance is said to have been regular; it’s been sparingly driven, but driven nonetheless, rather than being parked up for 30 years. Presumably, given the effort that’s been invested in getting it this far, the Montego should be on the button and ready to rock. Certainly the engine bay, like the rest of it, is pristine, almost with enough space for another 2.0 EFi to squeeze in. 

What a Montego LXi in unrepeatable conditions might now be worth isn’t clear - the ad is POA. When we last wrote about one of these, it was an earlier 1.6 L estate with a little over 30,000 miles; that was for sale at £8,000, so you’d have to assume more for this one. It’s hardly like numbers will have increased in the past couple of years, and the enthusiasm from Montego fans won't have faded one bit. Without doubt it’s going to be fawned over wherever it ends up; because there are classic car survivors, you see, and then there’s the Montego. 


See original ad

Author
Discussion

Flanners

Original Poster:

239 posts

149 months

Yesterday (07:01)
quotequote all
My old man had one back in the day....was a step up in looks from his previous Datsun Sunny. A good practical family car but think the tin worm eventually took it. Chap up the road to us had a black MG Montego Turbo. now that was a car I lusted after.....

GTEYE

2,311 posts

229 months

Yesterday (07:19)
quotequote all
POA on a Montego? Oh come on.

Interesting that it’s survived, but that’s about it.

Alorotom

12,606 posts

206 months

Yesterday (07:24)
quotequote all
“Find another”, no thanks, I’d rather not have known about this one.

Montegos had zero redeeming features and certainly aren’t worth cherishing.

Gary C

14,237 posts

198 months

Yesterday (07:25)
quotequote all
It would be a giggle to thrash it about as an unusual daily, but its more of a £500 shed style car which doesn't match its condition.

Really a museum piece now, something interesting to see and remember rather.

soad

34,140 posts

195 months

Yesterday (07:30)
quotequote all
All stock is POA, even on their website.

Not sure why made me think of a Nissan Bluebird? confused

ducnick

2,103 posts

262 months

Yesterday (07:45)
quotequote all
Laugh all you want, but with the introduction of pay per mile electronic surveillance and checking the odometer at each mot, this could be a very cheap to run ‘new’ car. Remove the Speedo cable and use your phone for speed / navigation, and it’s peanuts to run.

MDMA .

9,859 posts

120 months

Yesterday (07:46)
quotequote all
soad said:
All stock is POA, even on their website.
Renowned for it. It’s so they can charge on how gullible you are if you make contact about anything.

cobra kid

5,447 posts

259 months

Yesterday (07:47)
quotequote all
ducnick said:
Laugh all you want, but with the introduction of pay per mile electronic surveillance and checking the odometer at each mot, this could be a very cheap to run new car. Remove the Speedo cable and use your phone for speed / navigation, and it s peanuts to run.
Are service items and parts in ready supply for lumps like this?

cerb4.5lee

39,540 posts

199 months

Yesterday (07:50)
quotequote all
Funnily enough I only saw a Montego Estate the other day, and I said to my missus what a lovely throwback it was. I used to work with a chap who had one years back as well. Good memories for sure for me.

evojam

728 posts

179 months

Yesterday (07:52)
quotequote all
Good cars back in the day,light airy and spacious and pretty decent to drive,estate would be my preference.

CarlosSainz100

660 posts

139 months

Yesterday (07:53)
quotequote all
I look forward to the Harrys Garage review.....

Brinyan

470 posts

112 months

Yesterday (07:55)
quotequote all
Handbrake turn

M138

814 posts

10 months

Yesterday (08:01)
quotequote all
Alorotom said:
Find another , no thanks, I d rather not have known about this one.

Montegos had zero redeeming features and certainly aren t worth cherishing.
Relatively speaking they were not bad cars in that era.
I had a couple of 1.6 versions and had the unfortunate experience of a timing belt snapping on one of them. No valves meeting pistons, timing marks on pulleys made this an easy job to change, up and running within an hour.
I had a similar era VW Golf, built robust but not reliable at all.
All were bought s/h I hasten to add.

MCBrowncoat

1,408 posts

165 months

Yesterday (08:06)
quotequote all
CarlosSainz100 said:
I look forward to the Harrys Garage review.....
I thought he was doing less reviews from Hairpin these days and switched to [checks notes] Metcalfe Cars...?

SDK

2,194 posts

272 months

Yesterday (08:11)
quotequote all
Awesome to see one of these still in showroom condition smile

I spent many hour as a child in the back of one of these, travelling 400 miles round trip to Devon and back.

DaveCWK

2,238 posts

193 months

Yesterday (08:11)
quotequote all
What is the point in POA.

Motormouth88

661 posts

79 months

Yesterday (08:13)
quotequote all
The most outrageous POA in history…so dumb

limpsfield

6,399 posts

272 months

Yesterday (08:14)
quotequote all
I had a couple of these back in the 90s as company cars' "Beige" would be my memory of them, although I think there were some who thought they were classier than the Cavalier/Sierra equivalents.

Bland then, and could not see the appeal now.

And, as mentioned above, POA seems ridiculous most of the time and particulary here.

Water Fairy

6,281 posts

174 months

Yesterday (08:18)
quotequote all
Nice to see in such great nick but one for the Festival of the Unexceptional methinks

J4CKO

45,075 posts

219 months

Yesterday (08:19)
quotequote all
Alorotom said:
Find another , no thanks, I d rather not have known about this one.

Montegos had zero redeeming features and certainly aren t worth cherishing.
They had,

Decent performance for the engine size.
Good Visibility
Good Handling
Comfortable ride
Reasonable economy
Were Fairly Spacious
A large boot
Drove well

Same old boring comments "Zero reeedming features", they sold in large numbers. The Sierra and Cavalier were the main competitors, drove them all in period, Montego 1.6 vs a Sierra 1.6, the Montego was quite a bit quicker and handled better, base Sierras were right wobbly things saddled with a 73 BHP boat anchor pinto.

Montegos werent perfect, they did like to rust (but then so did everything else), they got nicked a lot (so did everything else) and they werent the most reliable.

I had one very similar to this, got me all over for a few years, it was cheap but it made the Manta GTE I had before feel old and ponderous which was a surprise.

They werent the best car ever, no but "not worth cherishing", they were a big part of peoples lives and the motoring landscape for better or worse, weird to just decide none are worth keeping as you dont aspire to them, I dont want another one but so glad other folk do and take them to shows, nice to have a nosey at one after 30 plus years.