RE: Jaguar I-Pace | PH Fleet
RE: Jaguar I-Pace | PH Fleet
Yesterday

Jaguar I-Pace | PH Fleet

Three thousand miles in, life with an I-Pace couldn't be better - no, really 


You know when your new car is a good’n, I think, when you aren’t thinking about the old car very much. It must be a decent upgrade, because there isn’t any longing for what’s been given up. When my Mini blew a head gasket and I tried to be sensible replacing it with a Mazda 3, there wasn’t a journey that went by without yearning for my old car back. But the opposite is true for our family Jaguar I-Pace; it replaced an X3 M40i, which itself was a great car, and yet I haven’t found myself pining for the Beemer’s charms very much at all. Sometimes I see one going the other way, and it’s a nice reminder of a really good BMW, though I’m not desperate to switch seats. 

Which is a long way of saying our Jaguar I-Pace is brilliant. I’m almost at the point of wishing we’d changed sooner, however compelling the X3’s blend of straight six sound and 400 miles to a (pricey) fill was. Put simply, the Jag is doing everything and more that we hoped it would; as well as being more enjoyable on the shorter trips that dominate life with a young family (nursery, swimming pools, farms) thanks to its cushier ride and EV response, it’s proving likeable on a whole host of journeys. 

There’s ample space for everyone and everything we ever need to take anywhere; a rear middle seat is more usable than the X3’s without a transmission tunnel robbing foot room. It’s always fast, regardless of what’s been lobbed in the back. And when travelling alone, Jaguar’s expert tuning of suspension, steering and brakes makes the I-Pace really satisfying to drive. Adjusting the regen is buried in a slightly fiddly menu, but we’ve found the strongest setting really easy to adapt to. The flow and finesse that characterises a Jaguar driving experience is most certainly in evidence here. Which was well known from all the glowing I-Pace reviews, of course, but it’s nice to be reminded of the fact. As a driving experience, it isn’t disgraced by newer electric rivals. 

Indeed there are certain things the Jag still does better than the current crop. I love the interior, with chunky buttons for the transmission (useful for three-point turns when lost) as well as the drive modes  (useful when eking out a few more miles) and those F-Type-style knurled dials for the ventilation. Naturally, there’s greater familiarity with your own car than a press demonstrator, but bear in mind that this basic layout went on sale in 2018 and I think it’s ageing really well. Particularly with the Pivi Pro update that still works so smartly. 

Gripes are few and far between. At this time of year, a rear wiper would be handy; I can’t believe that any drag advantage outweighs the usefulness of clearing the back screen properly. The grimier weather has found the tyres wanting a couple of times, too, so replacing those might be in order soon. And black over cream is proving tricky to keep clean, but that feels like telling you an I-Pace needs plugging in to charge. Of course it’s hard work. When spick and span, I think the Jag looks fantastic. 

Speaking of charging, there are no disasters to report. Yet. One will surely follow soon, because that’s life in the UK with an EV. Most of our charging is done at home (the Easee One we have comes highly recommended, it’s so easy to schedule even I can do it), and the I-Pace has hooked up to public chargers slow, fast and rapid no problem at all. When conditions have been ideal (nobody else on the charger, battery well above 10 per cent and warm enough), it’s achieved close to its maximum 100kW DC charge rate, too. 

It would be nice if the Jag went a bit further and charged a bit faster, even if that feels like the dream of every EV owner. At the moment, we’re averaging around 3mi/kWh, which in theory would give 270 miles from the 90kWh battery. It goes above that around town, then a little less when cruising at a constant speed. Typically I reckon we’re charging every 230 miles or so, which is absolutely fine. The bigger issue, as is all too well known at the moment, is the cost of public charging, which shows absolutely no signs of easing off. At some of the priciest, you’re paying almost 90p per kilowatt hour, so effectively close to 30p a mile in ‘fuel’ at the 3mi/kWh average. And that’s just crazy, further disincentivising people to make the EV swap. 

Then, of course, there’s winter to think about. Despite a mild November for us so far, the colder weeks will be coming, and that’ll be the real test of the I-Pace’s mettle. Will it still be as likeable with reduced range? Let’s check back around Christmas time…


FACT SHEET 

Car: 2021 Jaguar I-Pace HSE
Run by: Matt Bird
On fleet since: August 2025
Bought for: £21,700
Mileage: 41,687
Last month at a glance: Grace, space, pace - it’s a Jag alright

Previous reports

To EV or not to EV - now the question’s answered

Author
Discussion

B10

Original Poster:

1,351 posts

286 months

Yesterday (12:37)
quotequote all
A great car that Jag never really built upon.

BikeSausage

612 posts

87 months

Yesterday (12:48)
quotequote all
These still look good whenever I see them on the road. They also work very well as a robotaxi too.

theicemario

1,375 posts

94 months

Yesterday (12:56)
quotequote all
Like these a lot.

An absolute tragedy how poorly they sold, especially when compared against the Model Y. Which is nowhere near as nice.

Edited by theicemario on Wednesday 12th November 09:01

J4k43

33 posts

Yesterday (13:02)
quotequote all
I think it was a huge mistake that Jaguar did not do a version 2 refresh with slighly better range and charge rate which would still be selling well even today.

I dislike SUVs so it's probably not for me but I'm still sorely tempted. Where I live the range is equivalent to 4 hours driving that's enough for me before I need a break.

hu8742

324 posts

144 months

Yesterday (13:15)
quotequote all
Small (ish) EV = perfect city car and every day commuter. Bonus if you can use it for more. Puzzles me why car manufacturers persist on going down the road of massive SUVs and barges in EV form. Leave those units for ICE and make more affordable small EVs for the shorter, every day stuff.

EV8

376 posts

22 months

Yesterday (13:20)
quotequote all
I think the only downside of it is slow DC charging. This makes a lot of difference on long trips.

Twoshoe

954 posts

203 months

Yesterday (13:24)
quotequote all
J4k43 said:
I think it was a huge mistake that Jaguar did not do a version 2 refresh with slighly better range and charge rate which would still be selling well even today.

I dislike SUVs so it's probably not for me but I'm still sorely tempted. Where I live the range is equivalent to 4 hours driving that's enough for me before I need a break.
Still a handsome thing after all these years.

I don't like SUVs either, but this is certainly less er... SUV-y than many out there, and I would consider one if it suited my needs. Are they as unreliable as people say though?

EV8

376 posts

22 months

Yesterday (13:25)
quotequote all
hu8742 said:
Small (ish) EV = perfect city car and every day commuter. Bonus if you can use it for more. Puzzles me why car manufacturers persist on going down the road of massive SUVs and barges in EV form. Leave those units for ICE and make more affordable small EVs for the shorter, every day stuff.
Past are the days, that EVs were only for short trips/commute. People want EVs just the same as petrol/diesels. All shapes and sizes. And I personally sure do not want massive petrol bills for a big-ish performance SUV, if I can have one that I drive basically for fee (solar surplus). And it was cheaper to buy too.

J4k43

33 posts

Yesterday (13:30)
quotequote all
Twoshoe said:
Still a handsome thing after all these years.

I don't like SUVs either, but this is certainly less er... SUV-y than many out there, and I would consider one if it suited my needs. Are they as unreliable as people say though?
I'm not too sure about reliability but one would hope with a used buy the likelihood is than faults have been rectified.

I'm still tempted to get a late model one which i'd keep for 5 years or so. I'd be buying spring/summer 2026. The issue I have is that my current EV fulfils my needs but I still have that itch.

S600BSB

6,912 posts

125 months

Yesterday (13:38)
quotequote all
Had one on a 3 year lease. Fabulous car - never missed a beat. Jaguar should have continued to develop the iPace.

Rob-s5mok

128 posts

119 months

Yesterday (13:40)
quotequote all
Great car, I had one for nearly 4 years and loved it. The Achilles heel (of the earlier ones at least) is the two 12v battery set up, these don't last and when they go bad, it's a hassle to get out right, especially at main dealer rates

Downward

4,965 posts

122 months

Yesterday (13:41)
quotequote all
Was tempted to buy but bottled it. 2 years later hmmm ..

£15k for a 5 year old one though. Tempting

SDK

2,185 posts

272 months

Yesterday (14:31)
quotequote all
Wait, what ....?!
No fireballs, no battery failures, no major loss of range.

beer


SpeckledJim

31,696 posts

272 months

Yesterday (14:38)
quotequote all
hu8742 said:
Small (ish) EV = perfect city car and every day commuter. Bonus if you can use it for more. Puzzles me why car manufacturers persist on going down the road of massive SUVs and barges in EV form. Leave those units for ICE and make more affordable small EVs for the shorter, every day stuff.
Because the early adopters of EVs are/were relatively well-off, can access company car schemes and often are company owners with major tax benefits from buying an EV, and generally have somewhere to charge it overnight.

They're coming from large ICE Audis, BMWs, Mercedes, Range Rovers. You're not going to get them out of an £60k ICE and into a £20k EV supermini.

That part of the transition comes later.

uktrailmonster

7,894 posts

219 months

Yesterday (14:54)
quotequote all
theicemario said:
Like these a lot.

An absolutely tragedy how poorly they sold, especially when compared against the Model Y. Which is nowhere near as nice.
They were a lot more expensive than a Model Y and didn’t have access to Tesla Superchargers back then. Also a bit short on range and charging speed.

But today they look like an absolute bargain if you put on your brave pants regarding dealer support and reliability.

DonkeyApple

64,911 posts

188 months

Yesterday (15:01)
quotequote all
hu8742 said:
Small (ish) EV = perfect city car and every day commuter. Bonus if you can use it for more. Puzzles me why car manufacturers persist on going down the road of massive SUVs and barges in EV form. Leave those units for ICE and make more affordable small EVs for the shorter, every day stuff.
That's just a legacy of low volume production costs. No one was ever going to buy £50k shopping trolleys but they would buy £100k barges.

Ten years on we can clearly see the European manufacturers are beginning to catch up re production costs and volumes so we are starting to see smaller and lower cost EVs. Ergo the sub £20k Twingo etc.

Give it another ten years and there'll be an array of dirt cheap, small, used EVs knocking about.

MarkT17

244 posts

208 months

Yesterday (15:13)
quotequote all
Bar a windscreen debond, ours has been great, it drives great, goes like a rocket, a range that I personally have no issue with (also the charging speed, as 95% of mine is at home or work) - and considering the price you can get them for now, a veritable bargain (I thought that 2 years ago paying £14k more than it's now worth lol). Wider than you think and turning circle is suitably crap, but you can't have everything.

Only real downside with them in general is that some seem to be just one thing after another in terms of issues, but if you get a good one, they're REALLY good.

Fantomas

68 posts

66 months

Yesterday (15:17)
quotequote all
Never really liked the look. No real Jaguar DNA, it could be a Kia or Volvo. Thought it looked like a hatchback enlarged 125% !
I remember being surprised by their size when I first saw one years ago, much bigger than their look would suggest.
Anyhow, I’m sure it’s a fine car based on the positive reviews.

RiccardoG

1,723 posts

291 months

Yesterday (15:20)
quotequote all

I genuinely don't see how people see this as a handsome car. I find its one of the ugliest and least cohesive designs on the road. Every time I see one it looks to me like 3 different cars welded together. I find them almost offensive to look at, even if it were a Chinese brand - never mind a Jaguar with a back catalogue of XJs, E-Types, XKs, etc.

Still, its interesting to note I may be in the minority based on the above comments of how great this "thing" looks. I'm sure there are lots of good points with this car, as stated in the article, even compared to a X3 6 cylinder petrol. But I never thought the aesthetics would be one of them!

Either way, good reading and thanks for sharing Matt, I'll look upon these ugly ducklings with a bit more reverence now.

garypotter

1,974 posts

169 months

Yesterday (15:21)
quotequote all
Fantomas said:
Never really liked the look. No real Jaguar DNA, it could be a Kia or Volvo. Thought it looked like a hatchback enlarged 125% !
I remember being surprised by their size when I first saw one years ago, much bigger than their look would suggest.
Anyhow, I m sure it s a fine car based on the positive reviews.
Agree many a positive review but for me - Never, very ugly and a jaguar badged car so Jaguar repair costs