MG RV8?
Author
Discussion

Doofus

Original Poster:

31,793 posts

191 months

I've been offered one for a decent price.

High miles, but recent partial restoration.

MGBs have never floated my boat, so I've largely ignored the RV8.

Any experience or opinion?

M138

743 posts

9 months

I think they look lovely.
Liked them when they first came out, then wasn’t so keen but back to really liking them, aged very well. Plenty enough power on our cr*ppy roads and being British and a MG no shortage of parts I would imagine.

RichB

54,453 posts

302 months

When I was younger my brother and I were MG chaps through and through. I had a ZA followed by 2 x MGA 1600s and a Twin Cam followed by a CGT while he had a Midget, a 1600 MGA and an MGB. I toyed with a Costello BV8 but by the time the RV8 came out MGs were done. The TVR Chimaera had the same Rover V8 and was a much more modern design and reading the contemporary road tests a better car all round. Whereas the TVR is timeless, the RV8 always seemed like a bit of a lump to me.

Doofus

Original Poster:

31,793 posts

191 months

RichB said:
...the RV8 always seemed like a bit of a lump to me.
That's kind of how I've seen it too. I think I'm only considering it because it's been offered to me. I would never have gone looking for one.

I might have a go in it next week...

9xxNick

1,092 posts

232 months

I have no experience of these, but it's got to be worth a test drive. While it's probably not sports car, it might be a very agreeable V8 woofler for summer outings and if the price is right...

Hoofy

78,896 posts

300 months

Rare enough to be interesting. If the money's right and I had space, I'd take a punt.

awooga

442 posts

152 months

Saturday
quotequote all
I was given one to run around in while my normal MG B was being given some welding attention.

Ride was a bit choppy, but the noise was awesome. More refined than you'd think, certainly less raw than the Chimaera i owned a few years later. Not stupidly quick but very pleasantly so.

The gearbox intrudes a lot more into the cockpit than a normal B, so it felt a little more cramped. The interior is all 90s rouched leather and magnolia dials and you still have to wind the windows down yourself (the MGOC will sell you a cheap electric conversion). The hood has blind spots in the rear quarters, which the normal B doesn't have. The front suspension and brake set up is pretty decent, not snatchy but will take some getting used to if you're from a very modern car. Rear suspension is on parabolic springs and they're actually pretty decent. I didn't drive it hard enough to see if it suffered from axle tramp and I can't remember if it had a LSD or not - again, I didn't drive it hard enough to find out!

Reasonable size boot if you take the spare wheel out and replace it with a can of tyre foam

Having owned a chimaera and all the faults that went with it, an RV8 may well have been a better purchase for me. Ah well, too late now! The chimaera was a lot quicker and the steering ridiculously quick but the RV8 may have been easier to live with.

Doofus

Original Poster:

31,793 posts

191 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Thank you.

I don't really have a need for it, so if it's not world-shattering, I'll probably pass.

vixen1700

26,683 posts

288 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Never been that keen on the looks really, rather have a Chimaera (although I've lost interest in mine) or a Griffith from the same period.

Or a chrome-bumper BGT V8. smile

Mr Tidy

27,758 posts

145 months

Saturday
quotequote all
I don't seem to remember them getting very much praise in reviews back in the day. IIRC they had the same ride height as the rubber bumper cars which did nothing for the handling.

Great engine though and probably pretty reliable with good spares availability but probably more of a wafter than a sports car.

reddiesel

2,808 posts

65 months

Yesterday (09:44)
quotequote all
Rightly or wrongly , in Period I always saw them as part of that Revival Phase that saw a few manufacturers reimagine their "greatest hits ". Volkswagen probably kicked it off with the Beetle , Jaguar with the S Type , Fiat with the 500 etc etc . I don't recall the Media heralding the RV8 as a Nurburgring Lapping flying machine and unlike the TR Triumphs it didn't earn us a fortune in Exports either . That said however , I think history has been kind to the Model and bought at the right money I think it's a very capable GT with a lovely engine . Get it on the ramp , do a bit of research and then more importantly your Maths .

reddiesel

2,808 posts

65 months

Yesterday (10:04)
quotequote all
https://angliacarauctions.co.uk/auctions/2728-01-N...

One coming up for Auction early next month , appears to be a Japanese Car

Doofus

Original Poster:

31,793 posts

191 months

Yesterday (10:05)
quotequote all
reddiesel said:
https://angliacarauctions.co.uk/auctions/2728-01-N...

One coming up for Auction early next month , appears to be a Japanese Car
The vast majorty of them were sold to Japan

reddiesel

2,808 posts

65 months

Yesterday (10:23)
quotequote all
Its a real pity about its insurance classification .

Wheel Turned Out

1,725 posts

56 months

Yesterday (10:31)
quotequote all
I quite like them though they've always been too cramped for me, but I'm not sure there's much about them to appeal to you if it's only on your radar because you've been offered it. They don't seem to do anything exceptionally well.

An old car even when it was brand new.

Mr Squarekins

1,381 posts

80 months

Yesterday (14:39)
quotequote all
There was a blue one at Shelsley Walsh this morning. I'd forgotten just how tiny they seem now. Quite nice looking thing though.

Not sure why I know, but I recall the front wings are expensive, a grand or more each for some reason.

RichB

54,453 posts

302 months

Yesterday (15:09)
quotequote all
reddiesel said:
Its a real pity about its insurance classification .
In what respect? confused

awooga

442 posts

152 months

Yesterday (17:35)
quotequote all
Mr Tidy said:
I don't seem to remember them getting very much praise in reviews back in the day. IIRC they had the same ride height as the rubber bumper cars which did nothing for the handling.

Great engine though and probably pretty reliable with good spares availability but probably more of a wafter than a sports car.
They had a completely different suspension set up to any of the Bs. Front cross member had coilovers, gas shocks, vented disks etc. Rear suspension was bespoke parabolics with some sort of gas shocks. It was certainly nothing like the rolly polly stilt set up on a mid 70s rubber bumper car.

You're right in that it's a wafter though!

FlyVintage

223 posts

9 months

Yesterday (17:59)
quotequote all
RichB said:
reddiesel said:
Its a real pity about its insurance classification .
In what respect? confused
Insurance writeoff

Dashnine

1,621 posts

68 months

Yesterday (17:59)
quotequote all
Doofus said:
reddiesel said:
https://angliacarauctions.co.uk/auctions/2728-01-N...

One coming up for Auction early next month , appears to be a Japanese Car
The vast majorty of them were sold to Japan
And a lot are, or have been coming back. Advantage other than the condition is that Japanese spec cars had AC as standard, and can be spotted externally by (unless removed) a Rover badge on lower front wing.

Edited by Dashnine on Sunday 12th October 18:03