RE: Audi A4 Cabriolet V6 | Shed of the Week
RE: Audi A4 Cabriolet V6 | Shed of the Week
Today

Audi A4 Cabriolet V6 | Shed of the Week

British Summer Time is almost done - how about a 250hp Audi drop-top to make the most of it?


Another Shed debutant this week (sort of) in the lustrous shape of this B7 Audi A4 Cabriolet with a big motor under the lid. We say 'sort of' because we did have a 3.0 TDi one of these a year or so ago, but this is the first 3.1 petrol Cab to appear here. 

It’s an all-wheel drive manual one, too. Quattro-ness added 35kg to the weight of the two-wheel-drive petrol version, taking it to 1,695kg, and 32g/km to the CO2 emissions number taking that to a kofftastic 262g/km and a bell-ringing UK vehicle duty bill of £760pa. That, plus the urban fuel consumption figure of 17mpg, is presumably why this car has been sat around unsold in PH classifieds for the last few weeks. It’s the Akita in the dog pound. You can have it for next to nothing – £1,995 or less if you’re good at negotiating – but do you want to foot the costs of running it? 

You might want to when you find out some of the other stats. The naturally aspirated 60-degree V6 ‘AUK’ engine, part of the EA837 family, displaced 3,123cc. If anybody knows why Audi put a ‘3.2’ badge on it, well, just keep that to yourself, eh? It made 252hp at 6,500rpm and 243lb ft at 3,250rpm. In manual guise. that made it good for a 0-62mph time of 6.8 seconds (the ZF 6HP Tiptronic version that was an option on quattro models was quite a bit slower at 7.4 seconds) and a presumably limited top speed of 155mph. Unlike Bob the Binman on a Friday night, it was smooth and refined. Also, unlike Bob, it looked great, once you’d got yourself over the B7’s new grille anyway. That did cause some consternation at first, but like BMW’s new grille it turned out to be a grower.

As Shed has discovered on more than one occasion, there’s a downside to everything, and in this case, although the 3.1 V6 was generally pretty reliable, it did suffer from the usual VAG ailments like short-lived coil packs, wonky water pumps and titsy timing chain tensioners. It was direct injection too and therefore prone to carbon buildup in the intake valvegear. Top end oil leaks weren’t unknown either. The hood clearly works on this one, which is a bonus. Other Cabriolet-specific issues included water ingress in heavy rain via poorly-sealed windscreens. Water could also get into the systems for the airbag light, seat belt warning, interior lighting and windows, as well as ECUs. Generically, A4 central locking systems flaked out, as did HVAC blower motors. Cabin rattles could become the bane of your life. 

All that said, this car does have a certain air about it. It sits well, the shutlines appear crisp and the hood fabric looks like it’s got some life left in it yet. If you asked a pedestrian to guess its mileage, they’d probably say something quite a way under the 135,000 it’s actually done. The vendors have put the registration plate OV07 OGA in the boot, a trick Shed is thinking of trying next time he fancies a razz past the safety camera van that sits just before the no limit sign on the edge of town. That number unlocks the Audi’s MOT history, which looks very nice with nothing but consumables mentioned on the advisories and a clean ticket issued at the last test in June. 

Apart from a saggy net on the back of the passenger seat and some sticky-looking buttons here and there, the cabin appears to be standing up nicely. There’s some extra wear at the 4pm mark on the steering wheel, possibly indicating a fair bit of one-handed, elbow on sill style boulevardier driving. What the left hand might have been doing is anybody’s guess. Shed made a guess based on the postmistress being at the wheel but we’re not allowed to print that. All we can say is that the gearknob has gone the same colour as the wheel, suggesting that one of the previous owners might have been a gardener, a builder, or a high-rollin’ hashish user. 


Here’s the ad

Author
Discussion

el romeral

Original Poster:

1,748 posts

155 months

Looks good - smooth, suave and sophisticated. Great car if you do not mind the higher running costs.

waynedear

2,342 posts

185 months

5 minutes of ' yes, yes,yes'... Then duck that for a game of soldiers for the tax.

Demonix

708 posts

230 months

The bodywork, especially the rear bumper has more scuffs than a 6 year old's school shoes, looks like it has parking sensors but suspect they aren't working or last owner was deaf? Given age and mileage the borkage potential is strong with this one but at £1600 it may last a year or two before emptying your wallet.

WPA

12,465 posts

132 months

No thanks, £760 RFL make zero sense on a shed money car.

dralig

22 posts

17 months

Hang the expense. Give the interior a bit of a scrub and the exterior a tub of Color Magic, and that will look very nice indeed. Wafting around with the top down in the sleet - what more do you want?

Hub

6,814 posts

216 months

These A4 cabrios are disappearing now, I always thought they looked quite smart but probably didn't drive fantastically. I didn't know the 3.2 was a 3.1, probably still sounds good though. I'd take a punt but ditch the cheap looking aftermarket wheels.

119

14,394 posts

54 months

What colour is that interior supposed to be?

Kinda looks greyeige.

Gad-Westy

15,925 posts

231 months

I’m not about to buy one or anything but Audi made some really beautifully proportioned, handsome cars back then.

bennytheball

188 posts

45 months

WPA said:
No thanks, £760 RFL make zero sense on a shed money car.
This is shed of the week, not bangernomics. The priority is to find something interesting for under £2k, not to find something that's cheap to run.

If this does 12,000 miles per year, it's going to cost £240 a month to fuel it, plus quite a bit on maintenance, so a few quid extra a month on RFL, whilst irritating, should hardly be a deal breaker.

Besides, if the RFL was £30 a year, it would be on sale for rather more than £2k...


Edited by bennytheball on Friday 10th October 07:37

FrankandLynn

36 posts

11 months

Best time of year to get into this and then punt it out next summer for a grand more, or simply keep and use as a sunny day boulevardier. Yes, the tax is a crunch-point but, as others have said, it’s the cost of a shed rather than bangernomics.

PSB1967

381 posts

174 months

I test drove an Avant Quattro with this engine in Bristol. I reset the mpg meter, set off for a 20 mile drive and on return checked said meter. 10.8 mpg was a deal breaker for me. I didn't even drive it fast, just pootled about.


86wasagoodyear

788 posts

114 months

Excellent article once again, thanks Tony. Constantly interesting, entertaining.. very readable.
Good car too. Obviously the broken record moaning about RFL & fuel costs - but it's also an elegant 3.1/2 L 4-seat soft-top for 2 grand. Not much wrong with that.
On the summer time thing though, there is something lovely about driving with a soft-top down in the dark. Maybe now is the perfect time to get something like this for winter.

username_checksout

298 posts

18 months

PSB1967 said:
I test drove an Avant Quattro with this engine in Bristol. I reset the mpg meter, set off for a 20 mile drive and on return checked said meter. 10.8 mpg was a deal breaker for me. I didn't even drive it fast, just pootled about.
Slow speeds, crawling in traffic and stop/start drivibg will kill the economy of any car.

cerb4.5lee

38,855 posts

198 months

So much to like here for me. I like the way they look, I like Convertible's nowadays(although I didn't years ago for whatever reason though), l really like V6 petrol engines, plus I enjoy manual gearboxes too. I'm also used to the £760 tax on the 370Z Roadster, so I can just about cope with that as well(but I'll moan about it).

Count me in please. cool

Quhet

2,713 posts

164 months

I always felt that these cabs didn't have the same charm as the previous Audi 80 based model. There is a really sheddy TDI examples round by me though probably clouds my thinking

cerb4.5lee

38,855 posts

198 months

Quhet said:
I always felt that these cabs didn't have the same charm as the previous Audi 80 based model. There is a really sheddy TDI examples round by me though probably clouds my thinking
The Audi 80 based ones are lovely as you say, but these still look good to my eyes though.

BeastieBoy73

744 posts

130 months

WPA said:
No thanks, £760 RFL make zero sense on a shed money car.
It’s the exact opposite for me. I can justify paying that on a cheap car that won’t depreciate much.

WPA

12,465 posts

132 months

bennytheball said:
WPA said:
No thanks, £760 RFL make zero sense on a shed money car.
This is shed of the week, not bangernomics. The priority is to find something interesting for under £2k, not to find something that's cheap to run.

If this does 12,000 miles per year, it's going to cost £240 a month to fuel it, plus quite a bit on maintenance, so a few quid extra a month on RFL, whilst irritating, should hardly be a deal breaker.

Besides, if the RFL was £30 a year, it would be on sale for rather more than £2k...


Edited by bennytheball on Friday 10th October 07:37
It is £66 a month just in RFL, I hardly call that a few quid extra

Under £2k could get you an 04 3.0 sport (218bhp) manual with low miles and FSH plus only £430 RFL



https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202504010...

mart4856

156 posts

42 months

I have always admired the looks of these A4 cabs but for not much more upfront and lower running costs I would be looking for a decent 1.8 petrol manual.

If you must have a V6 then choose an older car to avoid the wallet busting VED.

carinaman

23,510 posts

190 months

WPA said:
bennytheball said:
WPA said:
No thanks, £760 RFL make zero sense on a shed money car.
This is shed of the week, not bangernomics. The priority is to find something interesting for under £2k, not to find something that's cheap to run.

If this does 12,000 miles per year, it's going to cost £240 a month to fuel it, plus quite a bit on maintenance, so a few quid extra a month on RFL, whilst irritating, should hardly be a deal breaker.

Besides, if the RFL was £30 a year, it would be on sale for rather more than £2k...


Edited by bennytheball on Friday 10th October 07:37
It is £66 a month just in RFL, I hardly call that a few quid extra

Under £2k could get you an 04 3.0 sport (218bhp) manual with low miles and FSH plus only £430 RFL



https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202504010...
No quattro on that so less weight as no prop and rear drive shafts and less transmissions losses may improve the MPG slightly?