Ferrari launches EV, share price dives 15%
Ferrari launches EV, share price dives 15%
Author
Discussion

DMZ

Original Poster:

1,871 posts

178 months

Yesterday (20:02)
quotequote all
If anyone can navigate what lies ahead it's Ferrari but the market doesn't seem convinced. For good reason I'd say.

limpsfield

6,376 posts

271 months

Yesterday (20:10)
quotequote all
It was their forward guidance apparently that caused the fall - and it is a big one, back to 6 month lows.

"Shares of Ferrari are on track for their worst trading day ever on Thursday after the luxury carmaker updated its full-year and 2030 guidance and scaled back its electrification ambitions.

Analysts were disappointed by the new guidance, saying it fell short of expectations."


Ferrari said that EVs would make up a smaller % than what it has previously stated.


"In a separate update, Ferrari said it would target a 2030 sports car model lineup made up of 40% internal combustion engine, or ICE, cars, 40% hybrid and 20% fully electric vehicles.

Ferrari said the revised target, which is down from a prior goal of 40% EV sales by the end of the decade, is the result of a client-centric approach, the current environment and its expected evolution."


https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/09/ferrari-unveils-fi...

Murph7355

40,560 posts

274 months

Yesterday (20:21)
quotequote all
DMZ said:
If anyone can navigate what lies ahead it's Ferrari but the market doesn't seem convinced. For good reason I'd say.
Yawn.

Have they even sold an EV yet? Their shares aren't diving "because EV".

Pistonheadsdicoverer

704 posts

64 months

Yesterday (22:11)
quotequote all
Correlation, Coincidence, Causation... The 3 Cs
Choose yours.

Terminator X

18,364 posts

222 months

Yesterday (22:15)
quotequote all
EV. Ferrari.

Pick one.

TX.

andrewpandrew

1,146 posts

7 months

Terminator X said:
EV. Ferrari.

Pick one.

TX.
This is what it boils down to for me, so I don’t really think Ferrari are in any position to navigate what lies ahead.

SDK

1,980 posts

271 months

Terminator X said:
EV. Ferrari.

Pick one.

TX.
Your world got destroyed because Ferrari is producing an EV - time to move on smile

ashenfie

1,723 posts

64 months

Ferrari’s reveal of the Elettrica’s chassis, motor, and battery pack, as well as a built-in system that amplifies the sounds of the electric engine in a bid to replicate the feeling that drivers get when they hear the visceral roar of a traditional supercar.

Mmm, A Super car roar or posh sounding washing machine sound. This is the problem no manufacturer has defined what makes a EV super car thats anyway exciting in the way any ICE super car inspires passion. Solve that and your company has a future.

The problem was that Ferrari also unveiled its financial projections for the rest of this decade, and they were lower than expected. No amount of laser

malaccamax

1,472 posts

249 months

ashenfie said:
Ferrari s reveal of the Elettrica s chassis, motor, and battery pack, as well as a built-in system that amplifies the sounds of the electric engine in a bid to replicate the feeling that drivers get when they hear the visceral roar of a traditional supercar.

Mmm, A Super car roar or posh sounding washing machine sound. This is the problem no manufacturer has defined what makes a EV super car thats anyway exciting in the way any ICE super car inspires passion. Solve that and your company has a future.

The problem was that Ferrari also unveiled its financial projections for the rest of this decade, and they were lower than expected. No amount of laser
It's amazing how much passion disappears when the buyer worries about residuals. No1 concern of the luxury car buyer according to a recent McKinsey study (luxury inc Ferrari, Lambo, Bentley etc). But if anyone can convince buyers about the benefits of EV, then it's Ferrari. The tech details sound v promising

TheRainMaker

7,266 posts

260 months

You would think Bentley and RR will be fine with EV.

Ferrari is screwed unless they change the rules and let small manufacturers carry on with ICE.


uktrailmonster

7,057 posts

218 months

It actually sounds pretty epic as a practical 4-seater GT. So it should have the same “daily” appeal as a Porsche Taycan, but with a more extrovert character.

It will be interesting to see how it compares with the Taycan, Lotus Emeya and Polestar 5. Obviously it will be more expensive, but it will be interesting to see if it can differentiate itself from these other near 1000 hp EVs. Quad-motor torque vectoring and accompanying sound effects could be key. It will probably have gear simulation too I expect.

It’s going to be a lot more useable than most of their current ICE supercars for sure.

TheRainMaker

7,266 posts

260 months

uktrailmonster said:
It s going to be a lot more useable than most of their current ICE supercars for sure.
This is totally missing the point of Ferrari.

Not many people buy a Ferrari for practical reasons hehe

uktrailmonster

7,057 posts

218 months

TheRainMaker said:
You would think Bentley and RR will be fine with EV.

Ferrari is screwed unless they change the rules and let small manufacturers carry on with ICE.
I don’t think they are screwed at all. But they do need to rethink their market to suit EV powertrains. This first attempt seems about right ie 4-seater uber GT.

uktrailmonster

7,057 posts

218 months

TheRainMaker said:
uktrailmonster said:
It s going to be a lot more useable than most of their current ICE supercars for sure.
This is totally missing the point of Ferrari.

Not many people buy a Ferrari for practical reasons hehe
They can still make pointless ICE supercar trophies which are a pita to actually drive on real roads and now they can also offer mega-powered EVs to replace whatever Ferrari owners currently drive when they are not posing in their impractical supercar.

TheRainMaker

7,266 posts

260 months

uktrailmonster said:
TheRainMaker said:
uktrailmonster said:
It s going to be a lot more useable than most of their current ICE supercars for sure.
This is totally missing the point of Ferrari.

Not many people buy a Ferrari for practical reasons hehe
They can still make pointless ICE supercar trophies which are a pita to actually drive on real roads and now they can also offer mega-powered EVs to replace whatever Ferrari owners currently drive when they are not posing in their impractical supercar.
I'm guessing from that reply, you are not their target market rofl

SDK

1,980 posts

271 months

TheRainMaker said:
uktrailmonster said:
TheRainMaker said:
uktrailmonster said:
It s going to be a lot more useable than most of their current ICE supercars for sure.
This is totally missing the point of Ferrari.

Not many people buy a Ferrari for practical reasons hehe
They can still make pointless ICE supercar trophies which are a pita to actually drive on real roads and now they can also offer mega-powered EVs to replace whatever Ferrari owners currently drive when they are not posing in their impractical supercar.
I'm guessing from that reply, you are not their target market rofl
To be fair - Harry Metcalfe said the 296 and SF90 needs more storage space. What's the point of a £400k+ car you can't even fit a carry on bag into. Selling cars of this cost, based on drive way Instagram photos can only go so far.

uktrailmonster

7,057 posts

218 months

TheRainMaker said:
I'm guessing from that reply, you are not their target market rofl
Well, I have always preferred Porsche because their cars are generally more usable on the road. I’m certainly the target market for a Taycan and that seems to be the market Ferrari are aiming at with their first EV. In their own words, they are playing to the inherent strengths of an EV drivetrain.

otolith

62,949 posts

222 months

The move from ICE to electric certainly creates a challenge for brands which have made their name from engines. But, they either figure it out, or accept that their long term future is not viable. Suspect that the share price dive reflects a lack of confidence in the plans they have published evidencing any figuring out.

The engine noise is not the only card Ferrari has in its deck. I would suggest that if it wants its electric cars to be worth what it wants to sell them for, it needs to make them more beautiful and better to drive than the competition. The way to make them drive better which cannot be cheaply replicated, I would suggest, is to make them lighter.

ChocolateFrog

32,842 posts

191 months

They could throw a couple of shields on a turd and generate a 2 year waiting list so I'll wait out on making any definitive statements.

Interesting times though.

SWoll

21,141 posts

276 months

TheRainMaker said:
This is totally missing the point of Ferrari.

Not many people buy a Ferrari for practical reasons hehe
They seem to be doing well with the 5 door Purosangue SUV despite capping production at 20% of total vehicles. Without the cap it would almost certainly be their biggest selling car

Similarly the Urus has been Lambos best selling car for years.