The Duchess of York and Epstein
The Duchess of York and Epstein
Author
Discussion

butchstewie

Original Poster:

60,404 posts

227 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all

Rufus Stone

10,983 posts

73 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
Why do you care?

119

14,096 posts

53 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
butchstewie said:
Another one.

Duchess of York called Epstein 'supreme friend' in 2011 email

WTF is it with these people.
And?

Anyway, whether it's true or not,

"A spokesperson for the duchess - the former wife of the Prince Andrew, the Duke of York - said the email was to counter a threat Epstein had made to sue her for defamation."

butchstewie

Original Poster:

60,404 posts

227 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
Royal and children's author whose ex-husband had a troubling relationship with a convicted child sex offender says of Epstein in public "I will never have anything to do with [Epstein] again." but privately writes to him calling him a "'steadfast, generous and supreme friend" and telling him "I saw all my children's work disappearing. I didn't want to hurt Andrew one more time.".

Quite right chaps nothing to see here don't know why it's even being reported.

Colonel Cupcake

1,299 posts

62 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
butchstewie said:
Royal and children's author whose ex-husband had a troubling relationship with a convicted child sex offender says of Epstein in public "I will never have anything to do with [Epstein] again." but privately writes to him calling him a "'steadfast, generous and supreme friend" and telling him "I saw all my children's work disappearing. I didn't want to hurt Andrew one more time.".

Quite right chaps nothing to see here don't know why it's even being reported.
Compared to this time last week, how is your life different now that it has been reported?

Jasandjules

71,387 posts

246 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
Have you any evidence she is aware he had paedo island? You know, did she, like let's say Bill Gates or Bill Clinton, visit it several times?

S600BSB

6,760 posts

123 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
butchstewie said:
Royal and children's author whose ex-husband had a troubling relationship with a convicted child sex offender says of Epstein in public "I will never have anything to do with [Epstein] again." but privately writes to him calling him a "'steadfast, generous and supreme friend" and telling him "I saw all my children's work disappearing. I didn't want to hurt Andrew one more time.".

Quite right chaps nothing to see here don't know why it's even being reported.
Dreadful woman.

butchstewie

Original Poster:

60,404 posts

227 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Have you any evidence she is aware he had paedo island? You know, did she, like let's say Bill Gates or Bill Clinton, visit it several times?
Remind me when she wrote the letter and when Epstein was convicted of procuring a child for prostitution and soliciting prostitution?

Jasandjules

71,387 posts

246 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
butchstewie said:
Remind me when she wrote the letter and when Epstein was convicted of procuring a child for prostitution and soliciting prostitution?
Did she visit paedo Island? Genuinely I don't know, I know Bill Gates did a dozen times or more, Bill Clinton did several times and a number of other celebs but no idea if she did.

I will however agree that if a former friend of mine was convicted of such matters they would no longer be a friend nor would I have anything to do with them, so I take your point on that.

Rufus Stone

10,983 posts

73 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
butchstewie said:
Remind me when she wrote the letter and when Epstein was convicted of procuring a child for prostitution and soliciting prostitution?
What would you like to happen to her now then?

119

14,096 posts

53 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
Colonel Cupcake said:
butchstewie said:
Royal and children's author whose ex-husband had a troubling relationship with a convicted child sex offender says of Epstein in public "I will never have anything to do with [Epstein] again." but privately writes to him calling him a "'steadfast, generous and supreme friend" and telling him "I saw all my children's work disappearing. I didn't want to hurt Andrew one more time.".

Quite right chaps nothing to see here don't know why it's even being reported.
Compared to this time last week, how is your life different now that it has been reported?
hehe

okgo

40,752 posts

215 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
Weird that there are so many apologists for this stuff on PH. Suspect I’ll have a nose over at the Tommy Robinson thread and it’s the same people posting there.

119

14,096 posts

53 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
okgo said:
Weird that there are so many apologists for this stuff on PH. Suspect I ll have a nose over at the Tommy Robinson thread and it s the same people posting there.
Who’s apologisting?

Or is it perhaps that not everyone cares?




butchstewie

Original Poster:

60,404 posts

227 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
okgo said:
Weird that there are so many apologists for this stuff on PH. Suspect I ll have a nose over at the Tommy Robinson thread and it s the same people posting there.
Quite.

Epstein.

Of all the hills to die on.

Rufus Stone

10,983 posts

73 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
butchstewie said:
Quite.

Epstein.

Of all the hills to die on.
Oh stop talking crap. Nobody is supporting Epstein.

butchstewie

Original Poster:

60,404 posts

227 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
Rufus you have a royal writing terribly apologetic almost grovelling letters to a convicted sex offender.

In most circumstances that's news worthy and most peoples first reaction would be that it's appalling judgement by Ferguson and shouldn't be downplayed.

On here it's either "why do you care?" or "whether it's true or not" or "how is your life different now that it has been reported".

If you don't care just ignore the thread.

Simple.

Square Leg

15,513 posts

206 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
You know Rufus is only on PH to be contrary and incendiary…

Anyway - Sarah Ferguson.. since when has she been relevant?
Can’t see what she writes to whoever has any bearing on our country, unlike a Gov minister..

119

14,096 posts

53 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
Square Leg said:
You know Rufus is only on PH to be contrary and incendiary

Anyway - Sarah Ferguson.. since when has she been relevant?
Can t see what she writes to whoever has any bearing on our country, unlike a Gov minister..
I think things like this are classed as deflection.

butchstewie

Original Poster:

60,404 posts

227 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
Square Leg said:
You know Rufus is only on PH to be contrary and incendiary

Anyway - Sarah Ferguson.. since when has she been relevant?
Can t see what she writes to whoever has any bearing on our country, unlike a Gov minister..
She's involved with several children's charities for a starts.

Not sure how that can be squared with a friendship and a letter like that to Epstein.

119

14,096 posts

53 months

Sunday 21st September
quotequote all
butchstewie said:
Square Leg said:
You know Rufus is only on PH to be contrary and incendiary

Anyway - Sarah Ferguson.. since when has she been relevant?
Can t see what she writes to whoever has any bearing on our country, unlike a Gov minister..
She's involved with several children's charities for a starts.

Not sure how that can be squared with a friendship and a letter like that to Epstein.
So, in your mind she 100% knew what was going on but carried on with the friendship regardless?