Fish removed from nature reserve
Fish removed from nature reserve
Author
Discussion

cotty

Original Poster:

42,244 posts

314 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
I was going to make some comment on the claim culture we have in the UK that has led to this but words fail me

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/south_yorkshire/4306462.stm

[quote=BBC]A South Yorkshire council is so determined to stop people from angling at a nature reserve it has removed all the fish.
Sheffield City Council said it had decided to take the unusual step to help prevent accidents at the Shire Brook Valley Reserve.

In 2004, the Health and Safety Executive banned fishing at the site because of safety concerns.

Councillor David Barker said: "Fishing somewhere else is the only option."

The move follows an accident last year when a teenager carrying a fishing rod received an electric shock from nearby cables, resulting in serious burns.

Mr Barker said: "It is impossible to enter the reserve from most directions without passing under a high voltage pylon, so the risk of electrocution will always be there.

"It is unfortunate that a few individuals have made the fish removal necessary as the change in policy has so clearly been made to protect anglers and ensure that there will never be a recurrence of last year's accident."

The fish have been taken to other ponds and lakes in the district where fishing is allowed. [/quote]

vixpy1

42,699 posts

294 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
Strewth...

Do these Fkwits pettyness know no bounds!

esselte

14,626 posts

297 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
My mum used to live a couple of miles away from the park and the power cables are really low.I could see how it could be easy to come into contact with them when casting in if you are unaware of them or a little careless.Don't know if this is a reason for shifting the fish tho'.

cotty

Original Poster:

42,244 posts

314 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
Vixpy1 - Obviously not.

Why not drain the lake in case anyone falls in and drowns, cut the trees down in case anyone walks into one etc etc...........

How can it be a nature reserve if they are taking the nature out of it, surely relocating the power lines would be a better solution.

>> Edited by cotty on Tuesday 4th October 16:16

iansull

1,940 posts

276 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
And next weeks story:

"South Yorkshire council has removed house keys from all of its constituants and locked them at home for the foreseeable future.

A spokesman(sorry,person)said "there have been too many incidents involving people outside of their homes,so we have decided to keep them indoors so to protect them. We will be removing their household items too as the potential for injury is too great to risk".

esselte

14,626 posts

297 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
vixpy1 said:
Strewth...

Do these Fkwits pettyness know no bounds!


Which would they be the HSE or the council?

bigandclever

14,390 posts

268 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
How ironic it's the fishermen getting fried...

gasblaster

27,584 posts

309 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
Will removing the fish stop people fishing? How will they know?

esselte

14,626 posts

297 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
bigandclever said:
How ironic it's the fishermen getting fried...


cotty

Original Poster:

42,244 posts

314 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
iansull said:
And next weeks story:

"South Yorkshire council has removed house keys from all of its constituants and locked them at home for the foreseeable future.

A spokesman(sorry,person)said "there have been too many incidents involving people outside of their homes,so we have decided to keep them indoors so to protect them. We will be removing their household items too as the potential for injury is too great to risk".


dont you know that most accidents happen in the home you need to lock them OUT not IN

puggit

49,807 posts

278 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
Any moron capable of fishing under cables and electrocuting themselves will ignore signs advising of a lack of fish and carry on regardless.

Also unless they can drain the pond fully, I bet they don't get all the fish out, especially the younger ones.

So what's the point?

vixpy1

42,699 posts

294 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
esselte said:

vixpy1 said:
Strewth...

Do these Fkwits pettyness know no bounds!



Which would they be the HSE or the council?


In my experience .. BOTH!

JagLover

46,786 posts

265 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
The concept of personal responsibility is fading fast.

All they need are clear signs warning of the danger, then let people make up their own minds, if they fry so be it.

kerfuffle

5,253 posts

284 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
Have they no sense of scale?

cotty

Original Poster:

42,244 posts

314 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
puggit said:
Any moron capable of fishing under cables and electrocuting themselves will ignore signs advising of a lack of fish and carry on regardless.


He probably said to his mate "they arent live you know, look I can touch them with my rod "

esselte

14,626 posts

297 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
JagLover said:
The concept of personal responsibility is fading fast.

All they need are clear signs warning of the danger, then let people make up their own minds, if they fry so be it.



I agree JL but it doesn't seem to work that way these days.Who's to blame, the claimants or the lawyers?

JagLover

46,786 posts

265 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
esselte said:

JagLover said:
The concept of personal responsibility is fading fast.

All they need are clear signs warning of the danger, then let people make up their own minds, if they fry so be it.




I agree JL but it doesn't seem to work that way these days.Who's to blame, the claimants or the lawyers?


both and a legal system which let's them get away with it

kerfuffle

5,253 posts

284 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
I'm gutted

cotty

Original Poster:

42,244 posts

314 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
esselte said:
I agree JL but it doesn't seem to work that way these days.Who's to blame, the claimants or the lawyers?


In this case the idiots who put power cables through a nature reserve ie an area reserved for nature not something with the potential to kill you (not saying that nature cant kill you)

esselte

14,626 posts

297 months

Tuesday 4th October 2005
quotequote all
cotty said:

esselte said:
I agree JL but it doesn't seem to work that way these days.Who's to blame, the claimants or the lawyers?



In this case the idiots who put power cables through a nature reserve ie an area reserved for nature not something with the potential to kill you (not saying that nature cant kill you)


Actally it was the other way round.The area was an old coal mine previous to being a "nature reserve" (it's a rather posh name for what is in effect a pond with rushes in it)