Fibre - WiFi - machine 'chain' speeds thoughts.

Fibre - WiFi - machine 'chain' speeds thoughts.

Author
Discussion

POIDH

Original Poster:

1,807 posts

80 months

Sunday 6th July
quotequote all
Time to change broadband contract, and we've got full fibre in the street now and that's all I'm being offered. We've made 50mbps work with a couple of gamers in the house and me occasionally working from home. Usual streaming in an evening. I'm sticking with Plusnet.

However, I'm just working out a few things:
- While I can pay for silly speed up to 900mbps, I'm surely only as fast as the other parts of the 'chain' such as (Hub 2) router, pc or phones etc attached.
- we only use WiFi from (Hub 2) router
- small house, no need for mesh.
- only one really powerful PC, the rest are modest phones and laptop or pc.

So going from our current 50mbps (usually nearer 40mbps) to 145mbps will be basically as fast in reality as we need - and 900mbps will 'need' wires connections, faster/better router, fast ethernet cards, faster laptops or phones etc to truly benefit from it?



Captain_Morgan

1,358 posts

74 months

Sunday 6th July
quotequote all
Yep if you ve made it with 50Mb/s the 150Mb/s will be fine.

As you ve said you don t have a large volume of devices all down/up loading constantly around 25Mb/s is a 4K film so lots of capacity for those, take the low cost option.

bitchstewie

58,622 posts

225 months

Sunday 6th July
quotequote all
A lot of people focus on speed and ignore latency.

If you're a gamer latency is likely much more important to you than pure throughput.

geeks

10,462 posts

154 months

Sunday 6th July
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
A lot of people focus on speed and ignore latency.

If you're a gamer latency is likely much more important to you than pure throughput.
This, which is why gamers mostly hate wifi too

BlueMR2

8,861 posts

217 months

Sunday 6th July
quotequote all
Always wire anything you can.

Then let the things that can’t share the bandwidth.

the-norseman

14,271 posts

186 months

Sunday 6th July
quotequote all
I'm on a 900 connection.

My Linux desktop that I am on now will get 200ish up and down on Wifi, on wired it will get the 900.

megaphone

11,216 posts

266 months

Sunday 6th July
quotequote all
Many pay for speeds they don't need, the ISPs up-sell them higher speeds they don't need, more £s for the ISP.

40 mbps is fine for the average user, so my advise is go for the cheapest lowest speed you can get and don't let them upsell you with a 'free upgrade'.

OutInTheShed

11,343 posts

41 months

Sunday 6th July
quotequote all
Our internet can occasionally go slow, maybe if the county is full of tourists and we get a wet day...
When we notice it's slow, fast.com usually reports 3Mbit/s or less.

Over the past couple of years, our normal speed has crept up from about 12M to 35 or 40M.
All we've noticed is 'go slows' are less common.

4G data, OTOH has gone to the dogs with o2.

wyson

3,507 posts

119 months

Sunday 6th July
quotequote all
I m going to bump upto 1gbps as soon as I get my first wifi 7 device, which should comfortably carry that bandwidth.

Quite happy for the moment with 500mpbs on wifi 6. That s about as fast as my wifi 6 devices and router can handle.

The rule of thumb I use, is to half the ISP connection speed compared to the fastest theoretical router / device connection.

I’m not one of these fast enough people. I want the fastest connection I can get for a reasonable cost, to make the internet as seamless as possible. 1gpbs is only £5 a month more than a 500mbps connection. Good wifi 7 routers have dropped below £200 quid also. All quite reasonable expenses in my eye.



Edited by wyson on Sunday 6th July 19:33

camel_landy

5,208 posts

198 months

Sunday 6th July
quotequote all
Latency is key.

Unless you're doing big data transfers, anything above 100Mbs is irrelevant and latency becomes the most important measure.

...and even though you might be in a small house, don't underestimate a decent network.

M

LuS1fer

42,533 posts

260 months

Sunday 6th July
quotequote all
They do try to flog you stuff you don't need.

I am on TalkTalk 150 which varies according to load.

Out of contract, they write and say I can stick with what I've got at 30.70 and have an inflation increase every year or

I can have exactly the same with a 2 year contract for 30.70 and a £3 a year rise ( why would I do that?) or

I can pay 48 quid for the 900 (I think) and it will go up 3 quid every year thereafter. So that's another no.

gangzoom

7,340 posts

230 months

Monday 7th July
quotequote all
camel_landy said:
Latency is key.

Unless you're doing big data transfers, anything above 100Mbs is irrelevant and latency becomes the most important measure.

...and even though you might be in a small house, don't underestimate a decent network.

M
We are only on 70Mbps and can stream GeForceNow, 4K Netflix, and someone doing a Teams meeting at the same time with no issue, however that's with the TVs, Shield, and study all running off ethernet, latency sits at 10-15ms, and some days we get through nearly 100Gig of data usage.

'Weapons grade WiFi' however is a different matter, I've essentially have had to put a mesh node in everyroom that hasn't got a wired connection to ensure we can get at least 50Mpbs in every room, so have 5 nodes for a 4 bedroom bungalow, with 3 being back hauled with ethernet. If I'm honest probably could do with a 6th node, for the far end of the house/cover the garage properly.

If we got the chance to upgrade to proper Fibre, 150Mpbs would be more than enough, but don't skimp on the WiFi setup. Sadly I don't think we're getting proper Fibre into the house any time soon frown.


Edited by gangzoom on Monday 7th July 06:42

John87

910 posts

173 months

Monday 7th July
quotequote all
I've been on 70Mb for a while now as I've had the Zen lifetime price guarantee so been reluctant to move. I'm going up to 900Mb next week from a new supplier because it is around the same price as currently and not much more expensive than the same supplier on 500Mb.

I mainly connect via WiFi but do have a Deco Mesh with WiFi 6E which should be capable of the full speed. The main Deco unit has a 1GB upper limit for wired connections so wouldn't go any higher for now. My work computer is wired to a second Deco unit with the mesh itself WiFi only. I find this gives the best balance of reliability and lack of wires everywhere.

The main reason for me going to a much higher speed is reliability during school holidays. We have two of us WFH most days and during holidays the kids want to stream YouTube etc while the family member looking after them may also be watching something different. It was just getting too much for my connection and I was dropping work calls too often to maintain professionalism. It will also be useful for gaming because I have PC Gamepass and like to try new things. Nothing more annoying than spending 10 hours downloading a game for it to be rubbish!

Griffith4ever

5,565 posts

50 months

Monday 7th July
quotequote all
You won't need "faster ethernet cards" unless your laptops or pc has 100Mb cards, which is highly unlikely.

145Mb will almost certainly be perfect for you. I have 850Mb down and the ONLY time that bandwidth gets used is downloading movies - where I get a 16Gb file in about 4 mins! - but I never need it that fast. I'm on 5G hence the speeds - costs me £20 a month.

Any router that has Gb ethernet ports will handle your 900Mb. Wifi won't utilise it all. I've just done a speed test from my Suface Pro 9, in bed!, router in room next door. 300Mb down (I get 850 on my LAN connected PC). Wifi 6

Edited by Griffith4ever on Monday 7th July 08:01

trashbat

6,126 posts

168 months

Monday 7th July
quotequote all
What makes you think Hub 2 isn't good enough?

Lucas Ayde

3,913 posts

183 months

Monday 7th July
quotequote all
I've had 900mbit/sec fibre for over a year and it's very nice. However, the only time I ever come close to using all the speed is when downloading/updating Steam games on the PC. It's extremely quick to do huge game downloads or patches as it can pretty much max out the connection. PS5 downloads are fast too but they don't use as much of the bandwidth as Steam can use if you let it.

Aside from that, I see no functional difference to the previous 75mbit/sec FttC that I had. However, the price was actually lower and the router is much better for WiFi (plus it came with a disc that meshes directly with it whereas before I was having to run a seperate 3-disc mesh to get decent WiFi coverage).

If you can save a bit of money and go for 500mbit/sec I'm sure it would be more than good enough. Probably even 300.

Edit: Actually, it's good for Usenet downloads too. If I use 3x servers I can pretty much max it out.

Edited by Lucas Ayde on Monday 7th July 13:04

wyson

3,507 posts

119 months

Monday 7th July
quotequote all
For me the biggest advantage to that speed are updates. 500mbps laughs in the face of a 2.1GB Apple update. I m hoping 1gbps will laugh even harder. Whatever you want to do, you don t have to think twice nor plan ahead when speeds get in this range.

I ve tried various speeds over the years, from dial up, to 10mbps, 50 mbps, 70 mbps etc. I think 150gbps was when you start to feel free and not have to think about your connection speed. I wouldn t accept anything below that, with 300mbps being a comfortable starting point. The faster the better!

Most recently, I didn’t have time to complete an online course in the time given, so I downloaded it. Was about 8gb in total. Again didn’t think twice, clicked download and carried on working as normal. I think it was complete in 7 or 8 mins. With a 50mbps connection, I would have had to stop work and nurse that, or do it in the evening.

Edited by wyson on Monday 7th July 13:49

RizzoTheRat

26,852 posts

207 months

Monday 7th July
quotequote all
With Wifi6 on a 5GHz channel you should be able to get at least 200Mbps,and with line of sight to the access point / router, 500+. My wife gets about 250-300 on her laptop with 2 internal walls between her and he access point. If its possible to run a cable to your gamers PC it's well worth doing though, it'll get the full internet speeds and faster ping times.

I have no need for the 750Mbps my PC gets on a wired connection, but it is nice on the occasion when I download a large file, or when my backups run to the NAS at 1Gb/s.

For reference, streaming 4K video uses about 20-25k. Our internet/TV cable provider sent us a new TV box the other week and it's internet only, with no connection to the Coax like our old box, so having it wired via a 1Gb switch rather than competing with other devices in the house over wifi is nice.

ETA: I hadn't realised Hub 2 is Wifi 5, while in theory Wifi5 can do 400BMbps or so in practice you're more likely to get up to about 250 in my experience.

Edited by RizzoTheRat on Monday 7th July 13:53

jan8p

1,785 posts

243 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
If you have decent WiFi, 900Mbit is doable even with WiFi6.

I run WiFi6 Omada APs around the house, all wired with either 1Gb or 2.5Gb ethernet, and I can pull 900Mbit on my MacBook over WiFi no problem.

vladcjelli

3,234 posts

173 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
How much more money is the full fat fibre experience?

Which fibre providers can you get in your area?

These questions have more bearing on what you choose, over and above “what could I possibly need the extra bandwidth/speed for?”