Stamp duty question

Author
Discussion

Mr Squarekins

Original Poster:

1,308 posts

77 months

Wednesday 18th June
quotequote all
Can anyone explain what happens in term of stamp duty in the following scenario please?

Two parties, agree to swap properties. One is downsizing, the other upsizing.

£100k difference in the properties. £100k would be paid as part of the deal. All normal solicitor legals would be performed.

Does stamp duty work in exactly the same way as if the purchases were not linked in any way?

mdw

391 posts

289 months

Wednesday 18th June
quotequote all
My parents did this 5 years ago and from memory stamp duty was paid on the full amount just like on a normal sale.

ARHarh

4,727 posts

122 months

Wednesday 18th June
quotequote all
It will still be seen as buying the house for market value even if you don't exchange that amount of cash. You are still exchanging that amount of value.

Mr Squarekins

Original Poster:

1,308 posts

77 months

Wednesday 18th June
quotequote all
My only other thought was. What if both parties agreed lower prices for their properties? E.g instead of £800k I'll give you £200k? No other parties involved, but is that legal? Avoidance rather than evasion?

Mr Whippy

31,060 posts

256 months

Wednesday 18th June
quotequote all
Sell the big house for £100,000, the cheap house for £0.

Then charge £500k or whatever for the carpets hehe

Mr Squarekins

Original Poster:

1,308 posts

77 months

Wednesday 18th June
quotequote all
Mr Whippy said:
Sell the big house for £100,000, the cheap house for £0.

Then charge £500k or whatever for the carpets hehe
I thought it, but didn't want to be the one to say it smile

Sheepshanks

37,100 posts

134 months

Wednesday 18th June
quotequote all
I suppose if there was sufficient trust between the parties then one house could be gifted and the other sold for £100K.

Mr Squarekins

Original Poster:

1,308 posts

77 months

Wednesday 18th June
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
I suppose if there was sufficient trust between the parties then one house could be gifted and the other sold for £100K.
I wouldn't be trying to completely avoid tax. Just reduce it for both parties if it was legal under this circumstances.

Thus agreeing prices at a lower value, not zero for. As long as £100k difference, I see no reason why lower prices cannot be agreed between two parties. But, I'm no lawyer.

Jobbo

13,369 posts

279 months

Wednesday 18th June
quotequote all
If you’re exchanging properties then each party pays SDLT based on the market value: https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/stamp-dut...

98elise

29,717 posts

176 months

Wednesday 18th June
quotequote all
ARHarh said:
It will still be seen as buying the house for market value even if you don't exchange that amount of cash. You are still exchanging that amount of value.
This.

A true gift (no money or assets in exchange) doesn’t trigger SDLT, but exchanging houses would as its an asset with value (just like money).

119

11,769 posts

51 months

Wednesday 18th June
quotequote all
Reasonably sure undervaluing a property will not go well!

Mr Squarekins

Original Poster:

1,308 posts

77 months

Wednesday 18th June
quotequote all
Thanks for confirming. I expected as much, but worth asking. Still looking to swap, just now clear on the situation. Thanks.

TA14

13,094 posts

273 months

Wednesday 18th June
quotequote all
Mr Squarekins said:
Thanks for confirming. I expected as much, but worth asking. Still looking to swap, just now clear on the situation. Thanks.
For each house, it might be worth getting 7 or 8 RICS valuations and using the most favourable 2 or 3. Depends what the rate of duty is at the values you are considering.

Mr Whippy

31,060 posts

256 months

Wednesday 18th June
quotequote all
Having recently moved, you do fill out a big long document about contents.

In theory you could suggest you re taking everything with you (carpets, lights, bulbs, electric fittings, doors, appliances, yadda yadda), and then subtract that from the market value

If you extended that to garden plants it could get quite fun but not sure when Rachel would come knocking for her lost revenue hehe



Combined with the above survey valuations method it could save something… but you’d have to make sure both parties are happy to spend money to hopefully save money!