RE: 2025 BMW 230i (G42) | UK Review

RE: 2025 BMW 230i (G42) | UK Review

Wednesday 4th June

2025 BMW 230i (G42) | UK Review

No straight-six, no xDrive, not many M badges - and really rather nice


On PistonHeads, the M2 is inevitably the focus of the 2 Series range. It’s the quickest and pointiest offering, of course, but also the only 2 Series with a manual gearbox option, the basis for the special editions, and the entry point in 2025 to full-fat M car ownership. That entry point is further away than anyone would like it to be, but still - even if the junior M car isn’t so junior anymore, it’s always going to get a lot of attention on PH. 

But there’s more to the 2 Series than just the M2, and in a world so short of rear-drive, two-door coupes, they certainly warrant more than a mention. There’s the M240i, for starters, which is fantastic, and probably unfairly lives in the M car’s shadow – xDrive and all. Then there are the non-M cars; where not so long ago that would have meant all manner of engine options, from three-cylinder to diesel, now it’s just a 2.0-litre. There’s a choice of 184hp, 220i, or this 245hp 230i. Recently revised with new materials, paints, wheels, and the introduction of Operating System 8.5 to BMW’s smallest coupe, a revisit was long overdue. 

Especially as, to these eyes at least, the ordinary 2 Series are probably the more stylish variants. Maybe not quite the praise it would once have been, but where M versions can seem overly pumped up and pugnacious, there’s something quite charming about an unadorned, slimline BMW coupe. The proportions are good, the kidney grilles seem about right for the size of the car, and there’s not a BMW out there that won’t be improved for a new-for-this-facelift slathering of Portimao Blue. Sure, some of the details are still a bit odd, but if we accept that all the 2 and 1 Series Coupes have been more two-door saloons than true coupes - as well as never truly great to look at - then this latest G42 scores pretty well. Or perhaps all the really bad big BMWs have skewed judgement of the not-so-big ones. 

The 2 Series interior is a brilliant mix of old and new. There are manually adjustable, cloth sports seats, which feel like a real novelty in 2025, dropping derriere to the deck in a way that very few others do. There’s the dramatic dual screen that melds instrument cluster and infotainment into one giant in-car iMax, and that’s bound to impress in a car that’s less than £40k in 220i form. The vibe is definitely of those minimalist penthouses from social media we’re all meant to aspire to, which is usually disastrous for functionality. However, here there's the best of both worlds, because it also comes with some BMW usability: the older wheel, iDrive, and mode button arrangement is welcome. It means changes you make regularly, like volume and drive setting, are easily adjusted. 

While it would be great to report a sub-M 2 Series with a fantastic engine, that’s not really the case. The 2.0-litre B48 might be two-thirds of a 3.0-litre B58 - raved about in everything from Supra to Plus Six - but it remains relatively plain. Torque is plentiful, lag is minimal, and the match-up with the eight-speed auto is slick. It’s inoffensive, let's put it that way, fast and efficient enough without ever being especially memorable. The most abiding impression is of how nice it is to deploy 245hp without concern for the front wheels; however good hot hatches are, there’s nothing to match that innate balance of rear wheels powering and front wheels turning. It all feels very sophisticated for what’s ultimately a relatively humble performance car by modern standards. 

That general sense of maturity characterises much about the driving experience, some way from the fast and furious M cars. Grip and traction are really strong, the brakes can’t really be faulted in typical use, and broadly speaking, the 2 Series controls its masses well. Indeed, at 1,600kg it must rank as one of the sveltest BMWs on sale, and it’s lovely not to be forced into configuring every element of the car. There’s some synthetic sound and equally artificial weight to add to proceedings, but that’s about it. 

Turn-in isn’t M car immediate, though it is good, wheel and axle nicely in sync as well as benefitting from less weight over the nose. The relative modesty of the dimensions makes it suitable for B roads in a way that bigger BMWs just aren’t. And that feeling through the seat of being pushed around the corner rather than pulled remains a pleasure. A subtle one, but a pleasure nonetheless.

The 230i stops some way short of being an ultimate driving machine, though. Or whatever the BMW phrase is now. The passive M Sport suspension is good, for example, though nothing more than that. It can be tad brusque and bouncy at town speeds, only to be found wanting a little when really stretched, heaving a bit over undulations. For the majority of users for the majority of time, this is good - secure, accurate, and comfy enough. But it goes to show how clever those M cars are, heavier and more complex while also plusher and better controlled. 

The optional 19-inch wheels here probably didn’t help the 2 Series’ cause; the best ride and handling balance is likely to be on the standard 18s. For those that care, of course - most will surely prefer the extra attitude of the big wheels over better B-road ability. As it is, this 230i is more than sorted enough. This sounds like damning it with faint praise, but there really aren’t many cars out there that score so consistently well across the board. From the interior quality to the refinement, the performance to the boot space, there’s very little to fault - it just misses that one aspect to make it compelling. 

Which, in truth, is probably exactly how a 2.0-litre, four-cylinder BMW 2 Series should be. It’s good to drive, lovely to be in and will likely be a cinch to own, albeit with clear scope to up the excitement a bit further. So when the time comes to upgrade, it will only seem logical to move up the 2 range; there’s a lot of great stuff here you wouldn’t want to give up.

Assuming, of course, that it’s the 230i that’s moved up from. In a world where nothing really like the 2 Series - front-engined, rear-drive, two seats, £40k - exists anymore, the closest rival to the 230i is probably the M240i xDrive. The one with the smarter chassis, turbo straight-six, and M Performance goodies. While £7k more at list, a PCP deal through BMW for an M240i is currently only a tenner more a month with all other conditions identical. And there can’t be many who wouldn’t pay that. So while the 230i is a great introduction to the world of rear-wheel drive, ‘proper’ BMW motoring - and certainly with lower running costs than a 3.0-litre version - the allure of a big six for not very much more a month might be hard to resist.  


SPECIFICATION | 2025 BMW 230i M SPORT

Engine: 1,998cc, four-cyl turbo
Transmission: 8-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 245@5000-6500rpm
Torque: 295
0-62mph: 5.9sec
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 1,600kg
MPG: 42.8
CO2: 155g/km
Price: £41,028.33 (price as standard; price as tested £48,398.34 including Portimao Blue paint for £595, 19-inch Style 995 wheels for £700, Comfort Pack (Adaptive LED Headlights, Comfort Access, Storage for wireless charging) for £1,715, Sun protection glass for £350, Folding wing mirrors with auto-dimming for £300, Heated steering wheel for £185, M Sport brakes with dark blue calipers for £590, M Sport package pro (Sport auto transmission with paddles, BMW Individual Lights Shadow Line, M Sport seat belts, HiFi Loudspeaker audio, M Sport spoiler,  BMW Individual high-gloss Shadow Line with extended contents) for £1,850. Price correct as of 23/01/2025)

Author
Discussion

SpadeBrigade

Original Poster:

757 posts

153 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
It’s a handsome car, looks much better with the body coded trim instead of the gloss black on the pre LCI (what were they thinking?!).

The m240 is probably the best car they make, and looks better than an M2 IMO. Nicer front end.

Spuffington

1,275 posts

182 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
All very lovely but given the very faint praise on offer, can't help thinking that my 2016 228i M Sport coupe I picked up for £15k from AUC with 41k seems even more of a bargain versus this for £25k more with very little more in driving dynamics on offer. getmecoat

Firebobby

810 posts

53 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
All in all very inoffensive but not much to write home about either! It'll do the job without shouting about it and no doubt plenty of people will pick one up on a good PCP deal. Personally I'd rather have a 2 year old 240i than a new one of these.

cerb4.5lee

36,592 posts

194 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
This will be a very likeable daily I'd imagine, and I enjoyed the write up.

Pughmacher

427 posts

57 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Probably the version that hits a sweet spot for many. Lack of alternative is something that BMW is no doubt aware of. It’s a little plain which is odd considering new BMW’s. Are we becoming ever so slightly used to the brashness they’ve been supplying? Glad it’s available. Not really in the market but it’s nice to know that they’re there for a few years down the line when I get the itch for a RWD coupe to replace my F21 hatch.

croyde

24,664 posts

244 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
First new Beemer I've seen in a while that I like the look of.

I still miss my 2.5l 3 series that I owned for 23 years. Damn you ULEZ! Khaaaaaaaan!

Wardy78

852 posts

72 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Spuffington said:
All very lovely but given the very faint praise on offer, can't help thinking that my 2016 228i M Sport coupe I picked up for £15k from AUC with 41k seems even more of a bargain versus this for £25k more with very little more in driving dynamics on offer. getmecoat
9 year old car looks a bargain compared to a brand new car?


Back on the car itself. It's a shame the 2.0T from the M135 doesn't fit. That would have made for a very compelling case.

theicemario

1,131 posts

89 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
As far as current ICE cars go, this one’s one of my favourites.
Looks ace in that blue. Reckon it d make for a lovely daily driver.

Luxury tax must be a killer on these, they re a rare sight on UK roads. You d have to go for the 220i and do without any of the 3 optional packs to dodge that.




MyV10BarksAndBites

1,287 posts

63 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
A 30i.... without a 3.0 engine is..... A fake 30i....

dukebox9reg

1,625 posts

162 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Wardy78 said:
9 year old car looks a bargain compared to a brand new car?


Back on the car itself. It's a shame the 2.0T from the M135 doesn't fit. That would have made for a very compelling case.
No reason why it wouldn't, will be more of a market/customer decision rather than a technical. The cost would probably put it too close to the 240. The 135 and 240 are with a few quid of each other.

Wardy78

852 posts

72 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
theicemario said:
Luxury tax must be a killer on these, they re a rare sight on UK roads. You d have to go for the 220i and do without any of the 3 optional packs to dodge that.
Makes an utter mockery of the VED expensive car allowance surplus when even a barely warm, small BMW becomes classed as an 'expensive car' if you add any options to it.

Wardy78

852 posts

72 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
MyV10BarksAndBites said:
A 30i.... without a 3.0 engine is..... A fake 30i....
Because it's not 2010 anymore. Keep up ;-)


Wardy78

852 posts

72 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
dukebox9reg said:
Wardy78 said:
9 year old car looks a bargain compared to a brand new car?


Back on the car itself. It's a shame the 2.0T from the M135 doesn't fit. That would have made for a very compelling case.
No reason why it wouldn't, will be more of a market/customer decision rather than a technical. The cost would probably put it too close to the 240. The 135 and 240 are with a few quid of each other.
The M135 engine is a transverse fitting. I suspect the engineering would be the prohibitive factor. A RWD non-M 230i with that 2.0T engine needn't be much if any more expensive.

DonkeyApple

61,929 posts

183 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
I think the shame here is that this could be a NA i6 and ditch all of the downsides of the accountant's turbo. Surely they won't be selling so many of these that it will devastate their fleet emissions? Given the end of days in more than a few high value markets for ICE, why are some manufacturers persisting with downsizing on every single model rather than delivering some archaic celebrations that will boost their brand values and win over some key consumers?

cerb4.5lee

36,592 posts

194 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Wardy78 said:
dukebox9reg said:
Wardy78 said:
9 year old car looks a bargain compared to a brand new car?


Back on the car itself. It's a shame the 2.0T from the M135 doesn't fit. That would have made for a very compelling case.
No reason why it wouldn't, will be more of a market/customer decision rather than a technical. The cost would probably put it too close to the 240. The 135 and 240 are with a few quid of each other.
The M135 engine is a transverse fitting. I suspect the engineering would be the prohibitive factor. A RWD non-M 230i with that 2.0T engine needn't be much if any more expensive.
It is essentially the same B48 2.0 turbo 4 cylinder from the M135 anyway isn't it?

Wardy78

852 posts

72 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
Wardy78 said:
dukebox9reg said:
Wardy78 said:
9 year old car looks a bargain compared to a brand new car?


Back on the car itself. It's a shame the 2.0T from the M135 doesn't fit. That would have made for a very compelling case.
No reason why it wouldn't, will be more of a market/customer decision rather than a technical. The cost would probably put it too close to the 240. The 135 and 240 are with a few quid of each other.
The M135 engine is a transverse fitting. I suspect the engineering would be the prohibitive factor. A RWD non-M 230i with that 2.0T engine needn't be much if any more expensive.
It is essentially the same B48 2.0 turbo 4 cylinder from the M135 anyway isn't it?
Dunno, I can't think it's totally separate. No manufacturer would design two 1998cc turbo engines......surely?

7 5 7

3,782 posts

125 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Think I would have to debadge it....it aint a 3.0

cerb4.5lee

36,592 posts

194 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
7 5 7 said:
Think I would have to debadge it....it aint a 3.0
It has more torque than the old 3.0 NA engine though, so I'd be happy enough leaving it on. In fact it has exactly the same amount of torque that my old V8 4.0 M3 had as well. Crazy really.

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,350 posts

112 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Nice colour.... I've got it's predecessor engine in a 328i ( I think ). Review was spot on - it has no character whatsoever but gets the job done in an inoffensive sort of way. Been very reliable over 150k miles....

Fox-

13,435 posts

260 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Wardy78 said:
9 year old car looks a bargain compared to a brand new car?


Back on the car itself. It's a shame the 2.0T from the M135 doesn't fit. That would have made for a very compelling case.
It does fit, because it's the same engine in a different tune. The car doesn't have the 300bhp variant because the M240i exists in the range.