Range question for i3s users

Author
Discussion

hermes

Original Poster:

227 posts

216 months

Sunday 1st June
quotequote all
Is 130 miles at an average speed of 60mph in winter possible without charging?

TIA

Paul Drawmer

5,037 posts

282 months

Sunday 1st June
quotequote all
Do you mean average speed of 60? In which case definitely not as you'd have to be driving pretty hard to do that.

However, if you mean using 60 as a target speed when the road is clear; then yes it will. I go from South of Banbury to Tamworth and back quite regularly. In winter, if I set the cruise at 60 on the M40, M42, A5 then it will just do the return trip of 140. It's on the limit for me though. Today, it would be easy.

2019 I3S 120aH 66,000 miles


GT6k

906 posts

177 months

Sunday 1st June
quotequote all
Assuming it's a 120Ah/42kWh battery then 140 miles at 70 mph is what I count on getting.

RotorRambler

257 posts

5 months

Sunday 1st June
quotequote all


“Even the newest i3 with the 120Ah battery realistically manages 100 120 miles in cold weather at motorway speeds. So 130 miles at a steady 60 mph in winter is:
At the very upper limit for the 120Ah model (and only with very efficient driving),
And not possible with the older 94Ah version without a recharge.

You might make it if:
You have the 120Ah i3 (2019+),
Weather is cold but not freezing, and
You drive efficiently (e.g. heat pump use, eco mode, no hard acceleration).

But it s risky if:
You have the older 94Ah version,
Temperatures are near or below freezing,
There s any headwind, elevation gain, or traffic,
You re using climate control liberally”

Big Nanas

2,481 posts

99 months

Sunday 1st June
quotequote all
Fair amount of missing info on your question, OP, but to give you my experience:
I had a '21 120ah i3s, and the absolute worst range I encountered was 110 miles, which was 4am on a November morning at -2c.

We travelled from Surrey to Moto Rugby services, which is 100 miles (95 of which are motorway). All of it was at the speed limit, using lights, AC and heated seats, with two people and a full boot of holiday gear.

OutInTheShed

11,313 posts

41 months

Sunday 1st June
quotequote all
What age of car, and how long into the future do you need this range?

Is there a margin built in to the question, or do you intend pushing things to the limit?

I don't like being on a motorway with less than 50 miles of spare diesel.
When the traffic gets bad, you never know if it's going to get worse.

IroningMan

10,528 posts

261 months

Sunday 1st June
quotequote all
hermes said:
Is 130 miles at an average speed of 60mph in winter possible without charging?

TIA
Yes. Dual carriageway/motorway with cruise set to 60mph.

Discombobulate

5,574 posts

201 months

Sunday 1st June
quotequote all
Yes.

Discombobulate

5,574 posts

201 months

Sunday 1st June
quotequote all
OutInTheShed said:
What age of car, and how long into the future do you need this range?

Is there a margin built in to the question, or do you intend pushing things to the limit?

I don't like being on a motorway with less than 50 miles of spare diesel.
When the traffic gets bad, you never know if it's going to get worse.
The worse the traffic the better for an EV typically (range wise)

SWoll

20,464 posts

273 months

Sunday 1st June
quotequote all
With UK winters usually involving a lot of rain I'd suggest no chance in my experience with a non S I3 120ah. Efficiency falls like a stone in had weather.

You certainly aren't going to manage it with any kind of safety buffer.

hermes

Original Poster:

227 posts

216 months

Sunday 1st June
quotequote all
My commute. Note time, and temp. Only me in the car so a large car serves no purpose.



One way. We have charge points at work.

OutInTheShed

11,313 posts

41 months

Sunday 1st June
quotequote all
Discombobulate said:
The worse the traffic the better for an EV typically (range wise)
Surely that's only true up to a point?
Slow is 'good' but stop/start accelerate/brake is 'bad', but not as 'bad' as with petrol?


gangzoom

7,336 posts

230 months

Sunday 1st June
quotequote all
GT6k said:
Assuming it's a 120Ah/42kWh battery then 140 miles at 70 mph is what I count on getting.
To get that you need to hit over 3.3miles per kWh assuming zero degradation. I thought at 70mph the i3 had higher consumption?

74merc

601 posts

207 months

Sunday 1st June
quotequote all
If you precondition the battery beforehand, I'd say it's possible. I've seen around 150 miles of range on the GOM, at temperatures not much above zero. You'd still want to be driving sympathetically though.

Funky Squirrel

434 posts

87 months

Sunday 1st June
quotequote all
Get one with a range extender and you will have no issues getting to where you need.

Paul Drawmer

5,037 posts

282 months

Sunday 1st June
quotequote all
hermes said:
My commute. Note time, and temp. Only me in the car so a large car serves no purpose.



One way. We have charge points at work.
Much as I'm an advocate for the I3S. It would be unlikely to do that run at that speed

ZesPak

25,483 posts

211 months

Monday 2nd June
quotequote all
OutInTheShed said:
Surely that's only true up to a point?
Slow is 'good' but stop/start accelerate/brake is 'bad', but not as 'bad' as with petrol?
It's a good question. Regenerative braking is a lot more efficient than you'd think though. It's along the lines of 70%.
When upping the speed, wind resistance goes mad basically. It's a simple question of aerodynamics vs regenerative braking.
Putting in some numbers on some napkin math, with two scenarios: one car driving 100km/h for an hour, the other one constantly going from 30 to 50, also doing 100km, the total consumption of the one going 100km/h is 60% higher by my math. Might be a bit optimistic with the regen scenario, but I'm very confident in saying (also by anecdotal experience) that driving in a traffic jam/city ups the range immensely.

OutInTheShed

11,313 posts

41 months

Tuesday 3rd June
quotequote all
ZesPak said:
OutInTheShed said:
Surely that's only true up to a point?
Slow is 'good' but stop/start accelerate/brake is 'bad', but not as 'bad' as with petrol?
It's a good question. Regenerative braking is a lot more efficient than you'd think though. It's along the lines of 70%.
When upping the speed, wind resistance goes mad basically. It's a simple question of aerodynamics vs regenerative braking.
Putting in some numbers on some napkin math, with two scenarios: one car driving 100km/h for an hour, the other one constantly going from 30 to 50, also doing 100km, the total consumption of the one going 100km/h is 60% higher by my math. Might be a bit optimistic with the regen scenario, but I'm very confident in saying (also by anecdotal experience) that driving in a traffic jam/city ups the range immensely.
The question was about doing 130 miles in a day. That's about 200km?
Nobody wants to be doing 30km/h if they've got 200km to do in a day.
stty motorway traffic is often oscillating between 40 and 60 mph or 60 to 100 km/h.

People report great range pottering around the suburbs. But motorway, winter, car well into its middle age, won't be so great.

There are other EVs to choose, which had much more range when new, which now have many more years ahead of them being able to do 130+ miles in a day. These alternatives will likely be a better solution in the long run?

In the real world, maybe if you like the i3, then it's an option if you've got the possibility to bail out and shove a bit of charge in when it gets marginal.
Trouble is, the i3 has its fans so is still expensive for the range it delivers. You can buy a newer Kona with range to spare for a few quid more , that will be cheaper in the long run. Plenty of people want to buy an i3 for 20 mile commute.

SWoll

20,464 posts

273 months

Tuesday 3rd June
quotequote all
OutInTheShed said:
The question was about doing 130 miles in a day. That's about 200km?
Nobody wants to be doing 30km/h if they've got 200km to do in a day.
stty motorway traffic is often oscillating between 40 and 60 mph or 60 to 100 km/h.

People report great range pottering around the suburbs. But motorway, winter, car well into its middle age, won't be so great.

There are other EVs to choose, which had much more range when new, which now have many more years ahead of them being able to do 130+ miles in a day. These alternatives will likely be a better solution in the long run?

In the real world, maybe if you like the i3, then it's an option if you've got the possibility to bail out and shove a bit of charge in when it gets marginal.
Trouble is, the i3 has its fans so is still expensive for the range it delivers. You can buy a newer Kona with range to spare for a few quid more , that will be cheaper in the long run. Plenty of people want to buy an i3 for 20 mile commute.
100% agree with this. They're a great city car and for the odd longer trip but wouldn't be my first choice for regular high speed drives as the efficiency drops considerably and not the most stable of cars thanks to their shape, short wheelbase and relatively narrow tyres.

The reality is your be much better off with a Kona, Corsa E, Zoe etc. With 50kWh batteries if looking for a comfortable 150 miles (including 10% buffer) all year round.

Discombobulate

5,574 posts

201 months

Tuesday 3rd June
quotequote all
OutInTheShed said:
Surely that's only true up to a point?
Slow is 'good' but stop/start accelerate/brake is 'bad', but not as 'bad' as with petrol?
Indeed, only true up to a point.