N. Korean Ship launch gone wrong

N. Korean Ship launch gone wrong

Author
Discussion

Decky_Q

Original Poster:

1,783 posts

190 months

I've been looking at the satellite images of the Destroyer launch. To me it looks like the bow section didnt release properly, the stern slid into the water deeper than expected as a result of the pivoting, bottomed out puncturing the hull, and falling over.

Anyone else have any theories? Agree or disagree?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx279v4z9lzo

Wacky Racer

39,654 posts

260 months

Some people (and their families) are going to be having some sleepless nights.

Blib

45,798 posts

210 months

Wacky Racer said:
Some people (and their families) are going to be having some sleepless nights.
Sleepless: as in 'dead'.

EmailAddress

14,367 posts

231 months

Seals Black Team.

CoolHands

20,526 posts

208 months

I wonder where you find that much blue tarpaulin. Can’t be easy.

hidetheelephants

29,711 posts

206 months

Sideways launching is sketchy at the best of times, certainly more prone to incident than lengthwise launching; both are fraught with fk-up potential which is why many shipyards don't do dynamic launches any more. It's probably fit for bean tins and razorblades, but given the ste that the NKs have in their navy it may well be patched up and used for something just to save face.

Condi

18,636 posts

184 months

Depending how much fitting out they had done - probably not a lot - it could well just be a case of refloating, drying out, repairing any holes and continuing with the program. I would doubt if it's damaged much terminally.

ChocolateFrog

31,140 posts

186 months

Sounds like the scapegoats have already been lined up for the firing squad.


fooman

260 posts

77 months

CoolHands said:
I wonder where you find that much blue tarpaulin. Can’t be easy.
Looked like the curtains from one of Kims palaces to me.

hidetheelephants

29,711 posts

206 months

Condi said:
Depending how much fitting out they had done - probably not a lot - it could well just be a case of refloating, drying out, repairing any holes and continuing with the program. I would doubt if it's damaged much terminally.
It will have a keel shaped like a dog's hind leg, as long as they don't mind it going sideways it'll be reet.

CoolHands

20,526 posts

208 months

fooman said:
CoolHands said:
I wonder where you find that much blue tarpaulin. Can’t be easy.
Looked like the curtains from one of Kims palaces to me.
biggrin you just made me think, his suits are pretty big… maybe this is a bit of spare material from his tailor

thewarlock

3,271 posts

58 months

hidetheelephants said:
Condi said:
Depending how much fitting out they had done - probably not a lot - it could well just be a case of refloating, drying out, repairing any holes and continuing with the program. I would doubt if it's damaged much terminally.
It will have a keel shaped like a dog's hind leg, as long as they don't mind it going sideways it'll be reet.
Probably not.

Depends I guess, at that stage of build it was probably displacing somewhere between 1/2 and 2/3rds of her design deep end of life displacement.

If it was designed to some sensible sort of ruleset (LR, DNV, BV, ABS), which it probably wasn't, but some sort of sensible equivalent sort of design combined still water and wave bending moment for a warship, the hull girder will be pretty damn stiff and strong.

Yes, they've dropped it on its side, but unless they've managed to buckle all the internal decks, it'll probably still be pretty straight.

It'll certainly need some remedial work, but i doubt it's going to be scrap as a result of this.