RE: Dodge launches 'world's only four-door muscle car'

RE: Dodge launches 'world's only four-door muscle car'

Thursday 22nd May

Dodge launches 'world's only four-door muscle car'

The new 670hp Dodge Charger Daytona Sedan has arrived. Although there's a good reason to hold your horses...


It’s been more than a year since Dodge revealed its all-electric Charger. Its maker decreed it ‘the world’s first and only electric muscle car’ at the time - a declaration that remains true now (assuming you’re willing to dismiss the idea that any other absurdly powerful EV has no credible claim to the narrow concept of ‘muscle’). And now, thanks to the all-new 2026 Dodge Charger Daytona Sedan, the brand has another one to hand: the world’s only four-door muscle car. 

In many ways, of course, this is even more dubious. Fast four doors abound in the battery-powered world; Mercedes-AMG is on the cusp of launching one with more than 1,000hp; the Porsche Taycan Turbo GT we drove this week already produces that much (occasionally). And that’s before we get to whatever the electrified replacement for the BMW M3 looks and sounds like. But we digress. If the monopoly on muscle cars means being American, then the saloon version of the Charger - a model underpinned by seven previous generations - is richly deserving of the description. 

Or as much as any car can be without the presence of a large petrol engine. Like the two-door Charger before it, the Daytona sedan makes up for that with large numbers. Even more so in fact, because it seems all versions will now feature the previously optional Scat Pack, which unlocks 670hp and 627lb ft of torque from the factory. And thanks to standard all-wheel drive (courtesy of dual electric motors) that means 0-60mph in 3.3 seconds - or, as Dodge prefers to measure it, ‘Hellcat Redeye levels of performance’. 

Much else is the same, too. You still get the ‘fratzonic chambered exhaust’ (patent pending), a full suite of drive modes, 20-inch wheels with staggered tyre sizes (325-section at the rear), a mechanical limited-slip rear diff, and up to 241 miles of range courtesy of a 100.5kWh battery. And you absolutely get the same look because Dodge has gone out of its way to migrate the Charger’s exterior styling to the sedan. The models share a common roofline and liftgate, and there is no difference whatsoever in the design of the front or rear - just more doors on the flanks. 

“The beauty is in the simplicity,” said Matt McAlear, Dodge CEO. “It’s a real testament to the Dodge design and engineering teams that apart from two additional doors, the Dodge Charger Daytona sedan embodies the same look and feel as the coupe, with the same widebody exterior, driver-centric interior, muscle car performance, and standard all-wheel-drive capability, combined with four-door practicality.”

While it is clearly easier to access, Dodge reiterates - much as it did for the two-door - that the Charger offers the best in class cargo and passenger space (though what exactly it includes in that ‘class’ isn’t clear). At any rate, it’s the least you would expect from a model that apparently boasts 'the widest body of any car in the industry'. In fact, its maker suggests that one of the objectives of fitting rear doors was to help accentuate the ‘powerful presence’ of the current Charger - an attribute it likely needs help with given the conspicuous absence of gargling thunder. 

Happily, it will not remain that way for long. The 2026 Charger lineup is all about giving our customers the power to choose the muscle car that best fits their lifestyle, with even more choices to come later this year with gas-powered SIXPACK Charger models,” McAlear confirmed. This version, powered by a 550hp derivative of the new twin-turbocharged 3.0-litre Hurricane straight-six, was promised for Q1 of 2025 when Dodge originally launched the EV - evidently, that target date has slipped to the second half of the year. You’d imagine there are plenty of buyers who consider a muscle car fuelled by petrol well worth the wait. 


Author
Discussion

oilit

Original Poster:

2,713 posts

191 months

Thursday
quotequote all
I suspect the ev version of this will have close to zero sales, and everyone is waiting for the petrol/gas version

PSB1967

338 posts

169 months

Thursday
quotequote all
For me, Muscle car's are big engine guzzlers that can't go round a corner (In this case a battery guzzler as 240miles for 100kW/h battery is appalling). European stuff will never qualify due to handling prowess.

Johnspex

4,664 posts

197 months

Thursday
quotequote all
A nice simple clean- lined handsome car

Andy86GT

608 posts

78 months

Thursday
quotequote all
I would think the i4 M50 qualifies as a 'muscle car' unless it has to American.
Anyway, there were rumours that Dodge were re-considering putting a V8 in again post Trump.

rider73

3,936 posts

90 months

Thursday
quotequote all
I really like the car, all the bs around it, not so much.....

robemcdonald

9,387 posts

209 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Got to love the Americans.

“Hey we just built a four door muscle car no one else in the US does that”

“That means it’s the first in the world”

Pretty sure Brabus have been knocking them out for several decades.

Rat_Fink_67

2,632 posts

219 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Essentially all just marketing BS.

The original muscle car recipe was to take the engine and drivetrain from the "full-sized" passenger car from whichever particular manufacturer of origin it was, add some fancier carbs or a bigger cam, then install it in the compact/mid-sized two-door cooking model.

It's a big, powerful saloon, but it's not a muscle car.

Lil_Red_GTO

754 posts

156 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Handsome car. Can't think of a better looking EV.

ducnick

2,021 posts

256 months

Thursday
quotequote all
One other defining of muscle cars & pony cars is that they must be American and hence cheaply made junk sold at a lower price than premium cars with similar performance.
An AMG Merc c63 delivers of the power and putting the engine from the big car into the smaller body criteria. It may even deliver of the poor build quality criteria. However the Merc fails to be American or cheap.

Jon_S_Rally

3,906 posts

101 months

Thursday
quotequote all
I actually think the four-door looks better than the two-door. It seems to hide the additional body height in a way that the two-door doesn't.

It's a shame they dropped the V8 for this generation, especially as Ford still offer one in the Mustang, but at least they are doing an ICE version for those that want it.

The Pistonsdead

5,080 posts

220 months

Thursday
quotequote all
That's a fine looking thing.

Wills2

25,661 posts

188 months

Thursday
quotequote all

The entry point Daytona R/T has been a sales flop and has been dropped for the MY26 to be replaced by this one, thousands are sat on lots unsold, I just think that whilst the move to EV suits some cars and improves them for some form factors is just doesn't work where the engine and drama were the main selling selling point.


vladcjelli

3,198 posts

171 months

Thursday
quotequote all
The Pistonsdead said:
That's a fine looking thing.
Seconded.

Would have one.*

.* - price and local availability dependent.

Huzzah

27,943 posts

196 months

Thursday
quotequote all
vladcjelli said:
The Pistonsdead said:
That's a fine looking thing.
Seconded.

Would have one.*

.* - price and local availability dependent.
Me too, stealthy.

Rat_Fink_67

2,632 posts

219 months

Thursday
quotequote all
ducnick said:
An AMG Merc c63 delivers of the power and putting the engine from the big car into the smaller body criteria.
Not anymore it doesn't.

British Beef

2,477 posts

178 months

Thursday
quotequote all

I score the variants of this car as follows:

5 stars - if fitted with supercharged V8 with 600+ hp

4 stars - If fitted v6 or v8 with manual >400hp

3 stars - ICE <350 hp

2 stars - Electric powered

Fetchez la vache

5,740 posts

227 months

Thursday
quotequote all
If they describe it as the world's only four-door muscle car, and also best in class cargo and passenger space then surely it's the only car in that class, and so also the worst in its class?

Anyhoo, to sum up, like others have said, dislike the marketting BS but it's a fine looking thing.

Terminator X

17,428 posts

217 months

Thursday
quotequote all
oilit said:
I suspect the ev version of this will have close to zero sales, and everyone is waiting for the petrol/gas version
Same. Bit like the C63, its USP is the engine.

TX.

RazerSauber

2,714 posts

73 months

Thursday
quotequote all
I love Dodge Chargers and Challengers and it guts me that I look at this and think it's as ugly as sin. Real shame in my eyes. Oh well, another reason not to buy one.

Wheel Turned Out

1,360 posts

51 months

Thursday
quotequote all
I love the looks of it. Derivative and predictable as it may be though, I feel it needs a V8.

It would have to be something special (or fantastically cheap) to be a preference over a Blackwing, that can have both a V8 and a manual.