RE: 2025 Audi RS3 vs. VW Golf R Black Edition

RE: 2025 Audi RS3 vs. VW Golf R Black Edition

Saturday 12th April

2025 Audi RS3 vs. VW Golf R Black Edition

The latest RS3 is more powerful, faster and much pricier than a Mk8.5 Golf R - is it worth the extra?


Is it controversial to call the recently revised Audi RS3 and Mk8.5 VW Golf R the best of their respective breeds? There’s been a fast and four-wheel-drive Golf for more than 20 years now, and an RS3 for almost a decade and a half. Yet for the first time, VW is now offering an R with a standard torque vectoring rear diff (that used to be a four-figure option), while Audi has made this RS3 more than seven seconds faster around the Nordschleife than its predecessor - with no more power. Some far flung corner of the internet must have exploded with the news that an RS3 was having its chassis methodically overhauled - damper tweaks, software upgrades, some brake biting to help turn in - to the benefit of lap times. 

To a few, a fast Audi A3 is probably still about nothing more than warble and understeer, and there are likely still jokes going around about cheap Golf R leases. But in case anyone needed reminding, a lot has changed in the past decade, and with the end surely nigh for both R and RS in their current, exclusively petrol-powered guises it’s nice to see worthwhile hardware improvements for both. This begs the obvious question - can the Audi justify its price premium with a legendary engine and swankier cabin? Or is a Golf R really all the all-wheel-drive hatch you’ll need?

If there is debate about either model being at its generational peak, the source of the controversy is located inside. Both Golf and RS3 are tangibly less nice places to spend time day-to-day than their predecessors from half a dozen years ago, and there remains no escaping that unfortunately. Scratchy plastics abound in the Golf, from seat lever to window switches, while the Audi’s gear selector and start button would grate in the seaside amusements. While both boast decent driving positions and reasonably responsive touch screens, neither feels exactly worth the price being asked for them. Which is quite the hurdle to overcome. The Audi is better, clearly, with some nicer leather and two useful rows of buttons, though it still requires improvement. A customer who had come into either from, say, a new M135, would be sorely disappointed. And the BMW costs less.

Fortunately for both, interior design doesn’t dictate verdict on PH, and it’s safe to say both are a more satisfying steer than the curiously plain BMW. Neither does exterior styling, for that matter, although it feels worth saying that to these eyes the VW reclaims some ground on that score. Even in white. Though both should convey some intent and attitude as the flagships of their ranges, the Audi just seems like it’s trying a bit too hard - from the rear especially. And whoever signed off the wheel design shouldn’t be allowed to again. Whatever happened to sleekly handsome Audi hatchbacks?

Handily both RS3 and Golf R are very good at shuffling those reservations to the back of your mind when driving. There’s never been a Golf R as eager to please as this one. It’s alert, exciting and poised, always willing for the rear axle to dictate cornering attitude in a way that still seems a little strange in a Golf. It’s wickedly fast, stops harder than it’ll ever need to, and typically shrugs off the worst a road can throw at it. There remains little beating a Golf R for maximum speed and minimum effort, with the torque vectoring on hand to ensure it’s no longer such a one-dimensional driving experience. 

By comparison, the RS3 is initially more subdued, like a GT rather than a grown-up GTI. There’s a little more float at the front end as the damping must contain a good deal more engine, less sound from everywhere and a bit more lag before it wakes up and gets going. But dismiss it as your peril, because this is an even better RS3 than the already very impressive previous gen. Like the Golf, the rear axle feels a little more refined in the way it divvies power across the wheels, so the driver can be more confident in getting on the throttle. Audi’s ‘RS Torque Rear’, if hardly romantic, yet feels a more appropriate name for the setting than ‘Drift’ mode in the Golf; it lends the car a more rearward bias, which works nicely with the keener front end. The Audi puts all the tools at your disposal to get stuck in and discover its talents. Which are considerable.

Where once Dynamic would have been avoided because of cloying steering weight and a concrete injection to the dampers, here it’s the best setting - along with the model-specific RS Performance setting - for really showing off what the Audi is capable of. There’s always more bite, more grip, more composure - not to mention the encouragement to try just that bit harder. All aided, it should be said, by usefully compact dimensions - admirably, the RS3 hasn’t ballooned over the years. It’s probably quicker down a B road than an RS6 as a result. And more fun. 

That the Golf can still feel exciting back-to-back is encouraging. Its weight advantage means it always hints at a tad more agility and just a tiny bit less inertia, which it’s hard not to indulge. While it still can’t deliver the fidelity and tactile joy of a Civic Type R, there’s always mischief to be had. A brilliant distraction from its less-than-stellar attributes; where once a great Golf interior meant an ordinary driving experience could be overlooked, now the roles have been reversed somewhat. 

It’s a shame then that the four-cylinder motor can’t be a little more interesting, and of course no comparison is going to highlight the character deficit like this one. Even a pricey Akrapovic exhaust and the new manual gearbox mode (eliminating kickdown and auto upchanges) can’t hide the fact that, if effective, the venerable EA888 remains no great thriller. Similarly, all the filters and smothering in the world can’t hide the star quality of the 2.5-litre inline-five; you could drive this car with ear plugs in and it’s still the more satisfying unit, that great swell of torque (almost 20 per cent more) morphing into a rampant rush for the limiter in every single gear. Add that old-school, big-hearted character to the unmistakable, unforgettable sound and engines are the biggest point of difference between the two. The Audi is charming at all speeds, whereas the VW unit doesn’t linger long in the memory however it’s driven. Both deserve better gearboxes, another area where rivals like BMW and Mercedes probably edge ahead again. Responses can be slow, and the paddles aren’t nice to use. 

Nevertheless, as reminders of what can be achieved with a turbocharged engine and four driven wheels in five-door hatchbacks, the latest RS3 and the Golf R still offer up a huge amount. There’s not a situation or weather condition they don’t suit, as adept on the motorway as on the B road, ready for a tip run or a track day, the crawling commuters or late-night blasters. Previous versions were always close to this kind of all-court ability, but both have added a depth of chassis talent that simply wasn't there not so long ago. This means there's so much more to discover during the course of ownership. Or the duration of the lease, perhaps. 

Which brings us to the thorny question of cost. Because for all the RS3's perceived advantages (the interior quality and the engine, mainly), there’s most certainly a premium attached: even a regular RS3 is now £61,785. A Golf R starts at £45,785, or £46,910 in top-of-the-range Black Edition; a Carbon Vorsprung RS3 is now a £70k prospect before thinking about a funky paint colour. With Audi’s higher typical APR right now also, a customer would be paying thousands more on a deposit, more each month, and face a final payment of 50 per cent extra if comparing a Golf like this one with a standard RS3. 

Ultimately, that extra outlay buys you the better car, as you'd hope it would - and as the wider VW Group intended. It gives up precious little, if anything, to the Golf as a driving experience, and even if you do prefer the VW tune of some components, this is offset by the singular personality of its powerplant and a less irksome interior. Nevertheless, it’s £17,000 more expensive in this comparison, against a car which is almost its performance rival in real life, and sometimes more fun on a twisty road. The Mk8.5 continues to be hamstrung by its frustrating shortcomings, yet its moral victory here is almost beyond question: as it typically does, the Golf R represents good value for the money. But if you're looking for a hot hatch to invest in and enjoy long-term, while the world electrifies around it, the RS3 is it. 


SPECIFICATION | 2025 VW GOLF R (MK8.5)

Engine: 1,984cc, turbocharged, four-cylinder
Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch auto, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 333@5,600-6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 310@2,100-5,500rpm
0-62mph: 4.6sec
Top speed: 155mph (168mph optional)
Weight: 1,548kg (VW ‘unladen weight’)
MPG: 34.5 (WLTP)
CO2: 186g/km (WLTP)
Price: £45,785 (price as standard; price as tested £52,580 comprising Area view for £335, Adaptive chassis control (DCC) – including driving profile selection for £735, Panoramic sunroof – tilting and sliding for £1,250, R Performance ‘Akrapovic’ exhaust system for £3,395, Carbon decorative inserts – dashboard and front door trim for £810, Vodafone SCD60 S5 Thatcham Tracker – including 6 month subscription for £270 incl. fitting)

SPECIFICATION | 2025 AUDI RS3 SPORTBACK CARBON VORSPRUNG

Engine: 2,490cc, five-cylinder, turbo
Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch auto, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 400@5,600-7,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 369@2,250-5,600rpm
0-62mph: 3.8 seconds
Top speed: 155mph (174mph with Carbon Vorsprung pack)
Weight: 1,640kg
MPG: 30.4
CO2: 211g/km
Price: £68,680 (as standard; price as tested £69,575, comprising Ascari Blue paint for £895)

Author
Discussion

Benzinaio

Original Poster:

254 posts

14 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
23K For a cylinder.
And still worth it.......

big_rob_sydney

3,582 posts

206 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
The Audi reminds me of a modern Subaru with the focus on the exhaust sounds. Warble? Yeah, okay.

That said, I dont want a bar of either of them. This firm (VAG) is in serious financial debt - around 200 BILLION. It is the second most indebted company in the world, behind only Toyota, at around 205 BILLION. There is every chance that VAG will cease to exist before too long in its current form. If that were to happen, what would that do to the value of orphan vehicles, and parts supply?

Added to the internal issues, there are plenty of external issues to consider. German union behaviour. EU laws. Competition from, in particular, Chinese EV companies. Are people aware that the previous huge profits made in the domestic Chinese market have all but disappeared for European ICE manufacturers? The Chinese passenger vehicle market is bigger than Europe and America COMBINED. If they cant obtain profits there, then they will be essentially sunk, given the huge debt loads they carry.

I wouldnt touch a German or British car with a barge pole for now, given the direction the worlds vehicles are heading (EV). There are zero competitive EV's from any German or British brand today, and the only thing remotely keeping those nations manufacturers in business are tariffs that artificially force up prices, meaning consumers have to pay more, for domestic products that are unable to compete.

whp1983

1,252 posts

151 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
Never understood why RS3 and Golf R always got tested together….. Golf R and S3 are near enough same car and that’s the closer call.
RS3 is different thing in terms of cost, engine etc

Like putting R against A45 instead of A35 etc….. not quite a comparable

Portofino

4,665 posts

203 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
big_rob_sydney said:
The Audi reminds me of a modern Subaru with the focus on the exhaust sounds. Warble? Yeah, okay.

That said, I dont want a bar of either of them. This firm (VAG) is in serious financial debt - around 200 BILLION. It is the second most indebted company in the world, behind only Toyota, at around 205 BILLION. There is every chance that VAG will cease to exist before too long in its current form. If that were to happen, what would that do to the value of orphan vehicles, and parts supply?

Added to the internal issues, there are plenty of external issues to consider. German union behaviour. EU laws. Competition from, in particular, Chinese EV companies. Are people aware that the previous huge profits made in the domestic Chinese market have all but disappeared for European ICE manufacturers? The Chinese passenger vehicle market is bigger than Europe and America COMBINED. If they cant obtain profits there, then they will be essentially sunk, given the huge debt loads they carry.

I wouldnt touch a German or British car with a barge pole for now, given the direction the worlds vehicles are heading (EV). There are zero competitive EV's from any German or British brand today, and the only thing remotely keeping those nations manufacturers in business are tariffs that artificially force up prices, meaning consumers have to pay more, for domestic products that are unable to compete.
So I take it you don’t like the dash in the Golf?

Dombilano

1,290 posts

67 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
big_rob_sydney said:
The Audi reminds me of a modern Subaru with the focus on the exhaust sounds. Warble? Yeah, okay.

That said, I dont want a bar of either of them. This firm (VAG) is in serious financial debt - around 200 BILLION. It is the second most indebted company in the world, behind only Toyota, at around 205 BILLION. There is every chance that VAG will cease to exist before too long in its current form. If that were to happen, what would that do to the value of orphan vehicles, and parts supply?

Added to the internal issues, there are plenty of external issues to consider. German union behaviour. EU laws. Competition from, in particular, Chinese EV companies. Are people aware that the previous huge profits made in the domestic Chinese market have all but disappeared for European ICE manufacturers? The Chinese passenger vehicle market is bigger than Europe and America COMBINED. If they cant obtain profits there, then they will be essentially sunk, given the huge debt loads they carry.

I wouldnt touch a German or British car with a barge pole for now, given the direction the worlds vehicles are heading (EV). There are zero competitive EV's from any German or British brand today, and the only thing remotely keeping those nations manufacturers in business are tariffs that artificially force up prices, meaning consumers have to pay more, for domestic products that are unable to compete.
Err, are you ok? Do you understand how corporate debt works?
Ford, Mercedes, BMW, all 100bn+ in debt. Are they going pop anytime soon?

fullleather

263 posts

133 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
The Audi alloys look ok, diamond turned and perhaps look a tad delicate. Those on the golf, you can’t really see the damn things….these black wheels always remind me of the Nike air max (in black) local scrote gangs hanging around the likes of McDonalds…

GreatScott2016

1,746 posts

100 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
Matts not a fan of the new Audi wheels then? I have to agree with him here. They just don't suit the flagship RS, perhaps they'd work better on a lesser model.

TonyF1

197 posts

64 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
Weird to compare these back to back. For most the buying decision would be RS vs S.

Mark Turmell

615 posts

24 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
‘Big Rob’ has spoken and we shall all heed his wise words.

Anyway, back in the real world, I’d take the Golf, the RS3 is way too shouty.

yme402

506 posts

114 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
Try and find a nice low mileage Golf MK7 GTI.
This had all the power and performance you would ever need, and was way beyond both of these cars in terms of quality, character and desirability.

scenario8

7,013 posts

191 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
Well Rob’s correct that VAG is in the doo-doo and along with many European legacy manufacturers has a very uncertain medium and long term future but that in itself is unlikely to dissuade many potential UK punters looking to finance themselves one way or another into a shiney European branded “premium” ICE hatchback for a few years yet.

In white with black wheels the Golf just doesn’t “look” premium to me. If I was finding £50,000 or an amortised £700 odd a month I’d be a bit underwhelmed. Horses for courses, though. Whatever floats your boat.

Edited to ask, has the hateful software in the infotainment been properly sorted on these? I drive a related model built last year and for those of us who spend a lot of time in the car and for whom avoiding using the infotainment screen isn’t as easy as others who might rarely touch the screen the interface is really quite hateful.

The ADAS drives you up the wall, too. At least is does for me in urban/suburban use.

Edited by scenario8 on Saturday 12th April 08:31

SDK

1,522 posts

265 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
£70k, plus £3.3k for the first year VED tax for the Audi, plus fuel costs eek

I would just take a Hyundai 5N for £65k, which is quicker and if tracks are you thing likely more fun too. Plus you can get unlimited home charging for £20 a month.

GreatScott2016

1,746 posts

100 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
SDK said:
£70k, plus £3.3k for the first year VED tax for the Audi, plus fuel costs eek

I would just take a Hyundai 5N for £65k, which is quicker and if tracks are you thing likely more fun too. Plus you can get unlimited home charging for £20 a month.
Unless I’m mistaken, the Golf R is in the same tax bracket, as is the 2025 GRY. All very scary though smile



CoolHands

20,326 posts

207 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
Are all these new cars £3.3k road tax? And stay high for the first 5 years?

The Audi dash area / console etc look nice, the golf horrible and cheap

SDK

1,522 posts

265 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
Are all these new cars £3.3k road tax? And stay high for the first 5 years?
First year VED rates depend on the CO2 output.
The highest category for cars emitting over 255g CO2/KM is £5,490, e.g. Ford Mustang V8

After the first year the cost is a standard £195
Then you have the expensive car supplement which for cars over £40k, is £410 per year for the first 5 years,

Alorotom

12,303 posts

199 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
The Audi dash area / console etc look nice, the golf horrible and cheap
My opinion is the direct opposite ... I really want to love the latest audi interiors (as a big audi fanboi with 2 sat on my drive as we speak, and neither are black/white/grey or on PCP) but I just really dislike the look and feel of them - and the little squared steering wheel, not a fan.

I would have to take the Golf out of the 2 ...

In reality though, probably neither - 2 neighbours had their RS3 and Golf Rs liberated from their driveways a couple of years ago and thats enough to stop me being a buyer.

Firebobby

771 posts

51 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
Both Toyota and VW are still well within what would be termed acceptable corporate debt. If you're gonna "Google" a few figures and post the results then at least look at the whole picture!

AmyRichardson

1,659 posts

54 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
TonyF1 said:
Weird to compare these back to back. For most the buying decision would be RS vs S.
It's a stock auto journalism structure; "there's a very fast, capable mid-ranger and a somewhat faster and more able range-topper; is the massive bump in price worth it." Think 340i (w/few £k at Bird's) vs Alpina vs M3 (because that was a thing!)

In this case we're looking at cars that are both numb from a tactile perspective and fast/capable beyond the wits and reactions of 99% of buyers; so we're talking £20k for a pot, 70hp and a different (better/worse - opinions may differ) interior.

Johnson897210

554 posts

5 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
70 grand for a fecking A3 I mean what the actual fk that’s ridiculous. By that logic 45k for a Golf looks good value!

Terminator X

17,163 posts

216 months

Saturday 12th April
quotequote all
Audi have lost their way as the R shouldn't even be a competitor.

TX.