RE: Caterham confirms all-new engine for latest Seven

RE: Caterham confirms all-new engine for latest Seven

Wednesday 9th April

Caterham confirms all-new engine for latest Seven

The Academy cars will get a 1.3 turbo from next season - expect a dedicated road model to follow


It was all the way back in September 2021 that Caterham confirmed the 1.6-litre, Ford Sigma-engined models - the Super 1600, 270, and 310 - would no longer be produced. The core Sevens, basically, making acquisition of a replacement engine a real priority. Now we know (or can make a very good guess, at least) at what that motor will be, because from next season the Caterham Academy cars - also Sigma-powered since 2008 - will use a new 1.3-litre four-cylinder turbo instead. 

Specifically, it’ll be the HR13 engine, a unit made by Horse Technologies (the recently announced collab of Renault, Geely, and Aramco). The powertrain was introduced earlier this year, though surely can’t be dissimilar to the old HR13DDT seen in Meganes, A-Classes, and Qashqais, to be built in Brazil primarily for the South American market and with up to 163hp possible. For the Academy Caterhams, we’re told to expect around 130hp and 130lb ft, so not drastically different outputs to the old Sigma racers, though almost certainly with a different character thanks to the forced induction. A gearbox hasn’t been confirmed yet.

Caterham CEO Bob Laishley said: “The Caterham Academy has successfully introduced more than 1,400 rookie racing drivers to motorsport in the UK over the last 30 years. We’re very pleased to confirm our new partnership with Horse Technologies and look forward to working with their team on the introduction of this new turbo engine to our competitive rookie series from next season.” Aside from the engine swap, the Academy will remain the same (very appealing) proposition that it always has, guiding you through the first steps of motorsport with one of the world’s best driver’s cars thrown into the deal. A price hasn’t been confirmed for 2026 that we can see, though expect it to be in the range of this year’s £45k. 

As for the future of Horse Technologies engines in Caterham road cars, it would seem like only a matter of time before a new line-up with the HR13 is announced. Not least because the Academy cars were always road legal anyway (and an absolute blast to take to and from races), so you’d have to assume that will continue with the new turbo and it complies with all the required regs over here. The fact it can produce more than 160hp potentially covers a more powerful model, while a related HR10 1.0-litre could take the place of the Suzuki triples should the time come. Let’s see. For now, what an exciting season of Academy 2026 looks set to be.


Author
Discussion

mooseracer

Original Poster:

2,286 posts

182 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
I know it is the world we live in, but turbo powered 7 is wrong.

ChevronB19

7,151 posts

175 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
mooseracer said:
I know it is the world we live in, but turbo powered 7 is wrong.
Agree.

RacerMike

4,480 posts

223 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
ChevronB19 said:
mooseracer said:
I know it is the world we live in, but turbo powered 7 is wrong.
Agree.
Whilst I understand where you're coming from, this will have an absolutely tiny turbo and with modern mapping/boost control I can't imagine it will feel vastly different to an NA.

GeniusOfLove

3,049 posts

24 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
If ever a car didn't want the compromises a turbo brings in throttle response and predictability it's a 7.

Mafioso

2,375 posts

226 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
All these comments about a turbo in a 7 when the Suzuki turbo already exists! Apart from mixed reviews of the drivetrain I don't believe the turbo is an issue. If they can bring a zingy 160hp version to the road market with the MX5 gearbox I reckon this would be a winner. Afterall F1 engines are turbocharged...

RacerMike

4,480 posts

223 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
Mafioso said:
All these comments about a turbo in a 7 when the Suzuki turbo already exists! Apart from mixed reviews of the drivetrain I don't believe the turbo is an issue. If they can bring a zingy 160hp version to the road market with the MX5 gearbox I reckon this would be a winner. Afterall F1 engines are turbocharged...
I had a 1.0 ecoboost Fiesta with 125hp a couple of years ago and honestly it felt like the least turbocharged car I’ve driven in years. Super linear power band with all the power s the top end. The turbo looked like a water pump and had a tiny injection moulded air manifold on it.

insideline

140 posts

236 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
I have a Sigma 140ps engined Caterham as well as a Puma ST 1.5triple 200ps, both engines feel remarkably similar in character. I’ve often wondered how easy it would be to put that unit in a Caterham as surely it’s lightweight and very tuneable. I suspect it’s too tall though to fit straight in.

This new engine sounds very promising and should mean a promising future for lower powered sevens.

VixenExige

33 posts

28 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
Mafioso said:
All these comments about a turbo in a 7 when the Suzuki turbo already exists! Apart from mixed reviews of the drivetrain I don't believe the turbo is an issue. If they can bring a zingy 160hp version to the road market with the MX5 gearbox I reckon this would be a winner. Afterall F1 engines are turbocharged...
Yes turbocharged, but also with a hybrid system which fills in the gaps. The moment the hybrid deployment is out of sync they're on the radio to the pit wall trying to troubleshoot it & change settings on the wheel to make the throttle linear/predictable again...

cerb4.5lee

35,784 posts

192 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
I'm just happy that you can still buy a Caterham with an engine in it to be honest, turbo or not. Really enjoyable to drive and light cars are on a downward slope generally nowadays I think. So this is still a big positive for me. driving




Hustle_

25,433 posts

172 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
Powered by horse technologies

framerateuk

2,796 posts

196 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
Is these are anything like the recent Renault/Nissan range, I'm sure they'd be a great match to be honest.

I had the 1.6T in my Clio 220 Trophy and we've got a 1.2 in the Duster.

They've got very linear power delivery, and don't dump that much torque low down.

The Sigma already feels torquey in a Caterham as it is, but then anything does with such little weight. I'm sure Caterham could tune a decent response from them.

Lotobear

7,682 posts

140 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
A 1.4 K series supersport, with the 6 speed Caterham box, will always be the sweet spot for me.

RacerMike

4,480 posts

223 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
framerateuk said:
The Sigma already feels torquey in a Caterham as it is, but then anything does with such little weight. I'm sure Caterham could tune a decent response from them.
The quoted torque figure for this engine is also only 10lbft more than the sigma, so I imagine it’ll be a very similar character.

The Pistonsdead

4,950 posts

219 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
Hustle_ said:
Powered by horse technologies
wink

cerb4.5lee

35,784 posts

192 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
Lotobear said:
A 1.4 K series supersport, with the 6 speed Caterham box, will always be the sweet spot for me.
I'm almost there with my 5 speed 1.8 K Series Supersport! biggrin

I do always read great things about the 6 speed box and the 1.4 version though for sure. thumbup

kambites

69,000 posts

233 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
GeniusOfLove said:
If ever a car didn't want the compromises a turbo brings in throttle response and predictability it's a 7.
yes Turbos are great for two-tonne barges and 1500kg FWD "point and squirt" hatches but it's utterly the wrong sort of engine for this sort of car IMO. A Seven needs deent throttle response and a flat torque curve all the way to the redline.

Hustle_

25,433 posts

172 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
Lotobear said:
A 1.4 K series supersport, with the 6 speed Caterham box, will always be the sweet spot for me.
I have had two Caterhams before and this is the one I want

RacerMike

4,480 posts

223 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
kambites said:
GeniusOfLove said:
If ever a car didn't want the compromises a turbo brings in throttle response and predictability it's a 7.
yes Turbos are great for two-tonne barges and 1500kg FWD "point and squirt" hatches but it's utterly the wrong sort of engine for this sort of car IMO. A Seven needs deent throttle response and a flat torque curve all the way to the redline.
Any engine has great throttle response when it weighs 550kg. I strongly suspect it’ll feel almost no different to the sigma which, as I’ve said, wasn’t exactly the worlds most characterful NA

Mr MXT

7,727 posts

295 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
Hustle_ said:
Powered by horse technologies
You can really feel it when you have a horse inside you!

philrs03

178 posts

108 months

Wednesday 9th April
quotequote all
On the fence about this. That decision wouldn’t have come lightly so I have faith in the development team at Caterham to have made the right call. That said (I have a 310R currently), an aggressive N/A 1600 with throttle bodies is one of, in my opinion, the greatest motoring experiences currently available. I’ll be racing in the academy next year, so I’ll reserve judgment until then!