GCHQ list of staff names compromised

GCHQ list of staff names compromised

Author
Discussion

768

Original Poster:

16,651 posts

111 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
By intern Hasaan Arshad, who took his phone into the building and connected it to a TS network and was able to walk out with data including staff names on his phone. A man who'd discussed financial rewards for leaking data.

https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/01/student_gch...

And they found child porn.

Those internships went well then.


turbobloke

111,865 posts

275 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
This is a mild example. We need more terrorists in GCHQ / MI5 / MI6. There are non-white-British terrorists in our communities and these corrective under-representation programmes help to increase the level of representation in the intelligence services, given that representation box ticking is most important it's worth the risk.

Dingu

4,885 posts

45 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
The wallies got to this thread quickly. rolleyes

turbobloke

111,865 posts

275 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
Dingu said:
The wallies got to this thread quickly. rolleyes
It's not a problem as deep thinkers arrive soon enough with profound contributions and the PHiverse is rebalanced quickly.

At least wallies aren't under-represented in intelligence service recruitment.

Dingu

4,885 posts

45 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
I’m sure you have 110k quality posts and I’ve been unlucky with the ones I’ve seen.

s1962a

6,376 posts

177 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
This is DEFINITELY something to do with immigration and brown people and hardly anything to do with inept IT systems that allowed this to happen. I mean if it was a chinese or russian spy they wouldn't have been able to get away with it at all.

/[high pitched worried voice]

turbobloke

111,865 posts

275 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
Dingu said:
I’m sure you have 110k quality posts and I’ve been unlucky with the ones I’ve seen.
Paying attention is your choice, likewise with using logical fallacies when failing to make a point. Fallacists may well be under-represented in the intelligence community, another choice for you to pass up on. It could hardly go better than the one which was meant to be the subject of this thread, which had such a positive outcome.

turbobloke

111,865 posts

275 months

Tankrizzo

7,728 posts

208 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
How tf do you bring your own device in and just connect it to a secure network? Do they have no sort of security in place?

s1962a

6,376 posts

177 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
Tankrizzo said:
How tf do you bring your own device in and just connect it to a secure network? Do they have no sort of security in place?
No security it seems.

eharding

14,530 posts

299 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
Tankrizzo said:
How tf do you bring your own device in and just connect it to a secure network? Do they have no sort of security in place?
All the reports I've read indicate it was his work phone that he used to access the secure system, and he then transferred the data from that phone to his own equipment at home later, and it took roughly a month before he was arrested- whether than was a result of a routine audit of access logs of the secure system or there was some other reason for suspicion, who knows? Either way, still a significant lapse in both security and vetting.

119

11,835 posts

51 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Yeah but….

Under represented blah blah blahhhhhhh something something.

tangerine_sedge

5,748 posts

233 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
LimaDelta said:
Shocked. Who'd have thought opening up our intelligence services to people who hate us could result in this. Still, at least our armed forces or government haven't been similarly compromised.
Who do you mean by "people who hate us" and who are "us". I'm struggling to read this in any way that doesn't make you sound like a racist, but perhaps I'm just misunderstanding.

LimaDelta

7,289 posts

233 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
tangerine_sedge said:
LimaDelta said:
Shocked. Who'd have thought opening up our intelligence services to people who hate us could result in this. Still, at least our armed forces or government haven't been similarly compromised.
Who do you mean by "people who hate us" and who are "us". I'm struggling to read this in any way that doesn't make you sound like a racist, but perhaps I'm just misunderstanding.
You read it anyway you like. The racism slur is thrown around so casually these days it's all but meaningless.

BOR

4,996 posts

270 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
Fact is, there have never been any white male british spies who have infiltrated our great british secret services.

turbobloke

111,865 posts

275 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
BOR said:
Fact is, there have never been any white male british spies who have infiltrated our great british secret services.
Were those not-spies of white British extraction appointed on a box-ticking procedure?

Years ago the first Mrs TB was a Cheltenham civil servant. She was / is a Cambridge maths graduate, so while I didn't know what she was doing I could make an informed guess. We were engaged at uni when filling out job applications, and I read her GCHQ recruitment materials, eventually applying for a role known then as GCT, I don't know if it exists nowadays. Having got through the initial interview, then taken their cryptic entrance exam in a church hall in Charlton Kings - fascinating and alone well worth the hassle of applying - it all came to a head in London in front of the largest interview panel in history with the then head of the civil service centre stage. After that I decided to say non merci and took another option. Link with the thread - based on evenings in the pub with the mrs and her workmates, it now looks likely that northerners had been under-represented around that time. After a number of years' servicing in a very civil manner, my ex decided that the job was overly tedious and wanted something more exciting and better paid, so she went into teaching. Never bored after that.

Countdown

44,415 posts

211 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
LimaDelta said:
You read it anyway you like. The racism slur is thrown around so casually these days it's all but meaningless.
The only people who tend to say that are the racists.


eharding

14,530 posts

299 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
northerners
Ah! - now LimeDelta's "to people who hate us" line makes more sense.

captain_cynic

15,131 posts

110 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
LimaDelta said:
tangerine_sedge said:
LimaDelta said:
Shocked. Who'd have thought opening up our intelligence services to people who hate us could result in this. Still, at least our armed forces or government haven't been similarly compromised.
Who do you mean by "people who hate us" and who are "us". I'm struggling to read this in any way that doesn't make you sound like a racist, but perhaps I'm just misunderstanding.
You read it anyway you like. The racism slur is thrown around so casually these days it's all but meaningless.
No, it's just plain racist and you hate having it pointed out.

BTW... The wallies didn't just get to this thread early, they started it.

DeejRC

7,583 posts

97 months

Wednesday 2nd April
quotequote all
Im somewhat amused that the main thrust of this thread is ppl whingeing about racism.
Hint chaps: whether someone is racist or not is less important than staff names being compromised.

I still remember being given the talk from the chap out of 5 about security all those many years(decades) ago. Scared the crap out of all the grads attending, then we all decided it was mostly bks and just "scare" talk. Turned out he was correct in everything he said.
You will be amazed how much it can concentrate your mind when ppl sit in cars down your street observing your house!

Im almost strictly civvy these days and much prefer it that way.