Discussion
Mannginger said:
What a terrible shame. Suspended prison sentence and barred from running for 5 years. FN can still run a candidate of course and their base will be incensed, but if she'd played by the rules she wouldn't be in this situation. Today's a good day
As noted, only if that sentence was on the cards before this trial started.Otherwise the French risk what happened in the US each time Trump was put on trial.
A prison sentence seems harsh given what we do with spending issues.
Murph7355 said:
Mannginger said:
What a terrible shame. Suspended prison sentence and barred from running for 5 years. FN can still run a candidate of course and their base will be incensed, but if she'd played by the rules she wouldn't be in this situation. Today's a good day
As noted, only if that sentence was on the cards before this trial started.Otherwise the French risk what happened in the US each time Trump was put on trial.
A prison sentence seems harsh given what we do with spending issues.
Apparently 2 years suspended, the other 2 years on a tag. But not immediate as there is the inevitable appeal.
I love how politicians insist (rightly) that criminals should be present for their sentencing, but she decided it was fine for her to walk out midway.
Murph7355 said:
I hope that penalty was clear prior to the trials etc happening (ie it's a known/std penalty for such things), as if not I suspect things could kick off badly.
I found this article from September last year, well before the trial startedhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0jw967zg0eo
BBC article said:
If Le Pen is found guilty, she could face fines and imprisonment – and potentially be declared ineligible to run for office for up to 10 years, hitting her presidential ambitions.
Seems pretty clear and upfront to megrumbledoak said:
And just as she was predicted to win. Oh we are surprised.
The mask is slipping on our sham democracies.
Oh for gods sake. So all judiciaries are corrupt?The mask is slipping on our sham democracies.
She (along with others) was found guilty by an independent judiciary in a democratic country.
Edited by ChevronB19 on Monday 31st March 12:51
Everyone in the EU misuses funds. That's why their accounts haven't been signed off by audit for years. She just happens to be the one they decided to prosecute, strange that eh...
Von Der Leyen has been implicated in several embezzlement cases some worth billions rather than millions (eg re Pfizer contracts involving her husband) as has Lagarde. They just didn't prosecute them because they never convict their own.
Von Der Leyen has been implicated in several embezzlement cases some worth billions rather than millions (eg re Pfizer contracts involving her husband) as has Lagarde. They just didn't prosecute them because they never convict their own.
Du1point8 said:
Everyone in the EU misuses funds. That's why their accounts haven't been signed off by audit for years. She just happens to be the one they decided to prosecute, strange that eh...
Von Der Leyen has been implicated in several embezzlement cases some worth billions rather than millions (eg re Pfizer contracts involving her husband) as has Lagarde. They just didn't prosecute them because they never convict their own.
And I would fully support them being prosecuted as well, subject to a level of evidence that would reach the requirements for prosecution.Von Der Leyen has been implicated in several embezzlement cases some worth billions rather than millions (eg re Pfizer contracts involving her husband) as has Lagarde. They just didn't prosecute them because they never convict their own.
But hey, implication isn’t evidence. In this case, they have evidence, and she was prosecuted, and found guilty by an independent democratic judiciary.
Does that help?
Du1point8 said:
Everyone in the EU misuses funds. That's why their accounts haven't been signed off by audit for years. She just happens to be the one they decided to prosecute, strange that eh...
Von Der Leyen has been implicated in several embezzlement cases some worth billions rather than millions (eg re Pfizer contracts involving her husband) as has Lagarde. They just didn't prosecute them because they never convict their own.
There should be a phrase for this type of false argument.Von Der Leyen has been implicated in several embezzlement cases some worth billions rather than millions (eg re Pfizer contracts involving her husband) as has Lagarde. They just didn't prosecute them because they never convict their own.
Your first point is that "it's ok because everybody else does it"/"she shouldn't be found guilty for it because not everybody else that does it has been found guilty".
I am not sure it makes what she did OK.
The second point seems to be "funny that she is the only person prosecuted despite everybody doing it [it must be political]".
That's demonstrably incorrect, numerous people have been prosecuted for misused of EU funds. If you want a list, try a google search using:
"people found guilty misusing EU funds before:2023-01-01"
It's often right wing parties so either the EU only seeks prosecution for right wing people, or....
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff