Ankle boots

Author
Discussion

Condi

Original Poster:

18,522 posts

183 months

Friday 28th March
quotequote all
Can someone help me out, what are the point of low/casual look boots? They appear to offer absolutely no ankle protection at all, and certainly don't offer any protection on the shin or from twisting of the foot. Are they any better than simply riding in trainers, if so how? Maybe it's a mental thing from always riding with sports boots on, but they just look very exposed in the event of an accident.




(I ask this because my trusting A* boots are about done, and are looking for something new. Most likely another pair of A* SMX somethings.)

Altitude

105 posts

14 months

Friday 28th March
quotequote all
Comfort, easier to walk in, looks if you're wearing more casual stuff and/or going to places where you don't want to be wearing a full set of leathers or heavy textiles all day.

Mad Maximus

564 posts

15 months

Saturday
quotequote all
The point of them is the same reason not everyone wears full one piece leathers with airbags everytime they step on a bike. You make your choice of acceptable risk and off you go.

Personally I wouldn’t buy a pair of ankle height boots unless they were truly casual.

milu

2,443 posts

278 months

Saturday
quotequote all
I wear them. I’m sure not as protective as longer boots. But they’re much sturdier than trainers

the cueball

1,402 posts

67 months

Saturday
quotequote all
I wear them due to previous (unrelated to biking) injuries.

Proper race boots are great at protecting you but come at a price on movement.

These boots allow a little more, and critically for me, it’s lateral movement that I just can’t get otherwise.

I have a pair of Alpinestars Supertech boots that I can’t use as I can’t change gear anymore.

Seems to be getting worse with age too..

smifffymoto

4,919 posts

217 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Most road accident injuries are from hitting something solid or tumbling.
I think ankle boots are sufficient protection against that for the most part.

Steve_H80

420 posts

34 months

Saturday
quotequote all
It's a case of 'they're not as good as....', 'but are better than...'
I wear a pair of short boots, not waterproof, for day rides when it's hot because I don't like overheated feet.

bogie

16,705 posts

284 months

Saturday
quotequote all
I have some short TCX boots for warmest of days ....any other time of year I find them too draughty around the ankles wink

For me Its a case of being better than trainers or casual shoes and much easier to walk about in than full height race or MX boots.

The CE approved boots have ankle and toe box reinforcements, stiffer sole, some way of securing laces and/or zip fastener etc. The downside against a taller boot is obviously shin protection.

Not all short boots are the same, as with other kit there is a range from basic protection upwards, CE marking explanation here

https://www.sportsbikeshop.co.uk/articles/advice-a...

example these boots https://www.tcxboots.com/gb/en/dartwood-wp-mens-wa...

rated CE pass level 1/2/2/1 = L1 ankle height, L2 Abrasion, L2 impact cut, L1 for transverse rigidity

pretty much as good as it gets in short boots, obviously L2 for height (shin protection) is a high boot and L2 for transverse rigidity is as stiff as a full race boot









Edited by bogie on Saturday 29th March 11:43

Cylon2007

563 posts

90 months

Saturday
quotequote all
milu said:
I wear them. I’m sure not as protective as longer boots. But they’re much sturdier than trainers
This I wear thgem mostly as well.

Pica-Pica

14,912 posts

96 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Going back to the late 1970s, I always wore ankle boots, for the stated reason that they would appear ‘normal’. I rode mostly to work. I never came off my bikes, but my boots did let in water, hence I kept a spare set of shoes and socks at work.

Andy XRV

3,876 posts

192 months

Saturday
quotequote all
As I don't really need the same level of protection as Mark Marquez and Sam Sutherland, during the summer months I only wear my Alpinestars J-6 boots which are great, warm, dry and very comfortable on & off the bike. Although I will add that now that the soles have worn they are getting quite slippery when the pegs are wet.

Maybe time for a new pair

PT1984

2,744 posts

195 months

I use these and they do cover my ankle. They give great feel of controls which is what i wanted.

https://www.sportsbikeshop.co.uk/motorcycle_parts/...

iidentifyaswoke

178 posts

31 months

Errrrr, the boots in the first post do cover you ankle. They just don’t cover your shin.

markymarkthree

2,774 posts

183 months

DMs for me, for many years. Comfy, ok to walk around in and when shagged out they become my gardening boots.

andburg

7,934 posts

181 months

I tend to wear ankles when its warm, they're much cooler which helps me concentrate on the ride. The other time i'll tend to wear them is if I'm going somewhere I know i'll be walking off the bike for a while so I dont have to wear long socks and have them slop around.

They're pretty much the default for me making my full heights for cold/wet days or if I'm going out just for a ride. I don't do that much and when i do I'm not going quickly

STe_rsv4

856 posts

110 months

Obviously not as protective as race boots but I use mine for short journeys / commuting or generally knocking around the doors. They are more comfortable and my Alpinestars have the toughened layer on the top of the foot for gear changing so you don't get blisters like you do with trainers.
As already said, they offer less protection than a full race boot so I tend to bear this in mind and ride accordingly when wearing them i.e. Im not going to be on a hoon in my jeans and short boots.

Crudeoink

938 posts

71 months

I have pair of TCX ankle boots that I use for shorter or more casual rides. Much more comfortable and easier to get on and off. Usually wear them with my kevlar jeans instead of the full power ranger suit or Textiles lot. They are loads more comfortable and dont get anywhere near as hot when you're off the bike. I always cringe when I see someone riding in trainers and think these kind of boots give you no excuse. They're generally cheaper than a pair of trainers nowadays, just as comfortable off the bike but actually provide some protection if you were to come off

jonindorset

1,074 posts

256 months

Isn't the issue with trainers / hiking boots that they don't slide well and tend to dig into the road breaking ankles, legs etc?
I'm tempted by something like this for days when I'm riding somewhere a short distance away but then mainly walking for the rest of the day...

andburg

7,934 posts

181 months

jonindorset said:
Isn't the issue with trainers / hiking boots that they don't slide well and tend to dig into the road breaking ankles, legs etc?
I'm tempted by something like this for days when I'm riding somewhere a short distance away but then mainly walking for the rest of the day...
Statistically most accidents are low speed drops where you'll stick a leg out and not quite make it so what you really want is a bit of angle protection for when you end up stuck under the bike or tweaking it on the way down. Trainers or even non-bike boots just don't offer that padding around the ankle.

It's why the instructors i know, generally say spend your money on decent boots / gloves / helmet.

Bob_Defly

4,458 posts

243 months

Alpinestars and TCX both make some good mid level boots with really decent ankle protection. I sometimes wear the SMX3's, which aren't made any more, I used to wear them all day at work too.





Of their current line up, the V2's looks quite good, as do the Superfaster Shoes.






From TCX I have the Hero 2 WP, which are very comfy indeed, again, I can wear these all day on and off the bike.



What I like about all of these is that with jeans on, you can barely tell you are wearing motorcycle shoes at work. Plus they are infinitely better than Doc Martens for protection.