'Landscape artist of the year'
Author
Discussion

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

89,398 posts

281 months

Sunday 16th February
quotequote all
Put eight artists in front of the baroque east front of Hampton Court - but they all paint the garden instead. Why? 'Cos the building is too hard to paint... excessive amount of arty bks.

Skyedriver

20,767 posts

298 months

Sunday 16th February
quotequote all
We've watched and grumbled about LAOTY in the past.
Watched the first of the new series, the winner was poor, the rest were a bad, the judges looking for something just 'cos.
Said that's it, won't watch another.

Regbuser

5,736 posts

51 months

Sunday 16th February
quotequote all
It's all about the 'mark making'..

SmithCorona

823 posts

45 months

Sunday 16th February
quotequote all
It's enjoyable with a glass or two of wine, I always feel there is more variety and interest in the wildcards and wish they would dedicate an episode to these.

I rarely agree with the judges, apart from Tai-Shan who seems reasonable.

Antony Moxey

9,850 posts

235 months

Sunday 16th February
quotequote all
Portrait artist, landscape artist, the judges to my mind look at all wrong. They mainly base their views on the painting produced in the show, not their submission, but the winner will end up producing a piece more like the submission because they’ve got the time to do it exactly how they want rather than rushing out a four hour piece.

I know it’s all subjective, but rarely have the winners been the ones whose work I’d have hanging on my walls.

SmithCorona

823 posts

45 months

Sunday 16th February
quotequote all
Agreed fully. I find potrait artist less engaging overall too.