Berkhamsted or Harpenden?

Author
Discussion

nismocat

Original Poster:

870 posts

20 months

Friday 14th February
quotequote all
I may be moving back to the UK after 10 years and it is a toss up between these two Herts towns.
Harpenden has a larger population by around 40% but Berkhamsted seems to be more middle class, not that I am of course!

Both have direct train links to London, and road (M1 and M25) but Hemel is a bit closer to Berko and that seems to have more things to do for a young kid: climbing area. snow dome, cinemas etc.

Harpenden even has an AGA store!

Anyone have experience of living in either?

belleair302

6,956 posts

219 months

Saturday 15th February
quotequote all
Read today’s Telegraph as both feature. Harpenden has grown hugely and is not what it was. Also has issues with Luton. Berkhampstead is nice, Tring and Wendover are both worth a look as is Amersham or Chesham. Radlett was an epic village but alas is now too north London and stupid money, without the village feel.

F166

25 posts

26 months

Friday 21st February
quotequote all
Any particular questions about Berkhamsted?

Turn7

24,433 posts

233 months

Friday 21st February
quotequote all
Tring is being heavily developed wit no additional infrastructure .

We struggled for a doctors appointment before the latest developments…..

thebraketester

14,891 posts

150 months

Friday 21st February
quotequote all
Harpenden is probably the slightly better of the 2 for getting into London. The berko line can be a bit sketchy at times.

Spindoctor

808 posts

212 months

Friday 21st February
quotequote all
Harpenden is looking like its going to suffer more boxy house syndrome.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce8vdy6ynl8o

DanL

6,488 posts

277 months

Friday 21st February
quotequote all
Spindoctor said:
Harpenden is looking like its going to suffer more boxy house syndrome.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce8vdy6ynl8o
Meh. They’ve been planning to develop that for as long as I can remember…

OP, I’d pick Harpenden personally, but I’m biased having grown up there and still having family there.

Any “stuff to do” things you can access from Berkhamsted you can get to from Harpenden as well, and I’d disagree that Harpenden has grown hugely or that it’s not what it was. To be able to claim that you’d have had to live there since my grandparents did in the 1940’s!

henrycrun

2,472 posts

252 months

Friday 21st February
quotequote all
Harpenden Classics on the Common

and31

3,884 posts

139 months

Friday 21st February
quotequote all
I like them both but I’d pick Harpenden

offspring86

718 posts

184 months

Wednesday 26th February
quotequote all
I grew up just outside Harpenden and went to school there. Family still live in the same place too. I'd personally avoid it like the plague (from a living perspective), outrageously expensive, and unbelievably busy.

I will add, I don't know if Berko is like that as I've rarely ever visited.

Out of curiosity, what has drawn you to these two towns?

drgoatboy

1,805 posts

219 months

Thursday 27th February
quotequote all
Localish to both. Both very expensive housing and very middle class!
High streets are very similar in terms of size and content.

I like both towns a lot and wish I could afford either!

Harependen feels a little more spread out and probably has more larger houses than berko. Has the Bupa hospital which is useful if you have private healthcare. Obviously closer to the m1 so a little more convenient and I believe the trains to London are a little more frequent and reliable but I have no direct experience of that.

Berko is a bit more compact so more of a market town vibe. Housing near the town centre can be a bit cramped and parking is hateful! Some nice things nearby like ashridge estate if you are into hiking or cycling and the canal going through the middle too. Seems like an awful thing to say but I always get the impression that berkhampstead is a bit snooty. I don't get that so much in harependen but I have spent less time there to be fair.

They are both great towns, transport links and availability of housing are probably the deciding factors....

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

30,908 posts

247 months

Thursday 27th February
quotequote all
Both towns are nice places, so that's a good start.

If you can push the boat out I'd plump for St Albans which has a great blend of pubs and restaurants etc. Mind, it's eye wateringly expensive!

markiii

4,007 posts

206 months

Thursday 27th February
quotequote all
for me st albans isn't teh place it was 20 years ago when we lived there.

Harpenden better by far,

possibly look at Redbourn if quite village within easy 5 mins of both Harpenden and St Albans appeals


Job38

1,973 posts

248 months

Friday 14th March
quotequote all
Berkhamstead has more charm and environs prettier owing to canal and more rural location.

Harpenden - London in 25 mins, outstanding secondary schools, lots of interesting cars, great rugby town, many football teams for kids etc.

Have lived in Harpenden for 15 years, ideal place to bring up young people.