Most important discovery - DNA or X-Rays?
Most important discovery - DNA or X-Rays?

Poll: Most important discovery - DNA or X-Rays?

Total Members Polled: 24

DNA: 46%
X-Rays: 54%
Author
Discussion

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

90,800 posts

286 months

Saturday 18th January 2025
quotequote all
For some reason this question floated into my head earlier... what do you think and why?

eharding

14,648 posts

305 months

Sunday 19th January 2025
quotequote all

I thought the original DNA discovery was done using X-ray diffraction? Hence, even if our understanding of DNA is of greater benefit to mankind, without our knowledge of X-rays, we wouldn't have had that understanding. Hence X-rays get the...er...X.

By coincidence I was clearing out the eaves today and found my old undergraduate Applied Physics practical notes, with some film strips from the X-ray crystallography sessions, taken some 40 years ago....


Simpo Two

Original Poster:

90,800 posts

286 months

Sunday 19th January 2025
quotequote all
The double helix part was worked out by the X-rays, incidentally making an X-shape which somehow they knew indicated a helix. So yes, one discovery led to another

But thinking of mankind as a whole, which has been more advantageous?

abzmike

11,118 posts

127 months

Sunday 19th January 2025
quotequote all
In terms of mending people that have broken things, or have issues to be looked at X-rays have been more important up until now - from now on DNA will be important for preventing and curing disease. But if you think you’ve broken your leg, DNA isn’t going to help.

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

90,800 posts

286 months

Sunday 19th January 2025
quotequote all
abzmike said:
In terms of mending people that have broken things, or have issues to be looked at X-rays have been more important up until now - from now on DNA will be important for preventing and curing disease. But if you think you’ve broken your leg, DNA isn’t going to help.
Perhaps we could say 'both' then: X-rays for tactics and DNA for strategy.

maffski

1,905 posts

180 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
abzmike said:
...But if you think you’ve broken your leg, DNA isn’t going to help....
I disagree with your point of view, without DNA it doesn't have a leg to stand on.

CraigyMc

18,066 posts

257 months

Tuesday 28th January 2025
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
For some reason this question floated into my head earlier... what do you think and why?
I think "this is probably why simpo has 87000 posts".

Austin Prefect

1,582 posts

13 months

Thursday 6th February 2025
quotequote all
abzmike said:
In terms of mending people that have broken things, or have issues to be looked at X-rays have been more important up until now - from now on DNA will be important for preventing and curing disease. But if you think you’ve broken your leg, DNA isn’t going to help.
By that reckoning plaster and crutches are more important than X rays.

Yahonza

3,255 posts

51 months

Tuesday 11th February 2025
quotequote all
X-Rays - because of their fundamental application in medical imaging, the science of materials, crystallography, astronomy, and various other things.
DNA may become the more important discovery in the long term but the 'discovery' of this genetic material was a long and complex one. We still don't understand fully how DNA orchestrates what goes on in an organism - there are also many other players in the world of molecular biology.

Several of the people that discovered X-rays also suffered for their art, in that many died from over-exposure to this ionising radiation which damaged their DNA in the process.