Refurbished engines

Refurbished engines

Author
Discussion

A500leroy

Original Poster:

6,750 posts

133 months

Wednesday 15th January
quotequote all
If a high mileage engine is taken apart, all the parts checked, whatever is worn is replaced, un worn parts put back in, is that as good as a brand new engine?

GreenV8S

30,859 posts

299 months

Wednesday 15th January
quotequote all
A500leroy said:
un worn parts
Not sure what you think that would cover.

On a high mileage engine all the moving parts are likely to be worn. That means all bearings, pistons, bore, valve train and so on. Unless you do a nut-and-bolt rebuild incuding a full top and bottom end rebuild complete with new bearings and bores, it is not like new.

KingGary

1,082 posts

15 months

Wednesday 15th January
quotequote all
Every part is designed and built within tolerance, if it’s outside, it needs replacing. There’s no new or old about it, unless it’s a new engine. It’s fine to inspect and refit old parts if they aren’t considered worn.

Vsix and Vtec

964 posts

33 months

Wednesday 15th January
quotequote all
In short, no. However that does a disservice to the whole truth, that being that whilst it will never have as little wear on it as a new engine, in the main it just doesn't matter. A reconditioned engine will have the parts that matter in good order, and will be serviceable for many years to come. The fact it has a sump that's not "as new" or block, or cam cover, makes almost no difference, so long as the used items are within tolerance. The lower cost is due to this factor, but that's not to say the reliability is less.

Put it this way, the biggest factor on reliability isn't usually how new it is, it's how well it's treated.

E-bmw

11,051 posts

167 months

Thursday 16th January
quotequote all
A500leroy said:
If a high mileage engine is taken apart, all the parts checked, whatever is worn is replaced, un worn parts put back in, is that as good as a brand new engine?
Simple answer is an obvious no.

Doesn't mean it won't give good service for many years/miles.

kestral

1,960 posts

222 months

Thursday 23rd January
quotequote all
A500leroy said:
If a high mileage engine is taken apart, all the parts checked, whatever is worn is replaced, un worn parts put back in, is that as good as a brand new engine?
It depends what you mean by 'as good'.

If an engine is rebuit properly it will do exactly the same as factory supplied brand new engine.

If the engine is rebuilt to a high spec it will be an improvement on a factory supplied engine.

Richard-D

1,470 posts

79 months

Thursday 23rd January
quotequote all
I've had such poor experiences with reconditioned engines that I either rebuild myself or fit a 2nd hand engine from a breakers. A reconditioned engine should be a safe bet but on the 3 occasions I've gone this route (over about 25 years) it's been a resounding fail.

Megaflow

10,388 posts

240 months

Thursday 23rd January
quotequote all
A500leroy said:
If a high mileage engine is taken apart, all the parts checked, whatever is worn is replaced, un worn parts put back in, is that as good as a brand new engine?
That is entirely dependant on how you are defining what is worn.

Material properties can degrade over time due to thermal and mechanical fatigue, so unless you perform a full range of mat lab tests, you can't be sure the material is the same as when it is no. An example is the Rover K series, it know for annealing it's head when it over heats and once they get to a certain hardness the head casting is scrap.