RE: Audi TT 3.2 V6 | Shed of the Week

RE: Audi TT 3.2 V6 | Shed of the Week

Friday 20th December 2024

Audi TT 3.2 V6 | Shed of the Week

The TT is gone for good. But its legacy remains intact - even at shed money...


What’s Audi’s most successful car ever? The answer, if you’re interested, is the A4, which celebrated its 30th birthday this year with somewhere between 7.5 and 8 million (and counting) cars sold over five generations. 

The number of Audi TTs sold is somewhat smaller at 660,000, but Shed would argue that that’s as significant an achievement as the A4’s. Not just because the TT’s 25-year production run was shorter, or even because it was so much more of a niche product than the A4, but because it’s received more four and five-star reviews (or the equivalent thereof) from journalists and owners over the course of its life than any other car ever. Probably.

The 3.2 quattro that we’re looking at here was a niche within a niche, accounting for fewer than 1 in 17 of the total number of TTs made. With 247hp, 236lb ft and the DSG twin-clutch gearbox in place it did the 0-60mph in 6.2 seconds, which was less time than it took the 30kg lighter manual 3.2. Statto types say the difference was only 0.1 seconds, but Shed will bet one of his old boots that in UK conditions at least the gap between them would have been wider. The DSG emitted less CO2 than the manual too, at 238g/km versus 254g/km. Either way, our TT slots into the mystery VED Band K* for high-CO2 cars built before 23 March 2006, making the annual tax bill £415 instead of the increasingly normal shed-killing rate of £710. Official fuel consumption was 28mpg. 

Our 2003 example has done 121,000 miles, an average of under 6,000 a year. Apart from a small scuff on the offside rear wing it looks to be in very decent nick. The MOT history shows nothing untoward, the most recent test in August revealing one worn nearside rear brake disc and the classic mention of ‘product’ on the headlamp lenses. While we’re here, has anybody tried one of those miracle cures you see on Facebook where the guy squirts on his magic liquid and bang! the ‘product’ is gone? Asking for Shed, who thinks he can see an opportunity for some quick cash getting village cars through the MOT for their sobbing old owners. 

We’re told that this car has had a recent offside rear wheel bearing and a nearside front CV joint. It also has a bonus misfire. Coil packs fail on TTs generally and it could just be that. If so, it’s a cheap and easy fix. Less cheap and easy would be a kiboshed fuel pump. That’s a wear and tear thing that’s more likely to happen if the car has been regularly run low on fuel as the pump enjoys the cooling effect of fuel sloshing over it. So they say anyway. 

Anything else that might go phut? Well, timing chain tensioners have a bit of a reputation on this VR6 engine, another wear and tear thing that, like the fuel pump, isn’t cheap to put right. It’s also worth keeping an eye on coolant levels, and leading on from that, the condition of the water pump, radiator, thermostat, hoses and seals. There have been odd issues with the DSG box on the 3.2, and the battery does need to be in good nick if you want to avoid annoying electrical issues. 

You might also get the odd squeal on startup, something Shed occasionally experiences with the postmistress. That could be worn starter motor bushes, but if Shed’s MX-5 is any guide it’s more likely to be nothing worse than a slack aux belt. Fixing it is a two-minute job on the Mazda but he hasn’t done it on a TT so don’t blame him if it turns out to be a day-spoiler. 

The other common issue with these cars is misbehaviour in the instrument pod area. There might be complete or partial loss of the LCD display, loss of tacho and speedo functions, misreading fuel and temperature gauges, pulsing backlights, a failure to start because of immobiliser lockout, or all of the above. You can spend a fortune on a factory replacement pod that will come with a miserable six-month warranty or you can go on eBay to have your existing pod rebuilt for £145 with a lifetime guarantee thrown in. 

Some of these issues can be avoided with half-decent maintenance so any potential buyer would be well advised to examine any paperwork that hopefully comes with this car. Shed has been examining paperwork himself recently, specifically his marriage certificate in the hopes of finding some sort of get-out clause. No luck so far, so he’s now checking to see if the old ‘in flagrante delicto’ thing of being caught with your pants down – bang! the missis is gone! – might still apply. 


See the full ad

Author
Discussion

Rocket Ricardo

Original Poster:

163 posts

91 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
First! Yes… childish I know.

A truly interesting shed though!

el romeral

1,503 posts

150 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
Cracking shed and actually looks way too good to be classed as a shed. The front seats look a bit grubby and in need of a clean but otherwise, very nice.

dralig

13 posts

12 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
Had one of the first TTs in the UK some years ago (before they retrofitted the spoiler and TCS) and loved it. Wasn’t without gremlins (especially electrical), couldn’t be described as the sharpest drive in the world and had rear seats that were a waste of leather but a great car that I still miss. Chopped it in for a particularly dull Passat when kids came along

McRors

377 posts

69 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
Good Mk I TTs are becoming quite rare so this one seems to be a good buy. Such an excellent design. I wonder if, in a few years, good ones might start to rises in value.

Court_S

14,169 posts

190 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
I like that. I’d happily tool around in that.

I like the first gen TT and think it’s a great bit of design and really like the interior.

grumpy52

5,817 posts

179 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
I remember being fairly excited about these when they were new, I was much younger ,slimmer and more agile back then , Imagine my frustration when I gave myself concussion trying to get in one for the first time .

Augustus Windsock

3,599 posts

168 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
“You might also get the odd squeal on startup, something Shed occasionally experiences with the postmistress. ”

That made my day…!
Funnily enough I always ‘scan’ the article for Shed-isms before I read the article itself.
Oh, sorry, yes, there was mention of an Audi? A TT I believe?
Yeah, great shed, hairdressers car, blunt handling (just trying to get as many stereotypes in before I have to go and have a squirt over the old girl outside. Sorry, to clarify, a squirt of driver over my old banger. The car, not the wife…)

Gibbler290

711 posts

108 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
Damn that’s quite a car for £2k. Great colour/wheel/interior selection.

SteRB5138

186 posts

227 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
Is this SOTY, saving the best to last? Thats got be worth a £2k punt?

SteveTTT

122 posts

149 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
We had one some years ago, 2004 car in that exact spec except it had BBS 3 piece split rims. It was and remains Mrs T’s favourite of all the many cars she’s had, but it wasn’t without issues. I felt it was a bit leaden to drive but it certainly went well and the VR6 sounded great.

The mechatronic unit had been replaced under its previous ownership but it sh@t its Haldex and I got ripped off by a cowboy gearbox “specialist” in Fareham who charged me for replacing a gearbox bearing but not solving the problem. I eventually sourced a used Haldex, fitted by a local VAG specialist, which resolved matters.

The dot matrix display duly lost a load of pixels, as they do, and wheels were starting to look scruffy and I was quoted £240 each to refurb and rebuild them, and in 2017 when I thought I started to hear timing chain rattle on startup (a very big job) I decided the time had come to move it on.

Edited by SteveTTT on Friday 20th December 07:32

AndySheff

6,757 posts

220 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
That seems like quite a good car for the money. I just never liked these though.

KEF

65 posts

195 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
Looks like a great shed to me, nice write up too.

Seems amazing that talking about a 21 year old car there’s no mention of corrosion, are they really that sound underneath?
Changed days from shoddy 3 year old cavaliers or some of the Italian rust buckets I looked at as a teenager.

J4CKO

44,058 posts

213 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
“Sometimes misfires”, I would be very wary of that, might just be a coil pack but could be the timing chain or various sensors, be prepared to spend ages tinkering in VCDS (Needy old VAG pampering software) moving coil packs and seeing if the misfire moves between cylinders as well. It’s usually coil packs on the turbo models.

these can look very shiny but can have a multitude of issues, mine was an utter pain like 7 years ago.

I do really like them but this triggers my PTTTSD.

You might be lucky, and it’s worth two grand but it’s more about the time and money you sink into it than the purchase price, in terms of a purchase an old TT is less like a car and more like a Panini football sticker album, I.e the initial price is trivial but the subsequent spend will likely soon overtake that.


Russ_16v

144 posts

194 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
The misfire could be a coil. Or it could be a stretched timing chain. The former is cheap, the latter is 2/3'rds of the price of the car.

Inline5

26 posts

55 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
Ran a mkv R32 with wingbacks for eight years. When you boil it down,it was a five door hatch with a big engine,but RSQ3,Cayman and now,an S3 down the road,it’s still the one I miss the most. The sound of it was just sublime!

dunnoreally

1,252 posts

121 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
I'm sure I remember a consensus among reviewers that the 225 1.8t is a much nicer steer than the v6. Never driven one, though, so I don't know how true that is.

V6 auto in particular feels an interesting idea. Maybe being a little GT actually suits its character better than something trying to be properly sporting?

Andy86GT

608 posts

78 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
You always have to ask, if it was 'just a coil pack' to fix the misfire, why isn't already done?

bangerhoarder

638 posts

81 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
Mechatronic failure always makes me wary of these. Manuals are rare and much pricier now.

To answer a question from above - not, they’re good but not immune to corrosion. Typically sill covers and the edges of the front wings. The sills fill with grot and can rot out the inners. Subframes quite commonly rot through, and differ between coupe and roadster.

Acorn1

1,560 posts

33 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
Looking a little dated now, but an iconic car nonetheless.

I had a 225 back 06 which I loved.

£2k is nuts for that when you think about it.

s m

23,754 posts

216 months

Friday 20th December 2024
quotequote all
Court_S said:
I like that. I’d happily tool around in that.

I like the first gen TT and think it’s a great bit of design and really like the interior.
Same really - a friend has a late one with the early derivative handling mods and it’s a capable little car to drive - pretty quick but it’s the 4-pot turbo version