Labour MP farming family tax avoidance
Discussion
Couldn't see a post about this....
https://www.westerntelegraph.co.uk/news/24766306.m...
I don't have any particular axe to grind. I think people should be able to avoid (not evade) tax, but that is not the message that has been forced on us all of late.
Whether there was any inside knowledge or not, just the very process of circumventing a HMRC tax revenue of such significance certainly seems at odds with the overall message labour are trying to promote.
https://www.westerntelegraph.co.uk/news/24766306.m...
I don't have any particular axe to grind. I think people should be able to avoid (not evade) tax, but that is not the message that has been forced on us all of late.
Whether there was any inside knowledge or not, just the very process of circumventing a HMRC tax revenue of such significance certainly seems at odds with the overall message labour are trying to promote.
Even if they were forewarned, what possible advantage could that be to them? In any event, if you're wealthy and in any kind of tax position that can possibly be spun, by this rabble of pound shop socialists, into any kind of 'tax break for the rich' then you have to assume you're in the firing line.
Pouhon said:
Couldn't see a post about this....
https://www.westerntelegraph.co.uk/news/24766306.m...
I don't have any particular axe to grind. I think people should be able to avoid (not evade) tax, but that is not the message that has been forced on us all of late.
Whether there was any inside knowledge or not, just the very process of circumventing a HMRC tax revenue of such significance certainly seems at odds with the overall message labour are trying to promote.
You do though.https://www.westerntelegraph.co.uk/news/24766306.m...
I don't have any particular axe to grind. I think people should be able to avoid (not evade) tax, but that is not the message that has been forced on us all of late.
Whether there was any inside knowledge or not, just the very process of circumventing a HMRC tax revenue of such significance certainly seems at odds with the overall message labour are trying to promote.
And nowhere have I seen the Labour government suggest legal tax avoidance goes against some message.
It’s a weird one, if they knew beforehand because they had insider information it’s stupid to do it before the budget as they didn’t need to do it then anyway. Ok if they do it after they also look to be making a mockery of labours law anyway as it shows that the rich can avoid it easily and it looks like labour on,y really want to target actual farmers.
Interesting to note that the MPs father is a trained chartered accountant
Interesting to note that the MPs father is a trained chartered accountant
119 said:
Terminator X said:
Within the rules? Can't really complain.
TX.
"MP denies he tipped off family to avoid farm tax changes"TX.
Hmmmm.
Out of interest are Cabinet Minister allowed to ‘benefit from the free market’ like say Nancy Pelosi?
rscott said:
119 said:
Terminator X said:
Within the rules? Can't really complain.
TX.
"MP denies he tipped off family to avoid farm tax changes"TX.
Hmmmm.
119 said:
rscott said:
119 said:
Terminator X said:
Within the rules? Can't really complain.
TX.
"MP denies he tipped off family to avoid farm tax changes"TX.
Hmmmm.
Far more likely this was something which had been underway for months as part of normal, sensible tax planning by a farming family, same as many others out there.
rscott said:
119 said:
rscott said:
119 said:
Terminator X said:
Within the rules? Can't really complain.
TX.
"MP denies he tipped off family to avoid farm tax changes"TX.
Hmmmm.
Far more likely this was something which had been underway for months as part of normal, sensible tax planning by a farming family, same as many others out there.
The Budget decisions themselves wouldn't have been finalised until a week or two before the day itself.
As above, an implementation date 18 months in the future.
This is a non-issue (and there are far more bad things this Government have done).
119 said:
valiant said:
119 said:
It’s alleged that he gave his folks the heads up before any announcement was made.
To what benefit?There would have to be a really special set of circumstances for there to be any benefit to handing the farm over a month ago rather than now unless they happen to die within the next seven years instead of seven years and seven months and then it will be a marginal rate of IHT to pay anyway.
Daily Flail readers will love the story because it feeds into their labour bad, conservatives/reform good trope.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff