RE: 2025 Nissan Ariya Nismo | PH Review

RE: 2025 Nissan Ariya Nismo | PH Review

Wednesday 18th September

2025 Nissan Ariya Nismo | PH Review

Another week, another electric crossover aimed at enthusiasts. We head to Japan to try it


Nismo sells 80 per cent of its cars in its Japanese homeland. A stark number on paper, but a thoroughly believable one when you consider its current presence – or lack thereof – in Europe. Rewind a decade and its three-car line-up spanned volume, intrigue and superstar quality. No need to state that the Juke Nismo, 370 Nismo and GT-R Nismo fell respectively under each of those pillars.

While the former is no true PH hall-of-famer, Nismo shifted enough of them to justify the more boisterous Juke Nismo RS, a relation of the contemporary Clio Trophy but with a manual ‘box in the middle. It wasn’t bad, whatever you made of the looks. A foundation of fast crossovers allows you to keep selling the GT-R cherry on top, too.

Let’s hope this new Ariya Nismo kickstarts a similarly diverse era. It arrives on European shores in January 2025 as that most zeitgeisty of things: an all-electric crossover with a whole ream of active safety initialisms and over 400hp from its dual motors. It’s not the first of its kind on the market and it won’t be the last.

Good job it looks the part, then. The standard Ariya is an uncommonly pretty EV from the right angles and the Nissan Motorsport makeover manages to be both subtle and worthwhile. The designers say the aesthetic portrays dual personalities – classy up top, but racier downstairs amongst the splitters and skirts, the red striping representing the boundary in between. The aero bits work, too – downforce is up 40 per cent on a stock Ariya with no impact on its 0.30 drag coefficient – although Nismo won’t be drawn on precise numbers beyond that.

The suspension has had a makeover, too; three per cent stiffer up front, ten at the rear, while the torque split of the dual motors’ e4ORCE four-wheel-drive system is now more biased towards the back, albeit variable to the road surface beneath. The front takes a maximum of 60 per cent, the rear 75, though with the motors operating independently, this merely comes from one motor being dimmed rather than torque being smartly shuffled around. There are no RWD-only drift shenanigans, though the stability control reins have been loosened a little.

Power is punchy but some way behind a Hyundai Ioniq 5 N, the car that most naturally nominates itself as a rival even if Nismo’s followed a different path. Peaks of 435hp and 442lb ft aren’t up massively on the Ariya Evolve+ perched below, thus 0-62mph takes a modest (comparative to rivals) five seconds flat. The engineers make a bigger deal of its 50-70mph time of 2.4 seconds, which is quicker than a Z Nismo.

Reality backs it up. Acceleration from a standstill won’t drop your jaw, but the ‘in-gear’ performance is properly sprightly. The linearity of its performance also betrays a car that’s best driven shy of full commitment, when its relatively supple ride and light but largely feel-free steering result in a car less frantic than the Hyundai. Low speed imperfections can occasionally rattle through the car but it broadly lollops along as well as you’d dare hope given its mass and 20-inch Enkei wheels.

There are no simulated gearchanges or combustion noises to distract (or intrigue) you but there’s reward to be had from digging more into the Ariya’s dynamics. It resists understeer remarkably well for a 2.2-ton lump and you can tuck it neatly into corners and get straight on the throttle to power out, an occasional flourish of wheelspin if you’re really keen. Though I couldn’t always work out from which axle. Your best bet for discovering how the torque is split is largely via a dashboard display, which says a lot about how rich (or otherwise) the dialogue is from your usual touchpoints.

It'll oversteer too, albeit with more loutish inputs and some insouciance towards its length and mass. Which brings us onto the main bugbear that keeps this car in the ‘good’ populace of performance EVs rather than the ‘great’: Nismo hasn’t uprated the brakes. It’s retuned the ABS, we’re told, but the discs and calipers haven’t physically bulked up. The whiff of overworked metal emanated after a small string of corners and my trust in the brakes to truly bite hard waned soon after. You can still have fun, just in a demure and mindful way. Selecting the strong regen of its E-Pedal setting does help you avoid the left pedal for much of the time, at least.

While this Ariya is a pricier product than that old Juke (the UK tag is TBC, but let’s assume a mite north of £60,000), a revisit of our 2015 Nismo RS review reveal some parity between the two. “How many Juke Nismo RS customers will know of 400R Skylines and Z-Tune 350Zs? Few, you would imagine,” a younger – but no less tall – Matt Bird said. “Nismo fans probably aren't Juke fans and vice versa. It's a strange idea in principle to bring them together and one that's equally bemusing on the road; some parts feel encouragingly Nismo-fettled and others still feel like a Juke.”

So feels the Ariya, which sits at the lighter end of performance makeovers, but potentially to its benefit as a daily proposition – a decent WLTP range figure from its 87kWh battery pending, of course, especially when max DC charging is a modest 130kW.

It looks good, has a uniquely Zen interior and offers strong performance without being gauche. There’s also a charm, romanticism and 40 years of history to Nismo that, for anyone brought up on Best Motoring, Gran Turismo and ‘Ring lap times, might just swing a buying decision in the Ariya’s favour if you’re seeking a company car with a twist rather than an outright enthusiast purchase.

A new GT-R will almost certainly play the role of halo, too, albeit with a gap between the end of R35 production in 2025 and its arrival. Perhaps a gap that coincides with Nissan coming good on its aim to bring solid-state batteries to market by 2028; surely a vital ingredient in extracting strong enough performance from an electrified powertrain without truly buggering up the weight. 

“Solid-state technology solves a lot of the problems of EV batteries such as density, heat etc,” says Nissan product chief Pierre Loing. “Those vehicles with 150 or 200kWh batteries? It’s a nonsense – the weight, the cost, the big wheels and tyres and brakes that they need. Solid-state helps us break that cycle.” Perhaps 2023’s striking Hyper Force concept is more of a preview than we first thought.

Whatever comes next to truly sate PHer palates, though, this Ariya is likely a crucial step along the way. It won’t cause Hyundai any restless nights, but it might occupy an interesting enough sliver of the car buying Venn diagram to fill your needs. Maybe, in time, an RS iteration can sharpen up its areas of obvious flab, a la Juke. Either way, it’s nice to have Nismo back.


SPECIFICATION | 2025 NISSAN ARIYA NISMO

Engine: 91 kWh battery (gross figure; 87kWh useable), dual electric motors
Transmission: Single-speed automatic, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 435
Torque (lb ft): 442
0-62mph: 5.0 seconds
Top speed: TBC, c124mph
Weight: TBC, c2,210kg
MPG: TBC WLTP range, 130kW max charge rate
CO2: 0g/km
Price: TBC, c£65,000

Author
Discussion

Kipsrs

Original Poster:

484 posts

54 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
Not that this is my cup of tea but, I have real issues with vehicles which command premium prices that have generic brakes! Just me?

cerb4.5lee

32,650 posts

185 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
No, and I prefer brakes that at least have a decent(ish) looking caliper on them too.


sdiggle

187 posts

95 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
'Good job it looks the part, then.' No... it looks like an SUV. So it will have a high centre of gravity, poor handling etc. Does not look 'the part'!

evo2073

41 posts

144 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
Downforce??

British Beef

2,314 posts

170 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all

Just another expensive bloated electric SUV, claiming sporting pretences (see also; M, AMG, RS, Turbo, GR, and now Nismo).

I would rather drive a Sunny :-)

AndySheff

6,671 posts

212 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
Generic electric SUV/Crossover ? For the enthusiast ? rofl

Liquid Tuna

1,403 posts

161 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
I've just read the "NISMO celebrates 40 memorable years" topic, and then clicked on this one....a bit sad really

Gibbler290

630 posts

100 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
Doesn’t seem like this will do well in Europe. Can see them shifting a few stateside, however.

A shame so many cars have to look like this now…

andy43

10,212 posts

259 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
I like what they’ve done with the interior.
Rest of it is a turd rolled in glitter.
One of those turds where you happen to spot it down there and think I should really get something tested or stop eating steak five times a week.
Welcome to the future.

PistonTim

548 posts

144 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
I have a 'regular' Ariya e4orce (304 bhp / 0-60 5.5 ish) which is a lovely everyday car with enough oomph to be interesting but also do lots of miles, but think this goes anywhere near far enough - it needed to be much more aggressive rather than just a tweak of the motors, some red bits and adding 'downforce' - really?

The short lived e4orce+ model has been discontinued, I imagine because not enough gap between the Nismo.

As for the as yet undisclosed range, I would expect that to be 200-220ish miles which probably explains why it's not being mentioned.

If I was in the market the 5N would be my choice or possibly the upcoming 2025 refreshed Tesla Y performance (Elon notwithstanding).

Edited by PistonTim on Wednesday 18th September 09:03

C5_Steve

4,407 posts

108 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
PistonTim said:
I have a 'regular' Ariya 4orce (304 bhp / 0-60 5.5 ish) which is a lovely everyday car with enough performance to be interesting but also do lots of miles, but think this goes anywhere near far enough - it needed to be much more aggressive rather than just a tweak of the motors, some red bits and adding 'downforce' - really?

The short lived e4orce+ model has been discontinued, I imagine because not enough gap between the Nismo.

As for the as yet undisclosed range, I would expect that to be 200ish miles which probably explains why it's not being mentioned.

If I was in the market the 5N would be my choice or possibly the upcoming 2025 refreshed Tesla Y performance (Elon notwithstanding).
I don't get all the hate for the way this looks, I think the Ariya is a really interesting-looking car for what it is. Far more pleasing to look at than a Juke or Qashqai. In this trim I think it looks great, but I'm totally with you that it doesn't go far enough to command the premium.

I said on the other article, I'm not really sure who this is made for and I'd almost go as far to say it's hurting the Nismo brand but we do already have the Nismo Juke so I think it's already gone the way of M where it's just stuck on stuff now.

Might be quite attractive on the used market once the price has fallen like a stone.

Clivey

5,210 posts

209 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
andy43 said:

Rest of it is a turd rolled in glitter.
One of those turds where you happen to spot it down there and think I should really get something tested or stop eating steak five times a week.
Welcome to the future.
yes

I honestly can't comprehend how anyone with functioning eyes can look at the proportions of this type of..."thing" and think it looks even remotely attractive.

Stuff like this, the Model Y and most of the other electric crossover blobs remind me of bullfrogs, heavily pregnant livestock or morbidly obese people that have to get craned out of their house because they're too fat to fit through the door. Add the face of Voldemort to a few of them and it's not a good look, no matter how much stick-on RICE they add.

Mike1990

1,006 posts

136 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
Not my cuppa, but it’s nice to see Nismo badges appear again i suppose.

It’s a shame we can’t get the new Z over here!

cerb4.5lee

32,650 posts

185 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
Mike1990 said:
It’s a shame we can’t get the new Z over here!
I completely agree with you on that too! thumbup

Drithari

3 posts

20 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
I really don't understand the "for enthusiasts" in the title.

Enthusiasts of what?

Lumpy, 2,5 tonnes and aerodynamically aberrate?

Another crossover that's completely disconnected from the road?


DaveyBoyWonder

2,667 posts

179 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
I literally can't think of many cars I'd less like to own. If I wanted a generic eco-blob maybe, just maybe it'd feature on my radar for a few seconds before I bought one of the few better looking eco-blobs from VW/Hyundai etc.

J4CKO

42,426 posts

205 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
Mike1990 said:
It’s a shame we can’t get the new Z over here!
I completely agree with you on that too! thumbup
Suppose we can blame ourselves as a nation for that, not many folk want a powerful 2 seater coupe, but loads want crossovers.

Well, I say want, most of it is need as 2 seater coupes and convertibles are a lot less useful in most ways thart people actually use a car for, and not everyone wants or can afford a selection of vehicles.

So, crossovers are the Swiss Army Knife of cars, a lot would like something slinkier but the reality of budgets, kids, elderly relatives, hobbies, tip runs, B and Q visits, dogs and the like mean it just wouldnt work for them.

If you are single, no kids, no old folk, dog and you live in a flat and buy one, have a word with yourself please !




bosshog

1,632 posts

281 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
2.2 tons!

Firebobby

665 posts

44 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
It's a little weird and I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but! Quite a few of these cars, Ioniq5n, ev6gt, now this all seems to start at £65k? Is there some collusion going on here?? Or simply coincidence?

Julian Scott

3,216 posts

29 months

Wednesday 18th September
quotequote all
C5_Steve said:
I don't get all the hate for the way this looks, I think the Ariya is a really interesting-looking car for what it is. Far more pleasing to look at than a Juke or Qashqai. In this trim I think it looks great, but I'm totally with you that it doesn't go far enough to command the premium.

Same. Manufacturer launches a generic looking EV designed like an ICE and it gets slammed for lack of innovative styling and failure to take advantage of the packaging constraints (or lack of them).

Manufacturer launches something that looks a bit different and does take advantage of the packaging constraints (or lack of them) and gets slammed for its looks.

Ditto manufactures are getting criticised for just making sporty EVs merely about power, too much power....then this gets slammed for not having more power and go-faster bits.


I'm no EV evangelist, but I am a motoring fan that wants to see cars be interesting and to see manufacturers develop. This, to me, is an interesting step because they have taken an old school performance model approach, not just stuck on bland power gains, but looked at the drive, the in-gear acceleration etc. Small step that way perhaps, but small steps in the right direction.