Considering buying an R171 SLK

Considering buying an R171 SLK

Author
Discussion

rscott

Original Poster:

16,016 posts

203 months

Monday 16th September 2024
quotequote all
I'm looking for a second car to replace the MX5 and came across a 2005 SLK 350 (manual!) in black, with red and black leather interior.

Supposedly has only done 60,000 miles, but doesn't appear to have much of a service history.

Had a test drive today, everything seemed to work and it certainly went well when I put my foot down.

Anything to be wary of when purchasing one of these? Should I get the rear subframes checked out before purchase, or not worry as MB appear to be offering free replacements still.

Do these need to be serviced by a specialist, or should any competent indy be able to look after one?

BlimeyCharlie

950 posts

154 months

Thursday 19th September 2024
quotequote all
My 2005 SLK was off the road and for nearly 6 months with the rear subframe problem, 5 of those months at MB.
I did have a courtesy car supplied from MB, but not an experience I'd wish to repeat.

Buy one that has already had it done if possible.

Don't think low/high miles is a factor with rust.
Check MOT history for brake pipes rusting.

Basic stuff really, check everything works. Lights were rubbish on my 350SLK, worst I've had on any car - new bulbs made hardly any difference and a total pain to change them as - would you guess - screws holding them in all rusted...

See a theme here?

Bi-Xenon or however spelt much better if you are lucky.

rscott

Original Poster:

16,016 posts

203 months

Thursday 19th September 2024
quotequote all
Thanks! MOT history looks pretty good.It may have been chavved a bit early in it's life - had advisories for coloured lenses - but apart from that, no hint of rust.

Advert doesn't say if it has xenons, but there's no headlight adjuster, so assume it has.

Digging a bit more into this car and it looks like it's been on their forecourt for about 5 months and has already dropped in price by £1k. Probably going to leave it for now, unless my MX-5 fails it's MOT horribly today..


frontfloater

378 posts

154 months

Thursday 19th September 2024
quotequote all
As well as those cosmetic points mentioned, many of the pre-2008 cars had a significant engine defect. There are several comprehensive buyer guides online, including this one :

https://forums.mercedesclub.org.uk/index.php?threa...

which has a link to this look-up site :

https://www.mercedesmedic.com/check-my-mercedes-be...

This page highlights the several common rust points :

https://www.slkworld.com/threads/the-ultimate-in-c...

My advice is simply to buy the latest and very best one you can afford, NOT a fixer-upper. You can't turn a bad 'un into a good 'un for anything like the price differential between them. And a service history is essential. One major undisclosed defect on a cheap no-history car could cost you as much to fix as the car itself cost.


rscott

Original Poster:

16,016 posts

203 months

Thursday 19th September 2024
quotequote all
Thanks for the info. Time to look elsewhere, I think.

BlimeyCharlie

950 posts

154 months

Friday 20th September 2024
quotequote all
frontfloater said:
As well as those cosmetic points mentioned, many of the pre-2008 cars had a significant engine defect. There are several comprehensive buyer guides online, including this one :

https://forums.mercedesclub.org.uk/index.php?threa...

which has a link to this look-up site :

https://www.mercedesmedic.com/check-my-mercedes-be...

This page highlights the several common rust points :

https://www.slkworld.com/threads/the-ultimate-in-c...

My advice is simply to buy the latest and very best one you can afford, NOT a fixer-upper. You can't turn a bad 'un into a good 'un for anything like the price differential between them. And a service history is essential. One major undisclosed defect on a cheap no-history car could cost you as much to fix as the car itself cost.
Good points actually.