RE: 2024 Kia EV6 GT | UK Review

RE: 2024 Kia EV6 GT | UK Review

Friday 2nd August

2024 Kia EV6 GT | UK Review

The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N and Kia EV6 GT share a great deal - which is better?


It probably says a lot about Kia these days its 585hp GT is arguably in danger of being overlooked. There’s the Ioniq 5 N to think about, of course (and we’ll be doing plenty of that). But cars like the EV9 and EV3 are probably even more significant for the Korean brand, and the recent facelift of the EV6 didn’t mention the flagship. It’ll continue, surely, and with an update not far away it seemed worth checking up on what the groundbreaking Kia still does well - and what might need improvement. 

Given the performance potential, the GT remains fairly modest as a trim level. Because the standard EV6 is so distinctive already, the addition of 21-inch wheels, neon green accents and a couple of badges don’t necessarily convey the fact that this is 250hp more powerful than any other version. It’s probably just about enough - but unlike the Hyundai, the EV6 never looks like anything but a family-friendly coupe-cum-SUV. Unlike its sibling, it doesn't try too hard. There are nice touches inside, too, with smart contrast stitching and lofty seats that hug well, yet the balance always feels more in favour of ‘EV6’ than ‘GT’. 

On the road, it’s an immediately more serious EV6, and that’s good. Even taking into account what a regular single- or dual-motor model drives like, there’s a sense of purpose and intent to the GT. The steering is weightier and faster, the ride better tied down without being uncomfortable in Normal mode, and the performance truly ferocious without ever seeming wild or uncontrollable. (Autocar timed a GT through the quarter-mile in 11.8 seconds, so it’s definitely not just a traffic light GP hero). That the GT feels imbued with this additional tautness and enthusiasm without sacrificing much EV6-ness is impressive. 

It would be an excellent test drive car, the GT, whatever you’d come from beforehand. Let’s not forget, either, that it offers this performance and this additional dynamic edge for a smidge over £60k. And that’s what an ID7 GTX costs. So perhaps any cosmetic quibbles can be overlooked. It’s cheaper than any i5 or A6 e-tron, and a more invigorating steer than at least one of them. 

What the EV6 lacks is that additional layer of ability that the Ioniq 5 N boasts. This is a grippy, capable, fast, enjoyable EV - up to a point. It has a comfort zone where it does its best work, the EV6 GT, and isn’t especially nice beyond that, feeling a tad vague, inconsistent and big. Torque vectoring that can be a boon, say, on a roundabout, seems indecisive with more commitment, the assists clumsy and the steering distant. Reasonably modest tyres for the performance (the rears, which deal with the bigger motor, are just 255-section) bring some welcome friskiness scooting around at low speed but don’t bring loads of faith going faster. Wherever Drift Mode lives it’s not easily found, and the EV6 never really fosters the confidence to push it tremendously hard anyway. 

GT mode makes the car too busy, highlighting every secondary imperfection on the road and turning a nicely calibrated throttle into a button. The configurability is undoubtedly welcome, because it really can change the EV6 from mellow to more outlandish, though certain elements seem overwrought. If there must be two different brake pedal settings, it shouldn’t require coming to a stop to adjust them. Thankfully the paddle-operated regen, including one-pedal drive, remains very good, and the brakes are progressive without being the last word in feel. 

All of which is hardly the end of the world, but with the Hyundai having shown what’s possible with the E-GMP platform it’s hard not to yearn for it (and take the more punishing ride). Its front axle is better connected, its wheel and body control superior, the brakes inspire more confidence and the assists intervene with greater precision. It’s a better resolved driver’s car, put most simply, without getting into the gimmicks that make it such juvenile entertainment. 

The Kia can at least counter some of these criticisms with its GT credentials. Almost certainly this was never badged a GTR or something more overtly sporting, because that’s not what this is. The GT is an EV6 that’s been made faster and better to drive, unlike the brash Hyundai which seems every inch the bespoke N product. That still leaves the Kia in a nice spot, however, comfortable and commanding at a cruise (with just a bit of tyre noise) and super composed on a sweeping A-road as opposed to being hustled down a country lane. The trip computer on our car showed an average of 3.4mi/kWh on delivery, which stayed around 3mi/kWh and 2.5 on a brisker journey. Fair given the performance, though 263 miles of range now looks a bit measly. 

Kia’s claim of this being the Stinger GTS for a new age used to feel a tad disingenuous, but it makes sense now. Like the old V6 bruiser this is a better car to drive than most will probably give it credit for and is blessed with great performance and cruising credentials - while representing something like good value. That it looks like nothing else (again as per the Stinger) will only help the EV6’s cause for those willing to think outside the box. 

The Ioniq 5 N remains an unavoidable blot on the horizon, however. At a similar price (this is £62,675; the Ioniq £65,000) the simple fact is that the GT's sibling is more enjoyable to drive, for much more of the time. And that matters. But it’s also far from the end of the story: an updated GT with a little more range and finesse would become newly recommendable all over again. Moreover, as a used purchase, the 585hp Kia looks more than a little appealing from £40k. And not being quite as good as an Ioniq 5N still makes the EV6 GT a lot better than many others we can think of...


SPECIFICATION | 2024 KIA EV6 GT

Engine: Lithium-ion battery, 77.4kWh capacity, twin AC synchronous electric motors
Transmission: Single-speed, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 585@4,400rpm-9,000rpm (front motor) and 6,800-9,400rpm (rear motor)
Torque (lb ft): 546@ 0-4,200rpm (front motor) and 0-6,600rpm (rear motor)
0-62mph: 3.5 secs
Top speed: 162mph
Weight: 2,200kg
Range: 263 miles (WLTP), 3.02mi/kWh claimed, 235kW max charge rate
Price: £62,675

 

Author
Discussion

blearyeyedboy

Original Poster:

6,466 posts

184 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
This seems to be the car Ford wished the Mach-E was.

Impressive effort from Kia, IMO.

Bloxxcreative

548 posts

50 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
How many miles were at a brisk pace for that efficiency to drop? If most the time was spent hooning around, that mileage doesn't seem that bad given most 'performance' models will have the same happen.

Would take this over alot of the evs on the market and even comparatively, price seems about right.

Jader1973

4,239 posts

205 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
£62k?

For a KIA?

Jesus wept.

Kevin-y9fs3

9 posts

42 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
Those lightly used ones at £40k look both conspicuously good value and worrisome from a deprecation point of view.

I recently spent some time around a Lotus Electre and couldn't shake the opinion that to my eyes it looks like a Kia. These days, I'm not so sure whether that was a compliment or an insult.

RC1807

12,863 posts

173 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
Kevin-y9fs3 said:
Those lightly used ones at £40k look both conspicuously good value and worrisome from a deprecation point of view.

I recently spent some time around a Lotus Electre and couldn't shake the opinion that to my eyes it looks like a Kia. These days, I'm not so sure whether that was a compliment or an insult.
The Lotus is massive IRL. I’ve only seen them in NL.

kambites

68,179 posts

226 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
RC1807 said:
The Lotus is massive IRL. I’ve only seen them in NL.
There's quite a few around here (in Hampshire), probably at least partly because there's a big Lotus dealer just down the road. They are indeed enormous.

The Kia isn't a small car, but it's on a completely different scale than the Lotus.

Chris Peacock

2,531 posts

139 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
Jader1973 said:
£62k?

For a KIA?

Jesus wept.
Nah, I don't think Jesus is a badge snob. He's ok with it.

Lotobear

6,973 posts

133 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
challenging looks on these, the rear end always reminds me of a basking shark for some reason.

curvature

420 posts

79 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
I fancied one the Kia's but back in December I could only test drive a base model.

What really prevented me taking it any further is that there were no deals to be had so I bought an iX3 instead. The iX3 was a similar price but works £300 a month cheaper and BMW chucked in a home charger as part of the deal.

Darnoc95

468 posts

35 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
Jader1973 said:
£62k?

For a KIA?

Jesus wept.
It is 2024 you know! It's actually a bit of a bargain compared to other performance EV's

bennno

12,468 posts

274 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
curvature said:
I fancied one the Kia's but back in December I could only test drive a base model.

What really prevented me taking it any further is that there were no deals to be had so I bought an iX3 instead. The iX3 was a similar price but works £300 a month cheaper and BMW chucked in a home charger as part of the deal.
Yes, but you could have had 0-60 in 3.5 seconds and a much better car.

E90_M3Ross

35,501 posts

217 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
Jader1973 said:
£62k?

For a KIA?

Jesus wept.
If it was the exact same car underneath, but had a Mercedes or Porsche badge, would it be OK if it was £62k? Badge aside, is it expensive for what it is, when you consider of other, similar, alternatives on the market?

SmithCorona

715 posts

34 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
Big fan of these Kias and their Hyundai stable mates. Good performance, good build quality, good looks. What isn't there to like. If I have to move to all EV vehicles this could happily be the station car.

cerb4.5lee

32,645 posts

185 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
Darnoc95 said:
Jader1973 said:
£62k?

For a KIA?

Jesus wept.
It is 2024 you know! It's actually a bit of a bargain compared to other performance EV's
It seems expensive to me, because I still remember when Kias were absolute crap. However...the performance that this offers for the money is something that I definitely can't argue with though. I'm not keen on the way it looks though, plus the steering wheel is properly ugly to my eyes as well.

I do like the 0 to 60 time and the bhp/torque figures a lot, and that is certainly something that these EVs are good at I reckon.

curvature

420 posts

79 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
bennno said:
curvature said:
I fancied one the Kia's but back in December I could only test drive a base model.

What really prevented me taking it any further is that there were no deals to be had so I bought an iX3 instead. The iX3 was a similar price but works £300 a month cheaper and BMW chucked in a home charger as part of the deal.
Yes, but you could have had 0-60 in 3.5 seconds and a much better car.
Having ridden bikes over the years 0-60 times don't really bother me. I've now driven nearly 16k miles in the iX3 and really cannot fault it.

As my daily vehicle I want something that is comfortable, reliable and cost effective. The iX3 does all that and I am sure the Kia would have delivered on the first two items but £300 a month more?

Can I ask what car you drive?

911Spanker

1,686 posts

21 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
Darnoc95 said:
Jader1973 said:
£62k?

For a KIA?

Jesus wept.
It is 2024 you know! It's actually a bit of a bargain compared to other performance EV's
It seems expensive to me, because I still remember when Kias were absolute crap. However...the performance that this offers for the money is something that I definitely can't argue with though. I'm not keen on the way it looks though, plus the steering wheel is properly ugly to my eyes as well.

I do like the 0 to 60 time and the bhp/torque figures a lot, and that is certainly something that these EVs are good at I reckon.
Ah the Kia Magentis...that sort of stuff is what I grew up with.. smile

ex-devonpaul

1,259 posts

142 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
curvature said:
Having ridden bikes over the years 0-60 times don't really bother me. I've now driven nearly 16k miles in the iX3 and really cannot fault it.

As my daily vehicle I want something that is comfortable, reliable and cost effective. The iX3 does all that and I am sure the Kia would have delivered on the first two items but £300 a month more?
Odd that there is such a difference given the similar purchase cost - I guess it is down to the expected depreciation?

cerb4.5lee

32,645 posts

185 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
911Spanker said:
cerb4.5lee said:
Darnoc95 said:
Jader1973 said:
£62k?

For a KIA?

Jesus wept.
It is 2024 you know! It's actually a bit of a bargain compared to other performance EV's
It seems expensive to me, because I still remember when Kias were absolute crap. However...the performance that this offers for the money is something that I definitely can't argue with though. I'm not keen on the way it looks though, plus the steering wheel is properly ugly to my eyes as well.

I do like the 0 to 60 time and the bhp/torque figures a lot, and that is certainly something that these EVs are good at I reckon.
Ah the Kia Magentis...that sort of stuff is what I grew up with.. smile
The 1980's Kia Pride was another cracker as well. biggrin

You just don't forget these things rightly or wrongly, and once a turd...always a turd for me. It is the same reason why I couldn't buy a modern Skoda either, because all I'd ever think about would be the 1982 Skoda Estelle that I had. Changing someones perception of something isn't an easy thing to do I reckon.

dinkel

27,109 posts

263 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
Jader1973 said:
£62k?

Jesus wept.
The EV route is for rich folks only: how on this planet can an EV ever be something affordable to own?

About 1/3rd of the value is in the batteries...

What a massive waste of resources and hope: with government sponsoring failing this industry will be niche for ever

craig9367

57 posts

147 months

Friday 2nd August
quotequote all
Range kills this for me, as a family steer it needs to be able to do 300+ as it will be the car you take on longer journeys. I expect the facelift will address that.