Which microlight?

Author
Discussion

7mike

Original Poster:

3,032 posts

196 months

Saturday
quotequote all
I've seen lots of good advice for budding PPLs here so wonder if any one's got any thoughts on my current dilemma? I can't justify a full blown PPL but have finally decided to go for a microlight licence. I'll be 59 soon and appreciate learning takes longer for old gits like me. I am however one of those loons that jumps out of perfectly good aeroplanes, so I'm not completely in the dark regarding aviation (or hanging around for good weather).

Anyway; any thoughts on weight-shift or three axis? Pro's & cons for each, thank you!


LimaDelta

6,649 posts

221 months

Do you want to be inside or outside?

996Type

778 posts

155 months

Have you also considered the self med cert sub PPL bracket (NPPL) which I believe is around 10 hours less than the full PPL. Still get access to all club planes etc but with some restrictions. I’m looking at this myself…..



jjones

4,431 posts

196 months

If you are looking at indoor (3-axis) then the skyranger is an amazing aircraft, only downside is they look a bit meh (if you go for an older model just make sure it has a rotax 912 engine and xlam coverings (rather than dacron)).

AFORS.com is a great site for "shopping".

7mike

Original Poster:

3,032 posts

196 months

Thanks for the replies, regarding indoors/outdoors, I guess practicality suggests indoors is better. I did experience a weight shift flight many years ago and loved it though.

The NPPL sounds tempting too, but then I assume the cost of flying 'proper' aircraft would be much more? I don't want to end up doing the minimum amount to remain current. Would hours in a microlight count if I did decide to upgrade in the future?

The instructor I've spoken to suggested I get a lesson in each and take it from there. Sounds like a good idea, fingers crossed for the weather over the next few weeks then!

5150

693 posts

258 months

If you're going to fly Microlights, then I would strongly suggest the NPPL.

What you've got to remember is, you can fly Microlights on a PPL but none of the hours you log in a Microlight, will count towards the Biannual hours requirement for the PPL, so essentially, if you operate on a PPL, every two years, you will have to sit a skills test in a SEP class, to revalidate the PPL, so unless you have easy access to one of these, then can be a costly exercise.

NPPL has a weight limit on it, but I don't know anyone with a PPL who has used the licence to operate 'heavy' singles up to 5700kg.


RizzoTheRat

25,458 posts

195 months

Do you plan to ever fly things other than microlights?

I used to fly gliders and one study I read years ago there had been I think 7 glider pilots killed in crashes over a period of time, and they all also flew weight shift microlights. They thought they'd all got in to a stall/spin and reverted to thinking as a weight shift pilot and pulled the stick instead of pushing.

Hill92

4,293 posts

193 months

3-axis vs flex-wing/weight shift is really just a personal preference. Taking a lesson in both before making a decision is the best way to go

The licencing situation is complicated and there is currently a CAA consultation to change it further, not least to potentially offer clearer upgrade routes from NPPL/LAPL level to PPL.

https://www.caa.co.uk/general-aviation/pilot-licen...

Currently the NPPL offers three class ratings:
Microlight
Simple Single Engine Aircraft (SSEA - similar to but not exactly the same as Single Engine Piston (SEP) for PPLs)
Self-Launching Motor Gliders (SLMG) – ignored for now).

Microlights allow you to fly either three axis or flex-wing/weight-shift microlights (with differences training available to switch from one to the other) up to 600 KG max take off mass with 1 passenger. SSEA permits you to carry 4 passengers and fly aircraft up to 2,000 KG. It also allows aerobatics and a few other upgrades.

Although both Microlight and SSEA routes officially require fewer hours than a PPL, in practice few student pilots complete the course in minimum hours anyway.

You also need to consider what type of medical you want or can hold. The Pilot Medical Declaration (PMD) allows you to fly if you meet DVLA driving standards and don’t have one of the disqualifying conditions for flying with passengers (if you just want to fly alone you just need to not be suffering from a psychiatric condition. The other two main medical standards for private pilots are the full blown Class 2 medical and the Light Aircraft Pilot’s Licence medical, both of which involve visits to an Aeromedical Examiner (AME).

The SSEA route isn’t available for ab-initio students with a PMD because you’re not allowed to undertake on aircraft certified under Part 21 (think Cessnas, Pipers, most of the PPL training fleet); you can only train on Part 21 with at least a LAPL medical. There aren’t many non-Part 21 aircraft operated for ab-initio flying training.

However it is relatively easy to add subsequently add a SSEA class rating to a NPPL(M).

Modern 3-axis Light Sport Microlights (<600 KG) with Rotax engines and lightweight composites often outperform their older metal ‘spam can’ cousins in performance (speed and range) and comfort. Even the older <450 KG models have a lot going for them. They can very likely cover the vast majority of the flying you might choose to do. Although we all like to take up passengers, we’re often just flying alone so the extra seats in a SSEA may not be worth it. With the right combination of NPPL, medical and aircraft, it’s possible to fly to Europe, even though the NPPL is only a national licence (as opposed to the PPL/LAPL, which are derive from ICAO and EASA conventions).

Cost wise there is a wide range of microlights available. You could spend £250,000 on the latest hot ships or £20,000 on a second hand model, or £4,000 to join a syndicate for the cheapest flying possible.

7mike

Original Poster:

3,032 posts

196 months

Yesterday (18:32)
quotequote all
Thanks once again, some useful information there and pretty much convinced me the NPPL(M) route will do for me. I'll certainly have a go in each before I decide.

That was an interesting point Rizzo regarding the fatalities amongst glider pilots. I guess anyone who has had a go at a flight sim has a rudimentary idea of what pulling/pushing a stick does, let alone how to make it bank. Weight-shift seems counterintuitive so in a high pressure situation I can see how muscle memory could kick in. I'll see how it goes.

GliderRider

2,232 posts

84 months

Yesterday (18:58)
quotequote all
7mike said:
Thanks once again, some useful information there and pretty much convinced me the NPPL(M) route will do for me. I'll certainly have a go in each before I decide.

That was an interesting point Rizzo regarding the fatalities amongst glider pilots. I guess anyone who has had a go at a flight sim has a rudimentary idea of what pulling/pushing a stick does, let alone how to make it bank. Weight-shift seems counterintuitive so in a high pressure situation I can see how muscle memory could kick in. I'll see how it goes.
Is started off on model aircraft, then flew gliders, then went to weight-shift hang gliders, then flew various microlights (weightshift and three axis) and light aircraft, then back to gliders and now back to model aircraft. At no point did I have any issue whether I should push or pull. The only thing I found was that weight-shift microlights tend to have steering like a homemade go kart (push left/go right), which took some remembering when confronted by rudder pedals again, but that was the only concern.
With a hang glider, more so than a weight-shift microlight, you are moving your body in the direction you want to go, rather than trying to make the wing go somewhere as you do when sitting in a trike.

7mike

Original Poster:

3,032 posts

196 months

Yesterday (19:23)
quotequote all
GliderRider said:
Is started off on model aircraft, then flew gliders, then went to weight-shift hang gliders, then flew various microlights (weightshift and three axis) and light aircraft, then back to gliders and now back to model aircraft. At no point did I have any issue whether I should push or pull. The only thing I found was that weight-shift microlights tend to have steering like a homemade go kart (push left/go right), which took some remembering when confronted by rudder pedals again, but that was the only concern.
With a hang glider, more so than a weight-shift microlight, you are moving your body in the direction you want to go, rather than trying to make the wing go somewhere as you do when sitting in a trike.
That's good to know, I think I'll stop confusing myself and wait to have a go. Fingers crossed for tomorrow's weather, not sure it's looking good here frown