Poll:

Total Members Polled: 116

Author
Discussion

EmailAddress

Original Poster:

14,487 posts

233 months

Thursday 30th November 2023
quotequote all


Edited by EmailAddress on Tuesday 24th September 09:58

fttm

4,062 posts

150 months

Thursday 30th November 2023
quotequote all
Verstappen is a petulant wker , is that ok ?

Presuming Ed

1,616 posts

223 months

Thursday 30th November 2023
quotequote all
Can we not just put AD 21 and 22 budget cap onto the naughty step and never mention it.
And silverstone 21
And Monza
The block pass
Understeer

Ah there’s too many triggers!!!

thegreenhell

19,623 posts

234 months

Thursday 30th November 2023
quotequote all
Sometimes those topics are going to be relevant to the discussion, so you can't blanket ban them. Without a mod to police it they are going to come up anyway - some people just can't help themselves.

Some race threads are going to be awfully quiet if you can't chew the general fat of F1 while you wait for something interesting to happen.

Heathwood

2,855 posts

217 months

Thursday 30th November 2023
quotequote all
It’s not just historical references though is it? It’s the tribal mentality and inability to see or accept any other viewpoint. As valid as your suggestions are, I think we’ll still get that from certain posters regardless.

snoopy25

1,998 posts

135 months

Thursday 30th November 2023
quotequote all
Here for the 'historical banter'

hehe

Adrian W

14,740 posts

243 months

Thursday 30th November 2023
quotequote all
Or just ignore this thread and carry on as before

FNG

4,521 posts

239 months

Friday 1st December 2023
quotequote all
Compelled to log in just to vote.

To say pretty pretty please, let’s agree to not tolerate dragging AD21 over the sodding coals, yet again.

(and all the other grave injustices that keep getting brought up ad infinitum)

It’s more than just tedious, it’s killed these pages compared to where they were a few years ago.

Killer2005

20,210 posts

243 months

Friday 1st December 2023
quotequote all
Definitely keep on topic.

Anyone trolling gets a thread ban.

Eric Mc

123,903 posts

280 months

Sunday 3rd December 2023
quotequote all
snoopy25 said:
Here for the 'historical banter'

hehe
Yeah - the Fangio V' Farina banter got totally out of hand.

Tim the pool man

5,292 posts

232 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
thegreenhell said:
Sometimes those topics are going to be relevant to the discussion, so you can't blanket ban them. Without a mod to police it they are going to come up anyway - some people just can't help themselves.

Some race threads are going to be awfully quiet if you can't chew the general fat of F1 while you wait for something interesting to happen.
Are there no mods in this forum then? (probably a silly question as it would appear not frown )

There are plenty of "general" F1 threads for arguing (if you must) but I'd certainly prefer the race threads to be strictly for the current race.

Hungrymc

7,059 posts

152 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
Sometimes, relatively recent history provides a context for an opinion or a discussion point.

Even PIAP’s opening posts tell us about prior races etc.

Obvious Trolling / being offensive… Surprised if they are permitted under the current rules.

Chamon_Lee

3,941 posts

162 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
EmailAddress said:
Examples.

Un-Acceptable:

We all know Lewis can't overtake around the outside without turning in. It's the slums mentality.

Max races like he's wrestling his Dad in Primark for the last orange beanie.


Acceptable:

Lap 7, Turn 5, Hamilton and Verstappen's line was outside of traditional corner trajectories but if you look at the same corner last year, the rubber from support races was causing issues so perhaps they had that in mind.
lol this reminds me of those "office" examples you see for things like shut the fk up your talking rubbish.

PhilAsia

5,952 posts

90 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
How about we all just respond or not respond, let the discussion meander or not meander, ignore or not ignore?




TikTak

2,272 posts

34 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
Can see the argument for both here, the school room rules feel overhanded but at the same time most threads end up the same way.

What a pickle.

520TORQUES

8,204 posts

30 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
Move to China, you'll love it.

Tim the pool man

5,292 posts

232 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
PhilAsia said:
How about we all just respond or not respond, let the discussion meander or not meander, ignore or not ignore?

How about we have F1 race threads where the race can be discussed in an adult manner? As I said before there's plenty of other threads on the forum where you can discuss/argue/troll to your hearts content if that floats your boat...

Tim the pool man

5,292 posts

232 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
520TORQUES said:
Move to China, you'll love it.
I'm staggered that the vote isn't virtually unanimously in favour of restricting the rubbish! When I first suggested this I almost added that anyone voting against it should be blocked from any race threads...

Mark-C

6,630 posts

220 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
My tactics:

- Join race thread when PIAP starts it and thank him\note down timings\randomly vote for something
- Comment on something so thread is easily findable
- Ignore it until FP1 and then join in
- Leave immediately the race finishes but sneakily pop back in every now and then to see what people are still arguing about

The noise has been there ever since Fangio hit a straw bail at Silverstone in 1950 gifting Farina the win ... it's just much much louder these days!

520TORQUES

8,204 posts

30 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
Tim the pool man said:
I'm staggered that the vote isn't virtually unanimously in favour of restricting the rubbish! When I first suggested this I almost added that anyone voting against it should be blocked from any race threads...
No doubt you are staggered, those who promote censorship often are.