B-21 Raider
Author
Discussion

Silver3ides

Original Poster:

1,723 posts

248 months

Thursday 1st December 2022
quotequote all
Not long to go now for the live reveal @ 01.00 (UK time) Saturday Morning from Northrop Grummans Palmdale production facility

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chJlJgrvfBY

Simpo Two

91,229 posts

288 months

Thursday 1st December 2022
quotequote all
B-21... why is the numbering going backwards? 17 - 24 - 29 - 52 etc... to name a few.

16v_paddy

366 posts

215 months

Thursday 1st December 2022
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
B-21... why is the numbering going backwards? 17 - 24 - 29 - 52 etc... to name a few.
Well it's technically going forward as it's the replacement for the B1 and the B2

Simpo Two

91,229 posts

288 months

Thursday 1st December 2022
quotequote all
16v_paddy said:
Simpo Two said:
B-21... why is the numbering going backwards? 17 - 24 - 29 - 52 etc... to name a few.
Well it's technically going forward as it's the replacement for the B1 and the B2
Marketing, I expect. And 'B3' was too logical. Like there's no Aston Martin DB8 'cos they said people would think it had 8 cylinders... nobody complained about the 5-cylinder DB5!

Evanivitch

25,826 posts

145 months

Thursday 1st December 2022
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
B-21... why is the numbering going backwards? 17 - 24 - 29 - 52 etc... to name a few.
After the B1 and the B2 US military stealth technology rapidly improved, so much so that they can't remember where they left B3-B20. It's only now they've put an Air Tag in the B-21 that they've managed not to lose it.

LotusOmega375D

9,063 posts

176 months

Friday 2nd December 2022
quotequote all
Thanks for the teaser, but I think I’m going to hang on for a test flight before putting down a deposit.

ecsrobin

18,517 posts

188 months

Friday 2nd December 2022
quotequote all
A bargain at $2 billion a jet.

ChemicalChaos

10,707 posts

183 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
B-21... why is the numbering going backwards? 17 - 24 - 29 - 52 etc... to name a few.
Numbering in all the classes (B, F, A) is all over the place because they have been arbitrarily "reset" several times over the years. I can't remember the reason now I'm afraid but I did find out once in the past.

dvs_dave

9,040 posts

248 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
What we got to see if it, front on, wasn’t too exciting. It basically looked like a tweaked B-2.

ecsrobin

18,517 posts

188 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
dvs_dave said:
What we got to see if it, front on, wasn’t too exciting. It basically looked like a tweaked B-2.
Probably because that’s still the best design.

IanH755

2,624 posts

143 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
This article from "The Drive: Warzone" has some good images - https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/this-is-the-...

It looks like the lovechild between a B-2 (design) and an F-35 (avionics) in a much smaller package, I just hope (as is always in these modern times) that enough can be bought to prevent this becoming another F-22, B-2, Zumwalt issue of "Great idea but nowhere near enough bought, making each one hugely expensive and irreplaceable in a peer war".

Muddle238

4,362 posts

136 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
LotusOmega375D said:
Thanks for the teaser, but I think I’m going to hang on for a test flight before putting down a deposit.
No doubt in keeping with most new models nowadays, it’ll only be available in some shade of grey.

I’d be interested if I could have it in British Racing Green with a cream leather interior.

S600BSB

7,413 posts

129 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
Looks quite similar to a B-2.

bitchstewie

64,183 posts

233 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all

sherman

14,876 posts

238 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
Could the numbering just be because of prototypes that never officially left Area 51 for example?

Tony1963

5,808 posts

185 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
For comparison


Tango13

9,844 posts

199 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
For comparison

Interesting... The original design for the B-2 lacked the trailing edge serrations and was much closer to the B-21 in plan view.

Petrus1983

10,801 posts

185 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
Stunning.

My biggest issue with it is the only way for them to justify the cost is for finding a way to use them.

shouldbworking

4,791 posts

235 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
The whole nuclear triad thing doesn't make sense to me. Yeah, submarines have their deficiencies, but compared to land or air options they are far better, so how do you justify the cost for this?

Evanivitch

25,826 posts

145 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
shouldbworking said:
The whole nuclear triad thing doesn't make sense to me. Yeah, submarines have their deficiencies, but compared to land or air options they are far better, so how do you justify the cost for this?
Because it also has a non-nuclear strike capability that many nations lack the ability of. Like the UK has no strategic strike capability. At best we'd launch a bunch of tomahawks from a submarine and hope a few make it through a capable air defence system.