More teams in F1

More teams in F1

Author
Discussion

Tazar

Original Poster:

524 posts

198 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
I personally think there should be more teams in F1. That’s not saying that the Starting Grid should be more than 20 cars as we presently have.

In the past where qualifying was split so new teams had to qualify to qualify we had young drivers who had their equivalent super licences or the necessary permission then show their ability amongst the stars. Sometimes someone in a less funded car qualified in front of a regular team and driver. Sometimes someone new in a fully funded car started winning. Would Brawn have been allowed ?

There’s lots of talk at the moment that teams don’t want to split the financial side more than it does with the present 10 teams. They don’t have to if it’s the regular 10 teams getting the 20 starting slots but they don’t want someone such as Andretti , regular racers who have a history of winning, coming in and out qualifying the regular teams. Maybe Penske would want to come back or Peugeot or Toyota.

It should be a case if a team can come up with the required funds it should be allowed to qualify. If it doesn’t qualify it gets no payment. If it gets onto the Starting Grid then it’s earned something on merit. It should not be a closed shop because Toto or Christian or another says so.

There’s lots of drivers who are capable of driving competitively in F1 and not enough cars at present.

anonymous-user

60 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
I think the big problem now is the $200 million entry fee.

deadslow

8,219 posts

229 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
Andretti state they (or their backers) have the funds. I'd like to see them on the grid. They are racers.

carl_w

9,439 posts

264 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
The other teams won't have it as it dilutes the prize money. Even if you make the rules such that only the top 10 teams get any money, at the moment the 10th team is guaranteed cash but with 11 teams it wouldn't be.

Sandpit Steve

11,230 posts

80 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
deadslow said:
Andretti state they (or their backers) have the funds. I'd like to see them on the grid. They are racers.
yes

Andretti isn’t some fly-by-night entrant. They’ve got the $200m if required, and have a long history in competitive motorsports. They’re also Amercians, who would likely field an American driver, which is good for F1 the business.

It’s up to F1 (Liberty) to reassure, if not underwrite, the commercial side to the existing entrants - many of whom have made billion-dollar investments over a decade or more, and don’t want to be diluted.

StevieBee

13,390 posts

261 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
Tazar said:
In the past where qualifying was split so new teams had to qualify to qualify we had young drivers who had their equivalent super licences or the necessary permission then show their ability amongst the stars.
That's the memory. The reality was a little different.

Most of those teams that required to pre-qualify really were rather rubbish. Those who drove for them either had their careers destroyed by them, were drivers making a last role of the dice or pay-drivers with no serious hope of even qualifying let alone achieving anything of note. I'm sure there may have been some but off the top of my head I can't recall any driver who drove for a 'pre-qualifying' team to go on and have a long and illustrious career in F1.

Any driver with real potential would have been better racing in Japan for a few years (as Irvine, Alesi and a few others did) until a seat become available in better teams than driving for one of the pre-quali back marker outfits.







Carlososos

976 posts

102 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
If they can afford it they should be on the grid. No one should be able to stop anyone joining as long as they can compete within 107% unless it’s obvious dirty money from some undesirable state.

Tazar

Original Poster:

524 posts

198 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
The main requirement for a team to compete in F1 is having the necessary funds in place to make whatever payments are needed to the appropriate authorities. No promises that it’s coming or we’ll have it by then. If the team has the funding in place nobody can dispute that that they cannot afford to compete.

Obviously a driver has to have the required license to compete in F1 unlike days gone by when drivers with little experience of top level motorsport could just jump into a car.

If those two requirements are met it’s a great pity that they cannot compete for a qualifying place.


thiscocks

3,156 posts

201 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
StevieBee said:
Tazar said:
In the past where qualifying was split so new teams had to qualify to qualify we had young drivers who had their equivalent super licences or the necessary permission then show their ability amongst the stars.
That's the memory. The reality was a little different.

Most of those teams that required to pre-qualify really were rather rubbish. Those who drove for them either had their careers destroyed by them, were drivers making a last role of the dice or pay-drivers with no serious hope of even qualifying let alone achieving anything of note. I'm sure there may have been some but off the top of my head I can't recall any driver who drove for a 'pre-qualifying' team to go on and have a long and illustrious career in F1.

Any driver with real potential would have been better racing in Japan for a few years (as Irvine, Alesi and a few others did) until a seat become available in better teams than driving for one of the pre-quali back marker outfits.
There were plenty of good drivers in teams which had to pre-qualify though. Moreno, Larini and Martini spring to mind. First and foremost I think we definitely need more cars on the grid than currently otherwise there simply isnt the opportunity for drivers who haven't got the backing. Even if the team a driver makes it to F1 with is poor, then they still have the opportunity to show their speed, even if it's just against their team mate. Ie Alonso at Minardi.

carl_w

9,439 posts

264 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
thiscocks said:
There were plenty of good drivers in teams which had to pre-qualify though. Moreno, Larini and Martini spring to mind.
Alboreto, Tarquini, Modena, Brundle, Johansson, Gachot, Winkelhock, Dalmas, Lehto, Alliot in the period from 1988-1992
Villeneuve, Tambay, Fabi, Patrese, Rosberg, Arnoux, Piquet, Stuck, Mass, Jarier, Warwick in the period from 1977-1982


StevieBee

13,390 posts

261 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
carl_w said:
thiscocks said:
There were plenty of good drivers in teams which had to pre-qualify though. Moreno, Larini and Martini spring to mind.
Alboreto, Tarquini, Modena, Brundle, Johansson, Gachot, Winkelhock, Dalmas, Lehto, Alliot in the period from 1988-1992
Villeneuve, Tambay, Fabi, Patrese, Rosberg, Arnoux, Piquet, Stuck, Mass, Jarier, Warwick in the period from 1977-1982
Mmm. I'm not sure all of these count in the context being discussed. Whilst they competed during a time when pre-qualification was necessary, I wouldn't put them (or more precisely, their teams) in that category.

If you look at Brundle, he joined Brabham (or MRD) at point of decline in a previously championship winning team. The Zackspeed wasn't too bad a car (though unreliable). Moreno was a handy driver but never really top league.

Without looking, who can name any drivers (or any drivers that went onto win races and championships) who raced for Coloni, or Fondmetal, or AGS, or Venturi or Dallara.....etc?





anonymous-user

60 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
Sandpit Steve said:
yes

Andretti isn’t some fly-by-night entrant. They’ve got the $200m if required, and have a long history in competitive motorsports. They’re also Amercians, who would likely field an American driver, which is good for F1 the business.

It’s up to F1 (Liberty) to reassure, if not underwrite, the commercial side to the existing entrants - many of whom have made billion-dollar investments over a decade or more, and don’t want to be diluted.
As far as engineering is concerned, they are a fly by night company. They run kit cars manufactured by other companies, F1 is a completely different kettle of fish. The nearest they will get is a HAAS type arrangement, probably with McLaren as the technical partner and a kit car builder as manufacturer because technically they have to be a constructor.

Even Williams, with all their advantages and in house engineering ability located in the centre of an F1 engineering powerhouse region are struggling, imagine trying to start all that from scratch from the USA.

Muzzer79

10,857 posts

193 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
StevieBee said:
carl_w said:
thiscocks said:
There were plenty of good drivers in teams which had to pre-qualify though. Moreno, Larini and Martini spring to mind.
Alboreto, Tarquini, Modena, Brundle, Johansson, Gachot, Winkelhock, Dalmas, Lehto, Alliot in the period from 1988-1992
Villeneuve, Tambay, Fabi, Patrese, Rosberg, Arnoux, Piquet, Stuck, Mass, Jarier, Warwick in the period from 1977-1982
Mmm. I'm not sure all of these count in the context being discussed. Whilst they competed during a time when pre-qualification was necessary, I wouldn't put them (or more precisely, their teams) in that category.

If you look at Brundle, he joined Brabham (or MRD) at point of decline in a previously championship winning team. The Zackspeed wasn't too bad a car (though unreliable). Moreno was a handy driver but never really top league.

Without looking, who can name any drivers (or any drivers that went onto win races and championships) who raced for Coloni, or Fondmetal, or AGS, or Venturi or Dallara.....etc?
Damon Hill raced for Brabham in 1992. He was involved for 8 races, qualifying for 2 of them (GB and Hungary)

He did alright in his subsequent career....

RichB

52,583 posts

290 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
thiscocks said:
<clip> There were plenty of good drivers in teams which had to pre-qualify though.
Damon Hill had to pre-qualify the Brabham in 1991, making it through into a couple of grand prix.

vaud

51,821 posts

161 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
Joey Deacon said:
I think the big problem now is the $200 million entry fee.
It's peanuts for any big car company. A small fraction of annual R&D. Plus it has value, so they can always sell the team on and recover their $200m.

StevieBee

13,390 posts

261 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
RichB said:
thiscocks said:
<clip> There were plenty of good drivers in teams which had to pre-qualify though.
Damon Hill had to pre-qualify the Brabham in 1991, making it through into a couple of grand prix.
As I mentioned in regards to Brundle... Brabham declined steadily from being a championship winning team to nothing. That's different to someone fancying a crack at F1 and building a car out of Meccano which seemed to be the case with a lot of new entrants in F1 during the late 80s to mid 90s. When you can't even qualify for the qualifying, it's difficult to see what value such teams added to F1.

Fundoreen

4,180 posts

89 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
What is the point of a load of teams that tt about at the back trying to qualify and never do? Doesnt add to the spectacle.
However ,lots of new jobs 'working in F1' is appealing to people that want jobs working in F1.

wiliferus

4,115 posts

204 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
I quite like the idea of having more teams/cars than grid positions.

22-24 cars qualifying for 20 grid positions… stick it in the wall or blow the engine during Q1 - boom, weekend over. Could add some interesting twists and turns in the WDC?

vaud

51,821 posts

161 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
wiliferus said:
I quite like the idea of having more teams/cars than grid positions.

22-24 cars qualifying for 20 grid positions… stick it in the wall or blow the engine during Q1 - boom, weekend over. Could add some interesting twists and turns in the WDC?
Rubbish for sponsors. That era has gone with the current cost base.