BT to go on strike
Discussion
It's been 20 years since I worked at BT. But back then there was a small but very vocal core of largely ex-Post Office employees who would threaten to strike at the drop of a hat. They even followed it through once and formed a rather sparsely-attended picket line outside the office. I thought it was rather sweet at the time.
deckster said:
It's been 20 years since I worked at BT. But back then there was a small but very vocal core of largely ex-Post Office employees who would threaten to strike at the drop of a hat. They even followed it through once and formed a rather sparsely-attended picket line outside the office. I thought it was rather sweet at the time.
It would be sparsely attended. Guidance suggests a max number of 6 picketers allowed at any one time.I've often wondered why BT don't sell/partition off the vast amounts of massive telephone exchanges they own in London?
Example building

The space was needed back in the days where humans made the connections and even up until the 00's with analogue/ISDN where rack upon rack of network equipment was required but now with fibre and 4U racks very little space is needed in comparison.
Example building
The space was needed back in the days where humans made the connections and even up until the 00's with analogue/ISDN where rack upon rack of network equipment was required but now with fibre and 4U racks very little space is needed in comparison.
untakenname said:
I've often wondered why BT don't sell/partition off the vast amounts of massive telephone exchanges they own in London?
Example building

The space was needed back in the days where humans made the connections and even up until the 00's with analogue/ISDN where rack upon rack of network equipment was required but now with fibre and 4U racks very little space is needed in comparison.
The problem is that telephone exchanges are secure facilities. Not quite so easy to partition off and lease out. Example building
The space was needed back in the days where humans made the connections and even up until the 00's with analogue/ISDN where rack upon rack of network equipment was required but now with fibre and 4U racks very little space is needed in comparison.
Those built in the 50' to 70's. Made for pre-microchip exchange equipment (valves, vacuum tubes, et Al) that would take up an entire 2 story detached house but designed in the cold war, made to survive but the equipment now fits in a single rack.
So in the event of a zombie apocalypse I'd head straight for the nearest phone exchange.
cossy400 said:
F**k it the whole country should down tools and be done with it.
Or thou if the chiefs had 32%, then i se no problem with them striking, take it from the execs etc
It would be good to have a requirement that the boss cannot earn a higher payer in %term than the staff. This would incentivise management to get more productivity and nurture the staff.Or thou if the chiefs had 32%, then i se no problem with them striking, take it from the execs etc
Look after the workers and the productivity on the company improves.
I know the issue is trying to be competitive to recruit the best talent in CEO otherwise they all go abroad, but the incentives are not aligned to making the best for the company.
valiant said:
deckster said:
It's been 20 years since I worked at BT. But back then there was a small but very vocal core of largely ex-Post Office employees who would threaten to strike at the drop of a hat. They even followed it through once and formed a rather sparsely-attended picket line outside the office. I thought it was rather sweet at the time.
It would be sparsely attended. Guidance suggests a max number of 6 picketers allowed at any one time.crankedup5 said:
The next group of workers that have balloted for strike action over pay increase issues. They are looking for 10% and that has been refused. Meanwhile the CEO pocketed a 32% pay increase last year. Hope your line or broadband doesn’t need fixing anytime soon.
Meanwhile BT prices rise by CPI + 3.9% each year...leef44 said:
cossy400 said:
F**k it the whole country should down tools and be done with it.
Or thou if the chiefs had 32%, then i se no problem with them striking, take it from the execs etc
It would be good to have a requirement that the boss cannot earn a higher payer in %term than the staff. This would incentivise management to get more productivity and nurture the staff.Or thou if the chiefs had 32%, then i se no problem with them striking, take it from the execs etc
Look after the workers and the productivity on the company improves.
I know the issue is trying to be competitive to recruit the best talent in CEO otherwise they all go abroad, but the incentives are not aligned to making the best for the company.
ks.cossy400 said:
F**k it the whole country should down tools and be done with it.
I wish we all could. I get paid a hell of a lot less than this lot that are going on strike and think they're hard done by. My monthly take home pay has gone up by £33 in the last five years! However, my employer's costs are rising and their customers are spending less, so where would the money come from?leef44 said:
It would be good to have a requirement that the boss cannot earn a higher payer in %term than the staff.
I thought this some time ago - highest paid person shouldn't be paid more than a certain multiple of the lowest paid person. Of course, those at the top would find a clever accountant to minimise their salary and take the big money via some other channel.Who gives a s
t what the CEO is on? There will always be richer people in the world than you. I try not let it affect me but some people have a real bee in their bonnet about what the boss earns, and why Elon musk isn't helping starving Africans etc.
If they feel they are worth 10% more then fine, strike until the cows come home but don't use the CEO wage packet as amunition.
Bit like when the MP's get a payrise. So what?! You couldnt pay me enough money to take the amount of collective s
t that 70 million people can throw at you. F that they should be paid more, it might attract more talent.
Oh wow went a bit off topic there. As you were.
t what the CEO is on? There will always be richer people in the world than you. I try not let it affect me but some people have a real bee in their bonnet about what the boss earns, and why Elon musk isn't helping starving Africans etc.If they feel they are worth 10% more then fine, strike until the cows come home but don't use the CEO wage packet as amunition.
Bit like when the MP's get a payrise. So what?! You couldnt pay me enough money to take the amount of collective s
t that 70 million people can throw at you. F that they should be paid more, it might attract more talent.Oh wow went a bit off topic there. As you were.
NextSlidePlease said:
Who gives a s
t what the CEO is on? There will always be richer people in the world than you. I try not let it affect me but some people have a real bee in their bonnet about what the boss earns, and why Elon musk isn't helping starving Africans etc.
If they feel they are worth 10% more then fine, strike until the cows come home but don't use the CEO wage packet as amunition.
Bit like when the MP's get a payrise. So what?! You couldnt pay me enough money to take the amount of collective s
t that 70 million people can throw at you. F that they should be paid more, it might attract more talent.
Oh wow went a bit off topic there. As you were.
Agreed and if you don’t like what you’re being paid go and find a better paid job. Yes there are some jobs in society that are criminally underpaid but also a huge number of people that are underpaid in their head but it’s due to the fact they have just sat in the same job for years. If you want to move up the ladder salary rise you have to move jobs regularly. Not necessarily outside of the company you are in either.
t what the CEO is on? There will always be richer people in the world than you. I try not let it affect me but some people have a real bee in their bonnet about what the boss earns, and why Elon musk isn't helping starving Africans etc.If they feel they are worth 10% more then fine, strike until the cows come home but don't use the CEO wage packet as amunition.
Bit like when the MP's get a payrise. So what?! You couldnt pay me enough money to take the amount of collective s
t that 70 million people can throw at you. F that they should be paid more, it might attract more talent.Oh wow went a bit off topic there. As you were.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


