Police by consent? Vs mob rule
Author
Discussion

Ian Geary

Original Poster:

5,366 posts

215 months

Sunday 12th June 2022
quotequote all
Morning,

I can't see a BBC article on this story, so have included both the Guardian and Daily Mail version for balance

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jun/11/pr...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10907001/...

When glancing at this yesterday, I hadn't appreciated the immigration service had to release the detained chap then and there, as the police were unable to lift/break the protest around the van.


Without getting bogged down in immigration, what strikes me is the discussion point on the police only being able to do their job via the concent of the public.

The London riots reminded me how vastly outnumbered the police are, and they just rely on outnumbering criminals/suspects on a tiny micro scale at any point in time.

Any sort of widespread non compliance like this leaves the UK police model utterly unable to proceed, unless its say a football match or large event, where tonnes of planning will have taken place.

I suppose another aspect to consider is there are few events that will trigger the "community" to block the authorities like this.

Immigration officers doing their job (imo) is one such event I guess, but is not likely to be repeated if, say, the police arrest a person who is a bit stabby, or perhaps if it was raining?

So we're not exactly witnessing the start of The Purge.


Still worthy of reflection/discussion I think, though as I said to me it's more about how the police uphold laws when numbers of the public don't agree with them, Vs a let's rant about immigrants thread (as we have those already)

Ian

anonymous-user

77 months

Sunday 12th June 2022
quotequote all
Policing by consent is one of few really great British things we have left. It is much admired around the world and preferable in my opinion to the much more authoritarian systems elsewhere in the world.

XCP

17,602 posts

251 months

Sunday 12th June 2022
quotequote all
Not worth anyone getting hurt. He'll come again.

Ian Geary

Original Poster:

5,366 posts

215 months

Sunday 12th June 2022
quotequote all
They're both really good points.

I guess the Met need to choose their battles carefully, especially after the Sarah Everard vigill outcome.

Plus having a sense of proportionally about it.

Drawweight

3,484 posts

139 months

Sunday 12th June 2022
quotequote all

I think it’s happened in Glasgow at least once.

One or two people trying the same stunt would be arrested and presumably charged but a mob is somehow exempt.


grumbledoak

32,362 posts

256 months

Sunday 12th June 2022
quotequote all
We might not like the outcome in this case, but giving the police the numbers and equipment to allow the government to rule by force is quickly going to be much worse.

Ian Geary

Original Poster:

5,366 posts

215 months

Sunday 12th June 2022
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
We might not like the outcome in this case, but giving the police the numbers and equipment to allow the government to rule by force is quickly going to be much worse.
Yep, I've had my cup of coffee now this morning, and can see how a situation where this Was Never Allowed To Happen"would be a pretty miserable place.

Pretty much like every future scinfi film in fact.

anonymous-user

77 months

Sunday 12th June 2022
quotequote all
Mob rule typically only occurs when the law is considered to be wrong or unjust, so is often a signifier that the law needs to be amended.

It doesn’t help that public belief in the police and also the political system has also been challenged, people faced with police and politicians who ignore or subvert the law are less likely to obey it themselves.

grumbledoak

32,362 posts

256 months

Sunday 12th June 2022
quotequote all
Ian Geary said:
Yep, I've had my cup of coffee now this morning, and can see how a situation where this Was Never Allowed To Happen"would be a pretty miserable place.

Pretty much like every future scinfi film in fact.
yes Lots of good ones, certainly.