Kingspan sponsorship.

Kingspan sponsorship.

Author
Discussion

Drawweight

Original Poster:

3,059 posts

122 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all

https://www.racefans.net/2021/12/02/mercedes-kings...

I can sort of see the point of view in that Kingspan has been vilified over Grenfell Towers but honestly are Mercedes so desperate for sponsorship that they need the bad publicity that has descended upon them?

I don’t know how easy sponsorship is to get in F1 but one would like to think that the top team in F1 would have less trouble than most.

So why risk the inevitable backlash?

kambites

68,192 posts

227 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all
I suspect it's a matter of whoever runs the commercial side of the operation being unaware of the issue. Grenfell got a lot of publicity here but I doubt anyone outside the UK has ever heard of it so there's no particular reason it should be on Mercedes' radar.

It's certainly a PR mess here, though.

super7

2,003 posts

214 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all
Drawweight said:
https://www.racefans.net/2021/12/02/mercedes-kings...

I can sort of see the point of view in that Kingspan has been vilified over Grenfell Towers but honestly are Mercedes so desperate for sponsorship that they need the bad publicity that has descended upon them?

I don’t know how easy sponsorship is to get in F1 but one would like to think that the top team in F1 would have less trouble than most.

So why risk the inevitable backlash?
Why do people need to make such a noise about it....... f**king cancel culture again and again.

Grenfell was bad, no doubt about it. Some dreadful decisions, but this was years ago and yet companies and people are still getting vilified for it because the whole world is expected by a few to pile sympathy upon them time and time again.

cholo

1,138 posts

241 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all
It's stupid really as wasn't most of the insulation Celotex?

I believe that only a very small proportion was Kingspan.

Do the people who complain about this complain about Kingspans other form of Marketing?

I would say that they have certainly had their moneys worth even before a car hits the track with their logo.

Hugo Stiglitz

38,038 posts

217 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all
Drawweight said:
https://www.racefans.net/2021/12/02/mercedes-kings...

I can sort of see the point of view in that Kingspan has been vilified over Grenfell Towers but honestly are Mercedes so desperate for sponsorship that they need the bad publicity that has descended upon them?

I don’t know how easy sponsorship is to get in F1 but one would like to think that the top team in F1 would have less trouble than most.

So why risk the inevitable backlash?
What a piss poor piece of journalism.

'Some'

'May have'

Really? So that's definitive then.

boombang

551 posts

180 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all
Drawweight said:
https://www.racefans.net/2021/12/02/mercedes-kings...

I can sort of see the point of view in that Kingspan has been vilified over Grenfell Towers but honestly are Mercedes so desperate for sponsorship that they need the bad publicity that has descended upon them?

I don’t know how easy sponsorship is to get in F1 but one would like to think that the top team in F1 would have less trouble than most.

So why risk the inevitable backlash?
A slightly tongue-in-cheek reply but Daimler / Mercedes have some solid historical links to the Nazi party, used forced labour in camps and created parts of many military vehicles and weapons that killed many thousands in WW2. They seem to have got over that ok, albeit that's a more distant memory.

essayer

9,487 posts

200 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all
I’m sure all other F1 sponsors are beyond reproach..

LukeBrown66

4,479 posts

52 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all
I think Kingspan are an Irish firm, they are involved in all sorts of building work, they used to sponsor top Irish rally driver Eugene Donnelly, so F1 is a major step for them, but I would imagine like any building firm they cut corners.

kambites

68,192 posts

227 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all
cholo said:
It's stupid really as wasn't most of the insulation Celotex?

I believe that only a very small proportion was Kingspan.
Hmm, yes. <5% of the insulation was Kingspan; they weren't involved in its selection for that application; and the product was clearly marked as not suitable for use on high-rise buildings. Quite how Kingspan are in any way to blame is a bit of a mystery to me!

hot metal

1,989 posts

199 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all
Just some dick journalist looking for a reaction, rolleyes nothing to see here, move on.

JonChalk

6,469 posts

116 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all
kambites said:
cholo said:
It's stupid really as wasn't most of the insulation Celotex?

I believe that only a very small proportion was Kingspan.
Hmm, yes. <5% of the insulation was Kingspan; they weren't involved in its selection for that application; and the product was clearly marked as not suitable for use on high-rise buildings. Quite how Kingspan are in any way to blame is a bit of a mystery to me!
Convenient timing to remove Saudi human rights discussion from front and back pages?
Sad re-purposing of rightful inquiry into a sad and distressing incident?

HustleRussell

25,146 posts

166 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all
I cannot believe that Gove joined in on this pile-on when the disaster was caused by regulatory failure and many people remain displaced to this day. I'm actually disgusted by him.

SmoothCriminal

5,271 posts

205 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all
Another bandwagon to jump on apparently kingspan was less than 5% and used without the companies knowledge.

Honestly you'd think gove would have better things to worry about this tory government is ste

HustleRussell

25,146 posts

166 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all
Also aren't there people still homed in similar deathtraps in population centres, being asked to cough up for cladding repairs? Where is the Conservative government's impetus to safeguard the lives of those people?

Gove isn't even blaming the problem. It is so tenuous. It's pathetic and it makes me angry.

super7

2,003 posts

214 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all
hot metal said:
Just some dick journalist looking for a reaction, rolleyes nothing to see here, move on.
The "Grenfell Towers" action group wrote to Mercedes and probably copied all the press.....

95 fiesta si

1,600 posts

158 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all
KIngspan is used in pretty much all new builds for loft insulation. I have it it in my loft.

nice1two

328 posts

205 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all

Hugo Stiglitz

38,038 posts

217 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all
super7 said:
hot metal said:
Just some dick journalist looking for a reaction, rolleyes nothing to see here, move on.
The "Grenfell Towers" action group wrote to Mercedes and probably copied all the press.....
They were acting on information given to them. Sadly it appears wrong and again the media love to shoot first and never check later.

TheDeuce

24,376 posts

72 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all
The fact the media are focussed on some very crude comments made by kingspan employees regards the supply and defence of their products shows that they're reaching to create villains for the sake of a story. They supply building products to builders - of course they deal with problems and negotiations/complaints via liberal use of the F word.

Absolutely disgraceful that the media (and now that donut Gove) is acting to put pressure on a business dealing which is itself nothing to do with the on-going investigation - and in principle there should be no assumptions made until the investigation concludes in any case.

Assuming as I suspect the case will be, Kingspan are found to not be at fault - how in retrospect will Gove justify writing a letter to Mercedes asking them not to take kingspan as a sponsor? At a stroke he has turned the positive marketing kingspan were seeking to pay for in to negative publicity. Does he have that right before the investigation concludes? Do his actions not suggest he actually has no confidence in the outcome or process of the investigation?

There's actual nasty stuff in the world for the media to focus on without exploiting the Grenfell tragedy in such a tenuous way for the sake of promoting further upset/outrage (to sell papers to morons..)

Tim Reaper

4,527 posts

85 months

Friday 3rd December 2021
quotequote all
There was controversy in the 70s when Surtees had Durex sponsorship , nothing changes .

It's just everyone has to be offended by something .