RE: 2022 Lotus Evija prototype | PH Review

RE: 2022 Lotus Evija prototype | PH Review

Thursday 29th April 2021

2022 Lotus Evija prototype | PH Review

Bow down before the new hypercar god



The biggest problem with electric hypercars and their outlandish performance numbers is that of believing they are possible. That stays true, as the Lotus Evija proves, even after experiencing them in real life. Because to experience this level of acceleration without the sound and fury that normally accompanies it is a deeply disconcerting experience.

The Evija prototype I drove on track at Hethel was some way short of final specification. It didn't have the active dampers, active aerodynamics and active torque biasing the finished car will feature, or any regenerative braking. The front-to-rear torque bias was arbitrarily fixed at 23:77 - the production version will be able to juggle this near instantly - and it also lacked any traction or stability control. It was, pretty much, the distilled essence of Evija: Lotus preferring to first perfect a car's base set-up before adding features. Power was also slightly down, limited to 1,600hp across the four electric motors, so nearly 400hp less than the targeted spec. And it had an unsporting 140mph speed limiter, while the finished car will be able to get past 200mph.

Even with those limitations in place, the development Evija was incredibly, almost painfully fast, being constrained by its artificial limiter well before the chicane on Hethel's long Mansell straight. But there was also a definite disconnect between the two sides of the experience - organ-crushing accelerative forces and the spiralling numbers on the digital speedometer on one hand, the absence of any engine note or the punctuation of gears changing on the other.



There are noises in the cockpit, amplified by the prototype's almost naked carbonfibre tub: a muscular electrical hum from the front motors, the rumble of tyres, squeal of carbon brakes and sound of air rushing over the carefully sculpted bodywork. The production version will also project an artificial low-speed noise to warn pedestrians of its approach, this based on the sound of a Lotus 49's DFV. But from the driver's seat there isn't any of the savagery that normally comes as standard in this rarefied part of the market. It feels almost too easy to engender ludicrous speed, and I get out after my first stint on track both knowing that the Evija is almost certainly quicker than a Bugatti Chiron - on Lotus's figures the production version will be 4.6 seconds quicker from 0-186mph - yet also somehow disbelieving it.

The rest of the dynamic experience is reassuringly Lotus-like. The Evija has been developed under the leadership of long-serving chassis guru - and now Director of Attributes - Gavan Kershaw, and he and his team have created it around the same rulebook as the company's other models. That means hydraulic power steering and a conventional brake servo, both requiring electric pumps, chosen on the indisputable basis that both offer superior sensation to pure electric alternatives.

The steering feels exactly as it should: light but with proper feedback and delivering proportional front-end responses with no sense of dartiness. Kershaw has warned of the need to get some heat into the Trofeo R tyres before getting too keen - despite clear skies Hethel is at a bracing six degrees Celsius. But even before the rubber fully wakes up grip feels strong, and the messages coming through the steering wheel are clear and unambiguous.



The decision to use a relatively tall battery pack positioned pretty much where a mid-mounted engine would go, rather than increase the height of the car by sitting it on a 'skateboard' layout, was also informed by dynamic considerations. The 718kg weight of the 70kWh pack is significantly more than an internal combustion engine would be, but its position means the Evija behaves pretty much like an XL Evora, rotating around the mass and making it easy to adjust the cornering line and attitude with fine inputs. The compliant suspension, with a deliberate small quantity of initial roll, also boosts confidence when getting the car turned.

The prototype felt surprisingly svelte considering a 1,680kg all-up kerbweight and, once the Trofeos are warmed, impressively tolerant of bigger accelerator applications despite the lack of electronic sentinels. All-wheel drive was rarely evident; only the combination of steering lock, power and taking a bigger bite out of one of Hethel's stripy kerbs giving the sense of any power sharing the steered wheels. Yes, it will oversteer - spectacularly so, as Kershaw was happy to demonstrate - but only if you want it to.

The lack of reference points makes it hard to sense just how fast the Evija is on an otherwise empty racetrack. A full-bore start produces a similar steam catapult sensation to the one I remember in an aggressively launched Tesla Model 3 Performance, my previous high watermark of EV performance. The prototype's lack of launch control means it is probably no quicker from 0-60mph, and may even be slightly slower, but while the Tesla's acceleration fades quickly as it heads into triple digit speeds, the Evija's rate of change feels undiminished, all the way to the arrival of the speed limiter. Something that came as a surprise every single time.



The finished Evija will have adjustable aerodynamics courtesy of both a hydraulically adjustable rear wing and a pair of active flaps within its vast diffuser. The company says these will be able to make huge amounts of downforce, but isn't ready to put a number on quite how much yet. The prototype's wing elements were fixed but it was still making a significant quantity of negative lift, this obvious in the speed it could carry through Hethel's faster turns. The use of Formula 1 style 'heave dampers' linking the upper wishbones on each side and meant that even significant aero-squash didn't ruin the car's ride, and the steering kept its subtlety as the forces grew.

Braking was the one area where the prototype felt well off final spec. The development car is running ABS for its hugely powerful Brembo CCR carbon-ceramics, but with a basic calibration that hadn't been optimized for the car meaning surprisingly early intervention. Even so, the pedal started to soften noticeably after repeated big stops, something the engineering team said will definitely be improved for the production car, and with the arrival of regenerative braking through the four motors.

The other issue was one the Evija can't be blamed for given the basic laws of thermodynamics: the fact that harder use consumes the battery at a predictably prodigious rate. The company says it is targeting a 250-mile WLTP range when running in the gentlest of what will be five switchable dynamic modes, but fanged around a track it is possible to empty the cells of charge in under 15 minutes. The Evija supports charging speeds of up to 350kWh which, when such potent chargers are available, will allow it to the replenished in barely more time than it takes to empty it.



The prototype lacks the niceness that the finished Evija will both have and need, considering its £1.7m ex-VAT price tag, but it has clearly been designed to be more usable than most hypercars. Even with a rollcage the cabin feels more spacious than the segment norm, with access over narrow sills and a respectable amount of headroom. The view out is also brilliant, certainly to the front, with a wraparound windscreen, narrow A-pillars, and clear sight of the front wings to help place the car. The prototype's view to the rear is non-existent, but the production version will add a camera based virtual mirror system.

A chance to have a mooch in the build area - the same place the Lotus Carlton was originally assembled - shows that the Evija's hidden engineering is beautiful, too. Platform engineer Louis Kerr is proud to show off both the vast one-piece carbon tub, large enough to allow suspension components to be mounted directly to it without subframes, as well as the intricacy of the pushrod operated suspension. The considerable weight of Lotus's engineering expertise has clearly been put to use here.

It's hard to discuss the merits of any hypercar without bringing emotion into the discussion. This part of the market is based on want, not need - and where buyers traditionally expect both raw performance and visceral thrills. The Evija is set to deliver on one of those criteria better than almost anything else capable of road registration, much less on the other. It's a hugely talented car, a technical tour de force, and Lotus looks set to win the race to bring a viable EV hypercar to market. But it's also going to be very different from anything that's gone before. The future is nearly here, be in no doubt - but is the world ready for it?


SPECIFICATION | LOTUS EVIJA PROTOTYPE

Engine: 4 x 375kW AC motors
Transmission: single speed transmission for each wheel, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 1972 (targeted, production version)
Torque (lb ft): 1257 (targeted, production version)
0-60mph: <3.0-sec (targeted, production version)
Top speed: >200mph (targeted, production version)
Weight: 1,680kg (targeted, production version)
Range: 250 miles (WLTP) (targeted, production version)
Price: £2m (£1.7m ex-VAT)
CO2: 0g/km
















Author
Discussion

Strugs

Original Poster:

513 posts

241 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
The more cars like this made now, the less scared I am of how an all-electric future will be..

clacs2

317 posts

171 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
Indeed. What a marvellously silly thing.

I hope they stick with the mad Max interior option as well. Slightly pricey though.

Terminator X

17,163 posts

216 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
Strugs said:
The more cars like this made now, the less scared I am of how an all-electric future will be..
I'm pretty sure that the tech from cars costing £1.7m + taxes will never be available in £30k vehicles.

TX.

robsprocket

116 posts

190 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
This doesn't sound fun, drive at snails pace to a track day using as little battery power as possible. Then blast around the track for a couple of laps making sure you save enough power to get you to the nearest working charger. No thanks, current battery technology doesn't really make sense for cars like this.

Bser16

78 posts

67 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
Zero interest in this Chinese "hyper" car. It weighs at least 1,700kg and costs a million. So much for simplify and add lightness. Might be light for an EV but thats a consultation prize.

Lotusgav

145 posts

171 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
Takes a Bugatti veyron 10 mins to empty its tank at vmax- and they weigh how much? And cost how much? I’ll take the Evija thanks ...

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

266 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
Lotusgav said:
Takes a Bugatti veyron 10 mins to empty its tank at vmax- and they weigh how much? And cost how much? I’ll take the Evija thanks ...
No regen on this which throws away all the energy pretty rapidly. Though hard use on track will still murder the pack you should get some back improving it esp if it can regen at anywhere near that 350kw

Vee12V

1,381 posts

172 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
Lotusgav said:
Takes a Bugatti veyron 10 mins to empty its tank at vmax- and they weigh how much? And cost how much? I’ll take the Evija thanks ...
No regen on this which throws away all the energy pretty rapidly. Though hard use on track will still murder the pack you should get some back improving it esp if it can regen at anywhere near that 350kw
No regen on the prototype but the final version will have it.

chelme

1,353 posts

182 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
A significant part of what makes a sports/supersports/supercar inherently satisfying to drive is the fact it has an engine and the engine not only responds to inputs, but also sounds fantastic.

"A muscular electrical hum from the front motors" does not, and I wager will not cut it, whatever the silly stats are. Teleporting on a milk float is not what I call exciting.

AshD

229 posts

261 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
Before anyone else gets in....if my numbers come up on the Euromillions...

What a wonderful looking thing.

I get the comments about engine noise, years ago i had a V8 Esprit with optional sports exhaust...but i have to say driving my Model 3 Performance around the Milton Keynes roundabouts is much more fun than i thought it would be.

All I’d politely say is that if you haven’t driven something like that (and the Model 3 is way better to drive than the Model S) don’t be too quick to judge.

And if anyone will do it well it’ll be the folks at Hethel.

Slowlygettingit

744 posts

53 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
Getting used to the challenging looks.
Certainly looks the part compared to the new Rimac - the noise aspect still leaves me confused. The aural experience is a key part of driving - as is having a gear box even an auto.....
Certainly more interested in than I was 12 months ago

Tuna

19,930 posts

296 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
Looks fantastic in black.

Reassuring that they're starting with the traditional dynamics you'd expect of a Lotus.

It's still hard to tell how the final car will be received. There's a lot of prejudice against hypercars, electric cars, and pretty much anything built in the UK, so it has a mountain to climb, even before you get to the question of the experience you can wring out of this sort of platform.

Good luck to 'em/

Tickle

5,430 posts

216 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
Bser16 said:
Zero interest in this Chinese "hyper" car. It weighs at least 1,700kg and costs a million. So much for simplify and add lightness. Might be light for an EV but thats a consultation prize.
It's also lighter than the article referenced Chiron. I'm not sure the simplifying of something like a new EV hypercar will be similar to using plastic window winders on an Elise. I'd like to think the approach has been used during design though.

chelme

1,353 posts

182 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
AshD said:
Before anyone else gets in....if my numbers come up on the Euromillions...

What a wonderful looking thing.

I get the comments about engine noise, years ago i had a V8 Esprit with optional sports exhaust...but i have to say driving my Model 3 Performance around the Milton Keynes roundabouts is much more fun than i thought it would be.

All I’d politely say is that if you haven’t driven something like that (and the Model 3 is way better to drive than the Model S) don’t be too quick to judge.

And if anyone will do it well it’ll be the folks at Hethel.
"Impressive" or "awesome" to drive an EV may be because of the acceleration, and I do not doubt that, however surely the more senses are stimulated the more "under your skin" the car becomes?

An EV supercar will be like the latest phone. Bought for the quick thrill, but with no enduring quality to warrant keeping it in the longer term or collection. The fake sound is just awful too.

It's not going to be the equivalent of a classic, like an old Ferrari or Porsche.

EVs are better off being luxury barges imho.

Mysstree

515 posts

58 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
How many of these will actually ever be used and rack up even a largish mileage. most of these will go into some billionaires car collection as part of their investment portfolio.

Water Fairy

6,012 posts

167 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
Enough of this mega horsepower crap that 0.000000001% of us may just experience. Give us something the masses can attain and exploit. Just like the original Elise.

Sick and tired of this mega numbers nonsense.

Venisonpie

3,929 posts

94 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
Sounds epic.

Despite being ev lardy the steering feel is there, it can be done. Note to ze Germans.

Equus

16,980 posts

113 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
robsprocket said:
This doesn't sound fun, drive at snails pace to a track day using as little battery power as possible. Then blast around the track for a couple of laps making sure you save enough power to get you to the nearest working charger. No thanks, current battery technology doesn't really make sense for cars like this.
This is the problem for all electric hypercars at the moment.

fk all use on the road, because you can't exploit even a tiny fraction of their performance without it being recklessly anti-social. Even if you get a clear bit of autobahn, one quick squirt up to Vmax will see you sitting at the services recharging for a couple of hours.

fk all use on the track, because you'll flatten the battery in a matter of minutes.

Only thing they're useful for is posing.

Far more sensible to design EVs with more accessible levels of performance, balanced against longer range/endurance.

Sway

30,946 posts

206 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
Spent a bit of time looking around the mockup at Speedweek last year.









It's much smaller than I expected, which was a nice surprise.

TypeRTim

724 posts

106 months

Wednesday 28th April 2021
quotequote all
if the whole car weighs in at 1680kg and the battery pack alone is nearly 720kg, that's mighty impressive whatever way you spin it. 4 electric motors, chassis, suspension, brakes, active aero, cabin, bodywork, heating and ancillaries all for around 960kg is pretty mental for a car of it's size.

But what's also pretty impressive in a less positive light is the ability to drain the battery pack in 15 minutes on track. I know hardly any will see the light of day - let alone a race track - given the price point, but it doesn't sound like a car you could drive to the track and use for a full day and then drive home. But that isn't what this car is about really, it's a bit of showboating and wcensoredy waving - showcasing the potential for performance of the technology available.