How accurate a wheel alignment machines

How accurate a wheel alignment machines

Author
Discussion

LennyM1984

Original Poster:

879 posts

83 months

Friday 8th January 2021
quotequote all
In October, I had my Cayman aligned at a local garage with front camber set to - 2.3 on both sides (it has adjustable arms). This was both sides maxed out (fully inboard) in the slots

Yesterday I had it realigned at a different place (a tuner/racecar prep place) and the before measurement for the front was - 2.3 on one side and - 1.7 on the other.

They have now equalised both sides to - 1.7 (which was what I wanted) by moving one of the struts 3/4 of the way outboard.

Given that nothing had changed, surely the before measurements should have been comparable between October and now. The car has new suspension and is fully poly bushed so I don't think bush wear would be the answer.

The rear was far closer and just required a little tweak.

So my question is, how accurate/repeatable are wheel alignments?

Elliot2000

785 posts

191 months

Friday 8th January 2021
quotequote all
They are accurate but it’s only as good as the person who sets it up and in what condition the equipment is in. It’s quite possible when one of sensor/camera mounts is slightly damaged on one of them

GreenV8S

30,895 posts

299 months

Friday 8th January 2021
quotequote all
It's possible to mess them up by leaving some preload in the suspension bushes when positioning the car, so the geometry that's measured doesn't reflect the normal running geometry. Anywhere competent should be aware of that though.

Hard to tell whether either/both measurements are accurate, but the later measurements seem to be suggesting one side is substantially different to the other. So presumably they're claiming that either the chassis or some suspension component is bent.

LennyM1984

Original Poster:

879 posts

83 months

Friday 8th January 2021
quotequote all
GreenV8S said:
Hard to tell whether either/both measurements are accurate, but the later measurements seem to be suggesting one side is substantially different to the other. So presumably they're claiming that either the chassis or some suspension component is bent.
Must of the suspension has been changed (shocks, arms, mounts etc) and the chassis itself has no signs of damage (factory welds, seam sealer, primer etc etc) so I'm assuming that either the upright is bent or the subframe needs adjusting (you have to drop the subframe to do various jobs and it is possible to screw up the alignment)

E-bmw

11,097 posts

167 months

Friday 8th January 2021
quotequote all
Sounds like you have answered your own question then.

Obviously the ideal is to do all/any suspension work and then get it aligned. Any subsequent work would then obviously invalidate any previous results, and would need to be realigned.

320d is all you need

2,114 posts

58 months

Friday 8th January 2021
quotequote all
At the end of the day it doesn't have to be "perfect", just decent enough.

A variety of machines can be damaged or out of adjustment or in need of calibration, the technicians who work on these machines may be a different level of competence.

One measurement may be in degrees the other may be in hours and minutes.

It carries on.

Basically it's very, very rare you can go from machine to machine and get repeatable results.

I have a rough idea of what I like my alignment to be , but the truth is, if it drives nicely, goes straight and the tyres wear evenly then I don't care.

Also, did you have the car re-aligned after fitting the new bushes / suspension?

Any work will impact the alignment. I have Polybushes fitted to my 320d and when it went to get aligned, I went from a neutral toe out at the front to a total of 23.5 degrees!

Any time any suspension part gets changed I get the car aligned, as such I try and group suspension work into a big single piece of work to not have to get the car aligned multiple times.

LennyM1984

Original Poster:

879 posts

83 months

Friday 8th January 2021
quotequote all
Hi,

All suspension work was done at the same time (before the first alignment) and nothing was changed between October and yesterday.

I simply wanted to reduce the front camber a little to provide a better compromise between track and road.

This is why I find it confusing to have such different numbers between the two alignments

GreenV8S

30,895 posts

299 months

Friday 8th January 2021
quotequote all
Camber is one of the easier things to measure for yourself, if you want to give it a sanity check.

E-bmw

11,097 posts

167 months

Friday 8th January 2021
quotequote all
LennyM1984 said:
Hi,

All suspension work was done at the same time (before the first alignment) and nothing was changed between October and yesterday.

I simply wanted to reduce the front camber a little to provide a better compromise between track and road.

This is why I find it confusing to have such different numbers between the two alignments
A kerb or pot hole could potentially move things slightly, especially if things aren't quite as tight as they should be.